|
COMMERCE BUSINESS DAILY ISSUE OF JULY 9,1998 PSA#2133Department of the Navy, Naval Sea Systems Command, 2531 Jefferson Davis
Highway, Arlington, VA 22242-5160 B -- REQUEST FOR INFORMATION: INITIAL ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY
DEMONSTRATIONS [ATD] SOL N00024-98-R-6329 DUE 072098 POC 02632M, Ms.
Traci Mounts, 703-602-7707 The Program Executive Office for Undersea
Warfare [PEO(USW)] in conjunction with the Team Submarine are jointly
soliciting initial Advanced Technology Demonstrations [ATD] to enhance
undersea warfare capabilities of our surface ships and submarines. [An
ATD is a high risk/high payoff 6.3 R&D funded technology demonstration
that has promise of making significant impact on future naval
warfighting or warfighting support capabilities]. A number of concept
summaries in technology areas are listed below. For those concept
summaries considered by the Navy to be highly regarded, early comments
will be provided and prospective teaming will be encouraged with Navy,
industry or academia in anticipation of the Chief of Naval Research
announcement for FY01 ATD concept proposals which is expected to be
issued late July 1998. Participation in this process is mutually
beneficial because it properly focuses prospective proposers in
PEO[USW] and Team Submarine needs, and offers the potential of
strengthening teaming arrangements to improve ATD success and conserve
limited resources. All of the below technologies should consider
reduced Total Ownership Costs, reduced manning, reduced logistics
support, maintenance free missions, reduced complexity, affordability,
improved reliability, design for producibility, and commonality
between surface ships and submarines. Concept summaries not focused on
these specific areas, but addressing other design drivers, will also
be considered. PEO[USW] and Team Submarine technology areas of interest
over the next 3 to 5 years are as follows: Sensors and Processing: 1.
Technologies that lead to reduced USW system manning including those in
the area of sonar processing automation and data fusion improvements
for existing arrays. 2. Affordable conformal active and passive
technologies, bow dome transparencies, telemetry and transduction. 3.
Fiber optic based acoustic sensors and telemetry, and environmental
sensors for potential hull array applications. 4. Technologies to
support "clean hull" and spherical array elimination related to
conformal array program, Mid- Frequency (MF) Active and MF/HF
integration. 5. Affordable handling systems and engineering sensors,
and large volume array (approximately 1,000 sensors). 6. High Frequency
(HF) Active covert/passive ASW technologies including Bi-dynamics. Need
to enhance platform based technologies using existing arrays and
improved sensor HF processing between Unmanned Undersea Vehicles (UUVs)
and weapons. 7. Technologies to provide near real time large area
multi-platform acoustic sensor netting. 8. Technologies that would
allow near real time estimation of acoustic vulnerabilities. 9.
Automated, adaptive technologies for improved detection,
classification, localization and tracking of quiet, low Doppler
submarines throughout the water column. 10. Improved acoustic
detection, classification, localization and tracking performance for
Active sonar. 11. Capability to monitor and estimate on-line
performance for environmental adaptation and systemoptimization. 12.
Improved detection, classification and localization of bottom, moored,
and floating mines in littoral waters. Platforms: 1. Technologies that
lead in the direction of an all-electric ship. Examples would be DC
Homopolar motors, advanced switching devices, circuit breakers,
controllers, and power converters; electrically driven
weapons/payloads, etc. 2. Integrated shock and acoustic isolation
machinery support technologies. 3. Alternatives to active control
systems for Electro-Magnetic signature reduction. 4. Technologies
and/or techniques that lead to reduced manning. 5. Technologies that
lead to reduced maintenance drivers. Examples would be advanced
corrosion resistant materials. 6. Non-skid coatings which do not affect
acoustic properties and improve personnel safety and reduce maintenance
costs. 7. Generalized tools and methods to predict and correct valve
throttling noise phenomena. 8. Improved insulating materials that
combine anti-sweat and damping technologies and improve cost,
maintenance and airborne noise performance. 9. Corrective or new
technologies to reduce electrical system contributions to noise. 10.
Low cost interstage dehydrator for High Pressure Air Compressors. 11.
Technology to reduce requirement for motor generator set cleaning
periodicity and to extend machine life. 12. Technologies allowing long
term substitution of water for oil in hydraulic systems without
equipment degradation. Payloads: 1. Technologies for submarine, air or
surface launched netted sensors. 2. Payloads and launchers technology
that reduce Total Ownership Costs. Concepts may also introduce
processes for efficient and cost effective reconfiguration of launchers
for all type of weapons thus allowing rapid reload and return of the
submarine to sea to meet new mission requirements. 3. Launchers to
increase submarine payload flexibility and elimination of the Torpedo
Room. Demonstration of innovative concepts and technologies to launch
and retrieve, if required, a variety of existing and future payloads.
