|
COMMERCE BUSINESS DAILY ISSUE OF SEPTEMBER 3,1996 PSA#1671USAED, SACRAMENTO, ATTN: A-E NEGOTIATIONS SECTION, 1325 J STREET ROOM
1079, SACRAMENTO CA 95814-2922 C -- POTENTIAL FIXED PRICE CONTRACT OF DESIGN/ADAL OF VARIOUS TRAINING
AND INSTRUCTIONAL FACILITIES IN SUPPORT OF SACRAMENTO DISTRICT PROGRAM.
SOL DACA05-96-R-0055 DUE 100796 POC Mr. Ken Parkinson, Unit Leader, A-E
Negotiations Unit,(916) 557-7410. Contracting Officer Judith Grant.
(Site Code DACA05) 1. CONTRACT INFORMATION: Work and services may be
for the design of various training and instructional facilities and
other facilities of a similar mission in support of the Sacramento
District s assigned military design program for various fiscal years.
This may be the only announcement which may lead to the award of A-E
contracts for the design of training and instructional facilities for
the Sacramento district during the next 12 months. A separate
firm-fixed-price contract will be negotiated and awarded for each
project. A list of at least three firms will be selected. When a design
authorization for the first project of this type is received,
negotiations will begin with the top ranked firm. When an authorization
is received for a subsequent project, or if negotiations with a firm
for a project are unsuccessful, negotiations will begin with the next
ranked firm that has not been offered a project for negotiation. If the
list of ranked firms is exhausted, the negotiation cycle will begin
again with the top ranked firm. If the performance of a firm is less
than average, the firm will not be considered for added work during the
cycle. None of the projects have been authorized for design and funds
are not presently available for any contracts. This announcement is
open to all businesses regardless of size. All interested
Architect-Engineers are reminded that in accordance with the provisions
of PL 95-507, they will be expected to place subcontracts to the
maximum practicable extent consistent with the efficient performance of
the contract with small and small disadvantaged firms. If a large
business is selected, it must comply with FAR 52-219.9 regarding the
requirement for a subcontracting plan on that part of the work it plans
to subcontract. The following subcontracting goals are the minimal
acceptable goals to be included in the subcontracting plan. Of the
subcontracted work, 52.5% to small business, 8.8% to small
disadvantaged business (subset of small business), and 3.0% to
woman-owned small businesses (subset of small business). The firms
selected for these contracts will be required to submit a detailed
subcontracting plan at a later date. If the selected firms submit a
plan with lesser goals, it must submit written rationale of why the
above goals were not met. A detailed plan is not required to be
submitted with the SF 255; however, the plans to do so should be
specified in Block 10 of the SF 255. This work will include all
architectural-engineering (A-E) and related services necessary to
complete the design, and A-E services during the construction phase for
these projects. 2. PROJECT INFORMATION: These contracts may include the
design of classrooms, assembly halls, briefing rooms, electronic
training and administration rooms. Supporting services may include
parking walks, curbs and gutters, landscaping, handicap accesses,
building utilities, HVAC, exterior lighting, fire protection/alarm
systems, comprehensive interior designs an topographic survey. If
demolition of existing facilities is required, the design effort with
documents developed for asbestos and/or lead paint removal may be
required. An interactive design process for data gathering may be
utilized. These projects may be designed using the metric design
experience in block 8. The estimated construction costs per project
range from $1,000,000 to approximately $10,000,000. 3. SELECTION
CRITERIA: See Note 24 for general selection process. The selection
criteria are listed below in descending order of importance. Criteria
a through d are primary. Criteria e through g are secondary and will
only be used as tie-breakers among technically equal firms. a.
Specialized experience and technical competence in (1) Design of new
and alteration of training and instructional facilities as listed
above; (2) Design of life safety and fire protection features; (3)
Comprehensive interior design; (4) Asbestos and lead paint surveying;
(5) The contractor shall be responsible for design and drawings using
computer-aided design and drafting (CADD) and delivering the
three-dimensional drawings in Autodesk AutoCAD CADD software, release
12, MS-DOS, version 6.2 using Windows 3.1, electronic digital format.
The Government will only accept the final product for full operation,
without conversion or reformatting, in the Autodesk AutoCAD release 12
format, and on the target platform specified herein. The target
platform is a 486 DX, with DOS version 6.2 operating system with
Windows 3.1. Drawings produced by scanning drawings of record or
containing photographic images shall be delivered in a raster format
compatible with the target platform AutoCAD electronic digital format.
Drawing files shall also be delivered in Computer-aided Acquisition
and Logistic Support (CALS) electronic digital format; (6) The
specifications will be produced either in SPECS INTACT with Standard
Generalized Markup Language (SGML) or other word processing program
compatible with WordPerfect 6.1 using the Corps of Engineers Military
Construction Guide Specifications. Specification files shall also be
delivered in PostScript electronic digital format; (7) Responding firms
must show computer and modem capability for accessing the Criteria
Bulletin Board System (CBBS) and the Automated Review Management System
(ARMS). b. Past performance on DOD and other contracts with respect to
cost control, quality of work and compliance with performance
schedules. c. Qualified professional personnel in the following key
disciplines: Project Manager, Civil Engineer, Mechanical Engineer,
Electrical Engineer, Structural Engineer, Architect, Landscape
Architect, Fire Protection, Interior Designer, Certified Industrial
Hygienist, Cost Estimator, CADD Operator. The evaluation will consider
education, training, registration, overall relevant experience and
longevity with the firm. d. Capacity of firm to accomplish work in the
required time frame including professional qualifications of firm s
staff and consultants to be assigned to the projects pertinent to that
required for these projects. The breadth and size of a firm will be
considered to match the complexity/simplicity of the expected projects.
e. Volume of DoD contract awards in the last 12 months as described
below. f. Location of the firm in the general geographical area of the
Sacramento District s area of responsibility. g. Extent of
participation of small business, small disadvantaged business, woman
owned small business, historically black colleges and universities or
minority institutions in the proposed contract team, measured as a
percentage of the total estimated effort. 4. SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS:
See Note 24 for general submission requirements. Interested
Architect-Engineer firms having the capabilities to perform this work
are invited to submit ONE (1) completed SF 255 (11/92 edition) US
Government Architect-Engineer and Related Services Questionnaire for
Specific Project for themselves and ONE (1) completed of SF 254 (11/92
edition) for themselves and one for each of their subcontractors to
the office shown above, ATTN: A-E Negotiations Unit. In block 7 of the
SF 255 provide resumes for all key team members, whether with the
prime firm or a subcontractor; list specific project experience for key
team members; and indicate the team members role on each listed project
(project manager, architect, design engineer, etc.) In block 9 of the
SF 255, responding firms must indicate the number and amount of fees
awarded on DoD (Army, Navy, and Air Force) contracts during the 12
months prior to this notice, including change orders and supplemental
agreements for the submitting office only. In block 10 of the SF 255,
provide the design quality management plan and organization chart for
the proposed team. A task specific quality control plan must be
prepared and approved by the government as a condition of contract
award, but is not required with this submission. Responses received by
the close of business (4:30 pm) on the closing date will be considered
for selection. If the closing date is a Saturday, Sunday or Federal
Holiday, the deadline is the close of business on the next business
day. No other notification will be made and no further action is
required. Solicitation packages are not provided for A-E contracts.
This is not a request for proposals. All responsible sources may submit
the required SF 255 and SF 254 which shall be considered by the agency.
See Numbered Notes 24 and 26. (0242) Loren Data Corp. http://www.ld.com (SYN# 0021 19960830\C-0007.SOL)
C - Architect and Engineering Services - Construction Index Page
|
|