|
COMMERCE BUSINESS DAILY ISSUE OF FEBRUARY 4,2000 PSA#2530FISC Norfolk Acq Group, Hampton Roads Detachment, 1968 Gilbert St.,
Suite 600, Norfolk, VA 23511-3392 Q -- PHARMACEUTICAL RETURN PROGRAM SOL N00189-00-R-0025 DUE 020700 POC
Julie Gordon, 757-443-1385 1. The combined synopsis solicitation in
section 2 of Amendment 004 of the subject solicitation is hereby
changed as follows: The text within paragraph 4 of section 2 is changed
as follows: FROM: Within the technical approach evaluation factor, the
Government will consider the following subfactors: a) proposed
approach and methodology (i.e., ability to convert NDC to NSN codes;
assemblage of medical allowance list [AMAL]; proposed time and manpower
savings; proposed disposal process; proposed shipping process; proposed
return program, inclusive of credit received program; proposed
utilization of subcontractors, if any; existing and/or proposed
partnerships with pharmaceutical manufacturer(s)/distributor(s) in the
local and CONUS areas; proposed training for the fleet, etc.) and b)
compliance with all required permits, certifications and/or licenses
required by federal, state and local authorities (i.e. EPA, FDA and
DEA). The Government will determinate ratings for subfactor (b) of
technical approach, compliance with all required permits,
certifications and/or licenses, as either acceptable or unacceptable.
If the Government rates a contractor as unacceptable within subfactor
(b), it will not further evaluate the contractor's proposal. The
Government will determine past performance ratings by evaluating the
following information which each offeror shall submit: information on
the five most recently completed federal, state and/or local government
contracts (or other commercial contracts if no government contracts
have been awarded to or completed by the offeror), completed in the
past five years, which are in any way relevant to the effort required
in this solicitation and similar information on any subcontractors
which the offeror intends to utilize and points of contact for any
existing partner pharmaceutical manufacturer(s)/distributor(s).
Offerors shall also include the following for each contract: a)contract
number; b)contract period of performance; c)contract type; d)dollar
value of the contract; e)detailed description of the work performed;
and f)name, activity, position, title and current telephone number
(with area code) of the government (or commercial) point of contact for
the contract. All Government minimum needs as stated above will be
evaluated. TO: Within the technical approach evaluation factor, the
Government will consider the following subfactors: a) compliance with
all required permits, certifications and/or licenses required by
federal, state and local authorities (i.e. EPA, FDA and DEA); and b)
proposed approach and methodology (i.e., ability to convert NDC to NSN
codes; assemblage of medical allowance list [AMAL]; ability to
interface and identify pharmaceutical needs with individual ships;
proposed time and manpower savings; proposed disposal process; proposed
shipping process; proposed return program, inclusive of credit received
program; proposed utilization of subcontractors, if any; existing
and/or proposed partnerships with pharmaceutical
manufacturer(s)/distributor(s) in the local and CONUS areas; proposed
training for the fleet, etc.). The Government will determinate ratings
for sub-factor (a) of technical approach, compliance with all required
permits, certifications and/or licenses, as either acceptable or
unacceptable. If the Government rates a contractor as unacceptable
within sub-factor (a), it will not further evaluate the contractor's
proposal. The Government will rate all elements within sub-factor (b)
on a best value basis. All elements within sub-factor (b) are of equal
importance. The Government will determine past performance ratings by
evaluating the following information which each offeror shall submit:
information on the five most recently completed federal, state and/or
local government contracts (or other commercial contracts if no
government contracts have been awarded to or completed by the offeror),
completed in the past five years, which are in any way relevant to the
effort required in this solicitation and similar information on any
subcontractors which the offeror intends to utilize and points of
contact for any existing partner pharmaceutical
manufacturer(s)/distributor(s). Offerors shall also include the
following for each contract: a)contract number; b)contract period of
performance; c)contract type; d)dollar value of the contract;
e)detailed description of the work performed; and f)name, activity,
position, title and current telephone number (with area code) of the
government (or commercial) point of contact for the contract. The
Government will evaluate the past performance of offerors from a best
value perspective. The Government will rate the offeror's past
performance in regards to their commitment to custo required permits,
certifications and/or licenses required by federal, state and local
authorities (i.e. EPA, FDA and DEA); mer satisfaction, their timely
delivery of quality services at fair and reasonable prices, the
existence of symbiotic relationships with partner pharmaceutical
manufacturer(s)/distributor(s) and compliance with all applicable
federal, state and local regulations. With the exception of sub-factor
(a) of technical approach (compliance with all required permits,
certifications and/or licenses required by federal, state and local
authorities), all Government minimum needs as stated above will be
evaluated from a best value perspective. 2. All other terms and
conditions of this solicitation remain unchanged. Posted 02/02/00
(W-SN420996). (0033) Loren Data Corp. http://www.ld.com (SYN# 0048 20000204\Q-0004.SOL)
Q - Medical Services Index Page
|
|