|
COMMERCE BUSINESS DAILY ISSUE OF MARCH 12,1998 PSA#2050Department Of The Navy, Naval Facilities Engineering Command,
Commander, Atlantic Division, Contracts Office, Code 02231, 1510
Gilbert Street, Norfolk, Virginia 23511-2699 C -- I/Q FOR SERVICES IN SUPPORT OF THE NAVY'S OIL POLLUTION RESPONSE
PROGRAM AT VARIOUS LOCATIONS WITHIN THE ATLANTIC DIVISION, NAVAL
FACILITIES ENGINEERING COMMAND'S AREA OF RESPONSIBILITY SOL
N62470-98-R-3555 DUE 041498 POC Bayla L. Mack, 757-322-8271 -- Karla H.
McGrath, Head, Contract Support Branch, 757-322-8270 E-MAIL:
Architect-Engineer, mackbl@efdlant.navfac.navy.mil. Architect-Engineer
or Engineering Services are required for the development of the
following: (1) Facility Response Plans (FRP) under the Oil Pollution
Act of 1990 (OPA 90); (2) Oil and Hazardous Substance (OHS) Spill
Contingency Plans; (3) Overseas OHS Spill Response Plans under the
Final Governing Standards (FGS); (4) Integrated Contingency Plans (ICP)
as developed by the National Response Team's ICP Guidance; (5) OHS
Spill Prevention Control and Countermeasures Plans (SPCC) (when part of
an ICP or other integrated plan); (6) Operations Manuals under 33 CFR
154, subpart B; (7) Drills and Exercises to meet the National
Preparedness for Response Exercise Program (PREP) Guidelines; (8) Navy
On-Scene Coordinator (NOSC) and 29 CFR 1910.120(q) Training; and (9)
Design of OHS Spill Contingency Plan facilities identified by FRPs,
ICPs, OHS spill response plans for overseas, etc. The above services
shall be performed at Various Locations within the Atlantic Division,
Naval Facilities Engineering Command's Area of Responsibility to
includes activities serviced by the Engineering Field Division, North;
Engineering Field Activity, Chesapeake; and Engineering Field
Activity, Mediterranean. The preponderance of work on this contract is
anticipated to occur in the States of Virginia, North Carolina and
West Virginia, and in the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico. However, an
order could be issued in the States of Delaware, Pennsylvania, New
Jersey, New York, Rhode Island, Massachusetts, Maine, Vermont, New
Hampshire, Maryland, and in the District of Columbia; or at locations
under the cognizance of Engineering Field Activity, Mediterranean
(Europe and Bahrain). The contractor's experience, through its own
forces or its consultants, for locations in Virginia, North Carolina,
West Virginia and Puerto Rico will be given greater weight during
selection. The basic requirements for preparing plans include:
Identifying potential sites and high risk areas, determining the degree
of impact of potential spills, assessing the degree of risk to
establish response and prevention priorities, and defining and
coordinating required personnel, resources, and response procedures.
The final plans will establish command policies, define
responsibilities, equipment, resources, and procedures for OHS spill
prevention, preparedness, and response at the Activity. Site drawings
locating high-risk areas, potential critical ecosystems impact areas,
and recommended corrective measures should accompany the final plans.
The A&E must demonstrate his and each key consultant's qualifications
with respect to the published evaluation factors for all services.
Evaluation factors (1) through (6) are of equal importance; factors
(7), (8) and (9) are of lesser importance and will be used as
"tie-breakers" among technically equal firms. Specific evaluation
factors include: (1) Specialized Experience -- Firms will be evaluated
in terms of their past experience in preparing FRPs, OHS spill
prevention and contingency plans; Navy regional NOSC plans; and drills
and exercises. These plans, drills and exercises will be prepared
following current Federal, State, and Navy guidelines; (2) Professional
qualifications and technical competence in the type of work required --
Firms will be evaluated in terms of the staff's: active professional
registration especially in the States of Virginia, North Carolina and
West Virginia, and in the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico; familiarity with
Federal and State (primarily Virginia, North Carolina and Puerto Rico)
regulations, particularly those established by the Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) for Contingency Planning (40 CFR 300, the
National Contingency Plan), Oil Pollution Prevention (40 CFR 112), and
the Oil Pollution Act of 1990; regulations established by the U. S.
