|
COMMERCE BUSINESS DAILY ISSUE OF AUGUST 10,1999 PSA#2406U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Program Contract Service Center
(3803R), 401 M Street, SW, Washington, DC 20460-0001 B -- ACQUIRED IMMUNITY AND IMMUNOTOXICITY STUDY SOL RFQ-DC-99-00101
DUE 083099 POC Yvonne Stiso/stiso.yvonne@epa.gov/Contract Specialist
WEB: click here RFQ,
http://www.epa.gov/oamhpod1/oppts_grp/dc9900101/index.htm. E-MAIL:
click here to contact the contract specialist, stiso.yvonne@epa.gov.
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency under the Simplified
Acquisition Procedures of FAR Part 13 is seeking a contractor to
provide technical support for an assessment of the state of the science
on acquired immunity and immunotoxicity in development and children's
health protection. The SIC code for this requirement is 8733. The EPA
is FACNET certified. You may e-mail the contract specialist at:
stiso.yvonne@epamail.epa.gov. Please include the following: Company
name, address, phone number, business class, and e-mail address. NO
PHONE CALLS WILL BE ACCEPTED. Two copies of the proposal must be
submitted by the due date. US MAIL ADDRESS is- US EPA, 401 M Street,
SW, Mail Code 3803R, Washington, DC 20460, ATTN: Yvonne D. Stiso.
HANDCARRY (such as fed-ex) should be submitted to Ronald Reagan
Building, 1300 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Bid and Proposal Room, 6th
floor, Room 61107. Proposals are due NLT 2:00 PM /EST August 30,1999.
BACKGROUND An Assessment of the State of the Science on Acquired
Immunity andImmunotoxicity in Development and Children's Health
Protection: The immune system is designed to ward off invasive
organisms, combat diseases and perform other bodily defense functions.
The immune response process is complex and the end result of a
response is the combined product of both internal and external factors
and their interactions with a foreign agent. Some of the recent
findings are suggesting that external factors (such as chemicals,
radiation) combining with the timing of the exposure could affect the
course of the organism's response to conferring protective immunity,
inducing allergic or other types of immune responses. The net effect is
that the type and pattern of environmental exposures are likely to
alter or compromise an immune response process resulting in a different
outcome. This observation has public health importance, because to the
extent that we can understand the mechanisms at work in these
processes will dictate how we develop our strategy on how to prevent
exposures, control diseases and ensuring health protection.
Understanding how environmental exposures may impact the functional
aspects of the immune system at different stages of development is
important. The formation of structural components in an immune system
occurs during fetal development, but the process of attaining
functional immunity generally begins with birth. While the newborn is
quite capable of differentiating an agent as different from itself, the
process of acquiring protective immunity and other types of immune
responses will take time. Full development is not reached until all the
structural and functional components needed to support a competent
immune system is put in place. In man, this period extends over a
number of years during childhood. A body of evidence now gathering
suggest that the immune system may be particularly sensitive to the
toxic effects of certain environmental agents at the time of
development or during the time of a normal immune response. The
duration of the acquired immunity can vary, depending on a number of
factors such as the nature of the agent, potency and the frequency of
the encounter. It is generally accepted that a strong anti-microbial
immunity is desirable, but allergies and some of the other auto-immune
types of immune responses are not. The capacity for producing a
desirable or undesirable response is believed by some to be closely
related to early life events, life styles, and exposures during
critical pre- and post-natal developmental periods. Other types of
responses, such as auto-immunity, tolerance, and perhaps chemical
sensitivity, may have origins linking to events from critical
developmental periods. Developing infants and children are thought to
be potentially more sensitive to undesirable external effects that may
alter the course of the immune process, leading to immunity that may
be weakly protective, and exaggerated responses that may be
counter-productive or undesirable for the well-being of the host. The
net result is that, depending on the state of immunity andthe nature of
the exposure, altered immune responses may lead to a variety of
unpredictable end results. The purpose of this acquisition is to
commission the writing of a report that is based on documented
literature, processes that would lead to normal and altered immune
functions, factors that could lead to altered processes because of
early life events and exposures, the types and magnitude of these
outcomes, and their immediate or long-term health consequences. WORK
STATEMENT The contractor will review the scientific literature for the
body of bio-medical, clinical and epidemiologic data on the developing
fetus, infant, adolescent, and adult, for normal and abnormal immune
processes that may have environmental origins, and the consequences as
a result of process alterations or modifications. Where possible,
human data should be reinforced with supporting animal studies. Write
a detailed report (about 400-500 pages) on the subject, and discuss
each one of the major areas with case examples using an "if"..."then"
logic flow format. Where possible, use illustrations and tables to help
clarify or reinforce a concept. Provide a glossary of basic terms, and
a list of the references used. Reader's technical comprehension should
be at the college level, in both reading and writing. Task 1. Describe
the structure and components comprising of the body's defense system.
