|
COMMERCE BUSINESS DAILY ISSUE OF AUGUST 23,1995 PSA#1416Director, U.S. Army Research Laboratory, ATTN: AMSRL-OP-PR-WS, White
Sands Missile Range, NM 88002-5501 B -- B--SPECIAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS SOL DAAL01-95-Q-2001 DUE 090695
POC Lucy M. Escudero, Contraact Specialist, 505/678-6085 or Contracting
Officer, Barbara L. Minto, 505/678-8566. The Procurement Branch-WS,
U.S. Army Research Laboratory is soliciting quotes for the purchase of
services that include the following: BACKGROUND: Nearly two and three
quarter years ago the Survivability Lethality Analysis Directorate
(SLAD) of the U.S. Army Research Laboratory(ARL) began a development
effort which has resulted in the SLAD PD (SLAD Program Database).
Originally conceived as a management tool to facilitate the formulation
of the Directorate's Budget Year Program, the PD has continued to
evolve. In its latest iteration significant capabilities have been
added to allow execution of the planned program. The concept for the PD
has been expressed through a series of templates -- Work Package,
Procurement, and Transfer. Central to the database is the Work Package
template in two forms -- planning and execution -- consisting of four
and two screens, respectively. In the Planning Work Package (PWP)
these screens carry the basic flags, financial breakout, narrative
description, and associated deliverables. A fundamental premise guiding
the development of the SLAD PD has been its focus on the ultimate end
user, the Directorate's scientists and engineers. All major design
considerations have answered this criteria--What is its value to the
technical user? SCOPE: The SLAD of the ARL has a requirement to review,
evaluate and validate the development and implementation of the SLAD
PD. This requirement includes the validation of the existing hardware
and software ability to meet the design criteria and potential to
provide support to an increasing user base throughout the ARL
Directorates. It includes survey of marketplace options to the database
with associated costs and time to implement and the development of
specifications to define optional hardware/software solutions. GENERAL
INFORMATION: The initialization of the PD arose from exigencies of
time and financial resource, which dictated certain development paths.
Existing contracts drove the selection of host computer (SGI 4D/440S),
relational database management system (Informix On- Line), and
programming language (Informix SQL and 4GL). While the resulting SLAD
PD can in all likelihood meet the needs of the Directorate's 350
employees, its success has moved it to forefront as a candidate for an
integrated database environment for the entire ARL. The question now
arises, can an environment designed to support 350 users be effectively
and efficiently scaled up to meet the needs of potentially 2,800 users.
Complicating such a transformation--on key points continued development
may not be possible. The existing development system is the latest for
the platform, but is two releases behind the most current version.
(Informix On- Line 5.0, the system on hand, has minimal database
replicative capability in a dual site mode, Informix On-Line 7.0 does,
dual site operations was a basic design goal of the PD, multisite
generation may be a critical requirement for ARL wide PD use).
REQUIREMENTS: 1. Validate the SLAD PD's ability to meet design
criteria. Design criteria documentation shall be reviewed and
validation shall be performed to determine if the criteria can be met
with the existing host computer (SGI 4D/440S), relational database
management system (Informix On-Line 5.0) and programming language
(Informix SQL and 4GL). 2. Determine the SLAD PD's suitability (as
developed) for extension to all ARL Directorates. The question arises
as to whether an environment designed to support 350 users can be
reasonably scaled up to meed the needs of 2800. Originally intended for
the White Sands Missile Range, NM site, support is now required for
sites at Aberdeen Proving Grounds, Edgewood and Adelphi, Maryland, as
well as Fort Monmouth, New Jersey. 3. Assess current database
hardware/software configuration to quantify its limits. The system's
ability to accept the addition of necessary capabilities such as
electronic procurement, automated travel orders and other such
market-based enhancements. 4. Survey marketplace for database
hardware/software options (with associated costs in time and dollars to
implement) to existing database. Evaluate alternatives to the current
hardware/software configurations based on industry trends. 5. Develop
specifications necessary to define optional hardware/software
solutions. This requirement is for a basic period and one option. 160
hours Program Database Validation Support to include travel for one
trip, with an option period for an additional 160 hours support with
travel for one trip. THIS IS A REQUEST FOR QUOTATIONS (RFQ). THERE WILL
BE NO FORMAL RFQ. The Government reserves the right to make no award at
all. The Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) for this requirement
is 7379, and the size standard is $18M. SUBMIT QUOTES IN WRITING TO
THE ADDRESS SHOWN ABOVE OR VIA FAX AT (505) 678-4812 not later than 15
days after publication of this notice. Quotes shall indicate business
classification, i.e., small, disadvantaged, women-owned, large. Prices
shall include applicable Federal, State, and local taxes. Quotes shall
indicate payment terms. The Government will not pay for any effort
expended in responding to this synopsis. (0233) Loren Data Corp. http://www.ld.com (SYN# 0006 19950822\B-0001.SOL)
B - Special Studies and Analyses - Not R&D Index Page
|
|