Coast Guard (33 CFR 154); regulations established by the State of
Virginia (680-14-07); the National Response Team's Guidance on
Integrated Contingency Plans; the guidelines provided by the National
Preparedness for Response Exercise Program; and standards established
in Chapter 18 of the Final Governing Standards (FSG) for overseas
activities; and experience (with present and other firms) and roles of
staff members specifically on projects addressed in evaluation factor
number one; (3) Ability to perform the work to schedules -- Firms will
be evaluated in terms of impact of this workload on the staff's
projected workload during the contract period. Typically, the firm will
be required to work on two or three Activities concurrently and will be
required to complete field investigations and submit draft plans within
months of a notice to proceed; (4) Past Performance -- Firms will be
evaluated in terms of the firm's quality of work and demonstrated long
term business relationships and repeat business with Government and
private customers; (5) Documented Quality Control Program/Plan -- Firms
will be evaluated on the acceptability of their internal quality
control program used to ensure an accurate product. Submit a written
description outlining methods utilized to assure technically accurate
reports and to assure overall coordination between disciplines; (6)
Demonstrated success in prescribing the use of recovered materials and
achieving waste reduction and energy efficiency in facility design;
(7) Firm location (provided that application of this criterion leaves
an appropriate number of qualified firms, given the nature and size of
the contract); (8) Volume of Work -- Firms will be evaluated in terms
of work previously awarded to the firm by DOD with the objective of
affecting an equitable distribution of DOD A&E contracts among
qualified A&E firms, including small and small disadvantaged business
firms and firms that have not had prior DOD contracts; and (9) Small
Business and Small Disadvantaged Business Subcontracting Plan -- Firms
will be evaluated on the extent to which offerors identify and commit
to small business and to small disadvantaged business, historically
black college and university, or minority institution in performance of
the contract, whether as joint venture, teaming arrangement, or
subcontractor. Firms shall submit their subcontracting plan with the
Standard Form 255. The contract requires that the selected firm have an
on-line access to E-mail via the internet for routine exchange of
correspondence. The duration of the contract will be for one (1) year
from the date of an initial contract award. The proposed contract
includes 2 one (1) year Government options for the same basic
professional skills. The total A&E fee that may be paid under this
contract will not exceed $1,500,000; however, the yearly maximum may
total up to $750,000. No other general notification to firms for other
similar projects performed under this contract will be made. Type of
contract: Firm Fixed Price Indefinite Quantity Contract. Estimated
start date is 1 May 1998. -- Architect-Engineer firms which meet the
requirements described in this announcement are invited to submit
completed Standard Forms (SF) 254 (unless already on file) and 255, U.
S. Government Architect-Engineer Qualifications, to the office shown
above. In Block 10 of the SF 255, discuss why the firm is especially
qualified based upon synopsized evaluation factors; and provide
evidence that your firm is permitted by law to practice the professions
of architecture or engineering, i.e., State registration number. For
selection evaluation factor (1), provide the following information for
only the staff proposed for this work using these column headings:
"NAME", "RELATED PROJECTS WORKED ON", "YEAR", "FIRM", and "TECHNICAL
ROLE". Use Block 10 of the SF 255 to provide any additional information
desired and continue Block 10 narrative discussion on plain bond paper.
All information must be included within the SF 255. Provide a synopsis
of the scope of work, point of contact and telephone number for each
project listed in SF 255 Block 8. Firms shall submit their
subcontracting plan with the SF 255. Firms having a current SF 254 on
file with this office and those responding by 4:00 p.m. EST, 14 April
1998 will be considered. Late responses will be handled in accordance
with FAR 52.215-10. Neither hand carried proposals nor facsimile
responses will be accepted. Firms responding to this advertisement are
requested to submit only one copy of qualification statements. The
qualification statements should clearly indicate the office location
where the work will be performed and the qualifications of the
individuals anticipated to work on the contract and their geographical
location. -- This proposed contract is being solicited on an
unrestricted basis, therefore, replies to this notice are requested
from all business concerns. -- The small business size standard
classification is SIC 8711 ($2,500,000). -- This is not a request for
proposals. Inquiries concerning this project should mention location
and contract number. See Note 24. (0069) Loren Data Corp. http://www.ld.com (SYN# 0023 19980312\C-0005.SOL)
C - Architect and Engineering Services - Construction Index Page
|
|