CG, MCAS CHERRY POINT, OIC, Contracts, Building 163, Curtis Road, PSC Box 8006, Cherry Point, NC 28533-0006

C -- INDEFINITE QUANTITY CONTRACT FOR MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING AND DESIGN SERVICES, MARINE CORPS AIR STATION, CHERRY POINT, NORTH CAROLINA SOL N62470-99-D-3906 DUE 092699 POC Marsha G. Temple, Contract Specialist, 252 466-4751 This solicitation is for mechanical and electrical engineering design services for various project at MCAS, Cherry Point, North Carolina. This is NOT a request for proposals. This proposed contract is being solicited on an unrestricted basis. It shall have an initial term of one year and may be renewed for one additional year at the option of the Government. The maximum total fee (subject to necessary changes) shall not exceed $500,000.00 including the option year. Opening project for this contract is Project CP0112M, Replace HVAC, Building 198. Engineering Services are required for mechanical and electrical designs, field investigations, preparation of plans, specifications, cost estimates, related studies and all associated engineering services, and shop drawing review. Incidental architectural, structural and civil engineering and environmental considerations may be required on some projects. Experience is required in design of new and/or modifications to existing systems including: HVAC, steam, chilled water, heat pumps, compressied air, industrial gases, plumbing, fire protection systems, pneumatic and digital electric controls for mechanical systems, shelters and structural modifications related to mechanical systems, modifications to electrical power distribution systems, lighting and architecturally related items such as roof repairs, doors, windows, ceilings and wall construction necessary for a complete project. A working knowledge of destructive and non-destructive material sampling and testing techniques is required. Sampling and testing for lead paint, asbestos, and contaminated soils will be required. Firms are required to prepare specifications in the SpecsIntact system format and drawings shall be in AutoCAD version 13 compatible format. Firms which meet the requirements described in this announcement are required to submit one copy each of completed SF-254 and SF-255 forms. Copies of SF-254 forms are also required for proposed consultants and copies of SF-255 forms are encouraged for proposed consultants who are expected to contribute significantly to the contract. Inquiries shall refer to contract number and title. The A&E must demonstrate his and each key consultant's qualifications with respect to the published evaluation factors for design and all option services. Evaluation factors (1) and (2) are of equal and greatest importance; factors (6), (7) and (8) are of lesser importance than factors (1) through (5). Pertinent statements relative to the evaluation factors shall be included in Part 10 of form SF-255. Superfluous information is discouraged. Firms responding by 4:00 p.m. EST, 26 September 1999 will be considered. Late responses will be handled in accordance with FAR 52.215-10. Specific evaluation factors include: (1) Professional qualifications of the firm's proposed personnel and its consultants (if proposed), necessary for satisfactory performance of required services. Resumes shall be included for persons expected to perform work under this contract, shall identify anticipated role in performing contract work, shall show specific location of each person's assigned office, shall list specific training and certification, and shall highlight specific work experience applicable to this contract; (2) Specialized recent (within the last five years) experience of the firm (including consultants) and technical competence in the type of work required. Cite examples of prior work relationship with proposed consultants/associates. In Part 8 of SF-255 provide a synopsis of the scope of work, year work completed, point of contact and telephone number for each project listed. Include only projects involving mechanical and electrical designs, similar in nature to required work. Specific project listed shall include a cross reference to the names of persons identified in evaluation Factor (1) and briefly describe their role in the project. Provide evidence that your firm is permitted by law to practice the profession of engineering in the State of resident i.e., state registration number; (3) Capacity to accomplish the work in the required time. Describe knowledge of the work area at Cherry Point and outlying fields. In a maximum of one page, provide a narrative and/or chart or graph showing the anticipated backlog of work over the next twelve month period for key personnel proposed for use in this contract. Firms shall identify any major pending projects or organizational changes that could impact the ability to dedicate personnel and resources to this contract. Provide one page maximum for you and consultants that describes office automation support and systems and other supporting equipment (i.e., AutoCAD, SpecsIntact); (4) Past performance on contracts with Government agencies and private industry in terms of demonstrated compliance with performance schedules and evidence of demonstrated long term business relationships and repeat business with Government and private customers. Firms may submit letters of commendation received for the specific projects identified in Part 8 of SF-255; (5) Qualityand cost control. Provide a one page maximum summary of how your firm approaches internal quality control and cost control processes and procedures. Identify how these will be maintained for all work by multiple offices and consultants. Provide an example for your quality control program in action; (6) Demonstrate success in prescribing the use of recovered material and achieving waste reduction and energy efficiency in facility design. Relate to personnel proposed and example projects listed, if possible; (7) Geographical office locations of the firm (including consultants) that will be involved in the contract. State anticipated mode of transportation to be used from each office and estimate approximate mileage and typical response time. Application of this criterion is contingent upon receiving an appropriate number of qualified firms. (8) The volume of work previously awarded to the firm by the Department of Defense (DOD) shall also be considered, with the object of effecting an equitable distribution ofDOD architect-engineer contracts among qualified architect-engineer firms. Posted 08/11/99 (I-SN366514). (0223)

Loren Data Corp. http://www.ld.com (SYN# 0020 19990813\C-0004.SOL)