Concepts under this heading may include flexible, large diameter,
vertical or horizontal launch and retrieval systems as well as
conversion of existing launchers. These systems can be either internal
or external to the submarines pressure hull. These developments should
allow larger payloads than currently possible for submarine launchers;
21" diameter for internal payloads (torpedo tubes) and 25" diameter
for external payloads (Vertical Launch Tubes). 4. Technology to reduce
payloads and launchers launch signatures. Demonstration of innovative
technologies or concepts which reduce or eliminate acoustic and/or
non-acoustic signatures of payload launch evolution. The payload launch
evolution can be considered to include all operations for handling the
payload during launch preparations, launch or expulsion from the
submarine, and initial motion of the payload (e.g. boost of a missile
from a capsule). Concepts under this heading can be modifications to
existing launchers, for example, by replacement of ordnance-based gas
generators with less energetic impulse devices, or completely new
launch mechanisms such as electromagnetic guns or launchers. Concepts
could also include innovative concepts for geographically separating
missile or UAV launch (and therefore associated signatures) from the
submarine by use of leave-behind capsules or other delayed-launch
concepts. 5. Payloads and launchers to expand submarine launch
capabilities. Demonstration of innovative technologies or concepts
which enhance existing submarine capabilities and provide entirely new
capabilities. Concepts under this heading can be enhancements to
existing launchers allowing delivery of new types of weapons or
off-board sensors. 6. Virtual sensor concept for condition based
maintenance technology. 7. Provide payload technologies in the area of
direct, regenerative and energy weapons to expand the submarine role
in naval fire. 8. Technologies which reduce Total Ownership Cost of
torpedoes. 9. Underwater explosive technologies which increaseexplosive
yield while meeting insensitive munitions requirements. C4ISR: 1.
Coherent localization technology. Submit each concept summary in the
following format: (1) Title; (2) OPNAV Sponsor; (3) Navy warfighting or
warfighting support requirement being addressed; (4) ATD goal; (5)
Projected payoff; (6) Concept description; (7) Supporting technology
base status; (8) Technical approach including risk mitigation; (9)
Funding required over the planned execution period of the ATD; (10)
Transition intention; and (11) Relation to Navy acquisition category
programs and insertion windows of opportunity for major Navy programs.
Concept summaries must be UNCLASSIFIED, restricted to three (3) 8 x 11
pages applying no smaller than 12 pitch single spaced type using
Microsoft Word 7.0 or PowerPoint 7.0, and be submitted in electronic
format to <knobler_alan@hq.navsea.navy.mil> no later than close
of business 20 July 1998. Strict confidentiality of proprietary
information is assured to the extent permitted by Federal Law. For your
information, the ATD selection criteria to be used by Chief of Naval
Research is as follows and should be used as a guide in developing
concept summaries: (1) Responsiveness to PEO[USW]/Team Submarine needs;
(2) Potential for PEO and OPNAV sponsor support; (3) Potential for
transition; (4) Potential payoff (e.g. step improvement in performance,
affordability, maintainability, reliability or manpower utilization);
(5) High technical merit and proper risk; (6) Technical feasibility
(include maturity of technology); (7) Completion in 3 years or less;
and (8) Anticipated ATD funding of $15M or less. During ATD selection,
additional consideration should be given to the following
PEO[USW]/Team Submarine criteria: (1) Potential for multiple program,
multiple platform or multiple sponsor support; (2) Not duplicative of
ATDs already being funded or submitted by others; (3) Supportive of
recent program or sponsor initiatives; (4) Revolutionary not
evolutionary technology; (5) Technology that is sufficiently
mature/focused for ATD [6.3] and not properly an earlier [6.2] funded
effort; (6) Not a re-submittal of a previously rejected ATD unless
previous rejection comments are satisfactorily addressed; and (7)
Applicability for both forward and backfit. Please note this is not a
Request For Proposal (RFP) and should not be construed as a commitment
by the Government to issue a solicitation or ultimately award a
contract. No funding will be provided during this phase. Responses will
not be considered proposals, and any costs incurred as a result of
responding to this announcement can not be chargeable to the Government
for reimbursement. Concept summaries will not be returned after
evaluation. Participation in this announcement and subsequent
evaluation process does not preclude or supersede direct participation
in the Navy's Advanced Technology Demonstration process to be
conducted by the Chief of Naval Research. The Navy reserves the right
to comment on all, some, or none of the concepts received in response
to this announcement. Points-of-contact are Steve Caracciolo,
Contracting Officer, SEA 02631, telephone:(703)602-0951 X633, fax:
(703)602-7023, and e-mail: <caracciolo_steve@hq.navsea.navy.mil>;
for PEO[USW] it is Jim Thompson, ASTO, telephone: (703)604-6015 X510,
fax: (703)604-6056, and e-mail:
<thompson_jim@hq.navsea.navy.mil>; and for Team Submarine it is
Ellie Martin, SEA 92D, telephone: (703) 602-7207 X355, fax: (703)
602-6287, and e-mail: <martin_elaine_j@hq.navsea.navy.mil>.
Posted 07/07/98. (0188) Loren Data Corp. http://www.ld.com (SYN# 0018 19980709\B-0011.SOL)
B - Special Studies and Analyses - Not R&D Index Page
|
|