Define the human immune system developmental periods. Describe how in
the developmental process a fully functional system is attained.
Summarize the major theories describing the mechanisms involved in
producing an immune response. Describe the dynamics of cellular and
molecular interactions in producing various immune responses (humoral,
acute and delayed hypersensitivity). Discuss the type of immune
responses produced based on the nature of the antigenic moiety
(microbial, allergic, particulate, immune complexes, transplantation
immunity, tumor immunity, autoimmunity, tolerance, antigenic mimicry,
UV light, etc.) Discuss the mechanisms that lead to activation,
potentiation or suppression of humoral and cellular immune responses.
Task 2. Discuss the immune system as a responsive and self-regulating
mechanism. Examine the system's response characteristic to a stimulus,
and describe how different internal and external factors may influence
whether beneficial or detrimental effects are the expected outcomes in
the developing organism. Discuss in the course of becoming fully
immuno-competent, how diverse immune stimuli and competing mechanisms
can alter or compromise the normal immune process. Discuss our current
understanding of atopy and how exposure patterns and nature of the
stimuli may alter the response and the course of a disease. Discuss
risk factors and how they may alter the state of the immune response.
Discuss the outcome on immune regulation between TH-1 and TH-2
activations. Task 3. The contractor should address the following
questions in the report: How should one expect the outcome to an immune
stimulus to differ during different stages of the developmental
process? How do the timing, quality, and quantity of an exposure (to an
environmental toxicant) vary the result of an immune response as a
function of the immune status of the host? How might one be able to
anticipate the effects of known stimuli in induction, potentiation,
suppression, or in the production of tolerance under different immune
states or different developmental periods? How do the effects of
environmental exposures differ in the developing immune system, and how
the action of agents such as radiation, chemicals and allergens differ?
How does one attribute an effect to be a change in mechanism or a
change in the variability in sensitivity? How do risk factors alter the
level of protective immunity against microbial or other pathogenic
agents? What are the time implications for early life exposures on
latency of cancers in children and in the adult, or on non-cancer
endpoints? How might long term environmental changes and pollution
potentially affect the dynamic balance of pathogenic virulence and what
are the implications for health? Deliverables: One page monthly written
progress report. Draft written report, 26 weeks after award (2 hard
copies). Final written report, 40 weeks after award (2 hard copies and
one 3.5" floppy disk in DOS, WP 6.1 format). Period of Performance:
From award through 40th week Travel: The contractor or his/her designee
may be required to participate in up to two (2) one to two day
meetings/conferences in the Washington, D.C. area. EVALUATION CRITERIA
Evaluation will be made on the contractor's demonstration of his/her
understanding of the subject matter and on the topics to be discussed,
on the originality and thoughtfulness in responding to the proposal,
and on his/her potential for completing the tasks as well as producing
a high quality report in the time frame specified. 1. Experience-
Provide evidence of training, practice, certification, and publication
of immunological research demonstrating knowledge and competency in
the area of functional immunity, allergy and aberrations,
immunopathology, immune regulation, developmental immunology or
developmental immunotoxicity. 2. Proposal- Prepare a work proposal that
will include a two (2) page writeup demonstrating the breadth and depth
of the contractor's knowledge of the subject matter, ability in
organizing the scope of work and the major subject areas under
discussion, and demonstrating his/her understanding of the specific
concerns raised as part of this acquisition. (The contractor should use
the key concepts found in each of the questions raised in Task 3 to
help guide the development of the 2 page writeup). Prepare a detailed
report outline on the topics to be discussed and as a guide to the
writing of the report, as well as to be used as a basis for EPA's
evaluation of the comprehensiveness of the intended work product. The
two page writeup and outline should allow EPA the opportunity to
evaluate the contractor's understanding of the concepts and problems
with respect to environmental exposures from the standpoint of
developmental immunology, developmental immunotoxicity, subsequent
effects and health consequences. 3. Time Requirement- The proposed work
must be completed within the prescribed time period of 6-9 months,
without provision for an extension. A description of the resource and
level of effort will be needed to help justify the claim for support of
this requirement. See numbered Note 1. Posted 08/06/99 (W-SN364674).
(0218) Loren Data Corp. http://www.ld.com (SYN# 0012 19990810\B-0002.SOL)
B - Special Studies and Analyses - Not R&D Index Page
|
|