|
COMMERCE BUSINESS DAILY ISSUE OF APRIL 3,1995 PSA#1316WL/AAKR, Bldg. 7 2530 C Street Wright Patterson AFB, OH 45433-7607 A -- ADAPTIVE PROCESSING TECHNOLOGY INVESTIGATION. PART 1 OF 2. SOL
PRDA 95-07-AAK DUE 051695 POC Dawn M. Ross, Contract Negotiator,
513-255-6908. A--INTRODUCTION: Wright Laboratory (WL/AAKR) is
interested in receiving proposals (technical and cost) on the research
effort described below. Proposals in response to this PRDA shall be
submitted by 16 May 95, 1500 hours Daylight Savings time, to Wright
Laboratory, Directorate of R&D Contracting, Building 7, Area B, 2530 C
Street, ATTN: Dawn Ross, WL/AAKR, Wright-Patterson AFB OH 45433-7607.
This is an unrestricted solicitation. Proposals submitted shall be in
accordance with this announcement. Proposals receipt after the cutoff
date and time specified herein shall be treated in accordance with
restriction of FAR 52.215-10, copy of this provision may be obtained
from the contracting point of contact. There will be no other
solicitation issued in regard to this requirement. Offerors should be
alert for any amendments that may change this PRDA or permit subsequent
submission of proposal dates. Offerors should request a copy of the WL
Guide entitled, ''PRDA and BAA Guide for Industry.'' This guide was
specially designed to assist offerors in understanding the PRDA/BAA
proposal process. Copies may be requested from the contracting officer
cited in this announcement. B--REQUIREMENTS: (1) Technical
Description: a) Background/Problem. Operational deficiencies exist in
the ability of X-band air-to-air fire control radar to both detect and
spatially locate (target acquisition) conventional and low observable
(LO) fighter and cruise missile threats in difficult barrage noise
jamming and/or ground clutter environments. Future USAF stealthy
aircraft may utilize body fixed, electronically steered array (ESA),
radar architectures to allow installation of the forward looking
antenna with low radar cross-section (RCS). The array's low RCS
installation may, however, degrade its radiation pattern and thereby
increase the radar's susceptibility to jamming and clutter
interference, b) Objective: Adaptive processing technology affords the
potential of enabling fighter radar systems to acquire and track
airborne targets in the anticipated counter LO (CLO) clutter and main
beam and sidelobe jamming electronic counter measure (ECM) operational
scenarios if certain crucial phenomenological issues can be resolved
and solutions that have practical, cost-effective, radar architectural
implementations can be formulated. Foremost among the many
interference mitigation problems are: 1) suppression of pulse Doppler
radar, all target aspect angle, medium pulse repetition frequency (PRF)
mode directly competing sidelobe, and spread main beam ground clutter,
and 2) the susceptibility of the narrow bandwidth high and medium PRF
acquisition and track and wide bandwidth air-to-air target recognition
high range resolution (HRR) mode waveforms to both main beam escort and
sidelobe standoff jammers. The crucial phenomenologies greatly
exacerbating interference suppression are radome multipath internal
reflections (RMR) and radar antenna main beam ground footprint incident
terrain scattered jamming interference (TSI). Recent WL/AARM sponsored
research efforts have quantified the target signal-to-thermal noise
ratio degradations due to ground clutter and ECM interference in the
presence of the RMR and TSI phenomenologies and formulated various
adaptive processing radar architectures that appear conceptually
capable of canceling the undesired interference. The objective of this
effort is to continue the evolution of the various adaptive
technologies for interference cancellation, such as, adaptive main beam
canceller (AMBC), adaptive sidelobe canceller (ASLC) jammer, space-time
adaptive processing (STAP) joint jammer and clutter cancellation, and
RMR and TSI cancellation. The objective of this effort also includes
the demonstration of the mitigation capabilities of the aforementioned
adaptive technologies corresponding to their practical implementation
in both contemporary and future USAF fighter CLO weapon systems
operating in search, target acquisition, track and non-cooperative
target recognition (NCTR) modes, c) Approach: The contractor shall
identify and investigate one or more high military utility AMBC, ASLC,
STAP, RMR, or TSI (including terrain bounce relevant to degradations
in air-to-air missile launch and its mid-course guidance/trajectory
shaping) interference mitigation solutions to the high (PRF), medium
PRF, and/or NCTR air-to-air radar modes. The adaptive processing
techniques used shall enable both target detection and its accurate
spatial location. The adaptive processing technologies/algorithms must
have associated air-to-air radar architectures and hardware/software
implementations of limited complexities such that they are realistic
candidates for both antenna range and flight test data
collection/ground processing concept validation experiments. Early and
late adaptive processing technology investigation (APTI) program
flight test experiments are to be conducted for exploring near-term
contemporary fighter radar upgrades and the merits of the far-term
adaptive processing radar architectures, respectively. The near-term
contemporary fighter radar upgrade flight experiments will address the
RMR, TSI, and other phenomenological issues and the interference
suppression level possible in the context of four beam monopulse
antenna/four receiver channel architectures. The far-term radar
experiments will address the capability of a multiplicity of adaptive
processing beam and sub-array spatial pulse repetition frequency (PRI)
and tap delay line (TAP) temporal, and Doppler degrees-of-freedom
(DOF) to restore radar performance to its ideal thermal noise limit.
High fidelity environmental/tactical scenario and sophisticated digital
computer radar simulations are to be utilized to develop and/or extend
the adaptive processing techniques and predict the performance of the
evolving algorithms prior to conduct of the flight and/or ground
experiments. (2) Deliverable Items: The following deliverable items
shall be required: (a) Status Report, DI-A-MGMT-81368/T, monthly, (b)
Project Planning Chart, DI-MGMT-80507A/T, monthly, (c) Contract Funds
Status (CFSR), DI-F-6004B/T, quarterly, (d) Scientific and Technical
Reports, Contractor's Billing Voucher DI-MISC-30593/T, monthly, (e)
Scientific and Technical Reports, DI-MISC-80711/T (Draft and
Reproducible Final), including as a minimum the rationale, objective,
assumptions, analytic methods/models, algorithms (including
mathematical representation), and procedures supporting the radar
adaptive processing architectures/techniques design, (f) Presentation
Material, DI-81373/T, the contractor shall be required to give a
kick-off meeting at the contractor's facility within forty-five (45)
days after contract award, and informal technical meetings held
quarterly alternating between WPAFB and the Contractor's facility, (g)
Program Plan, DI-MGMT-80909/T, (h) Conference Minutes, DI-
ADMN-81250A/T, (i) Conference Agenda, DI-ADMN-81249A/T, (j) Contract
Status Schedule Report (CSSR) DI-F-6010A/T, (k) Contract Work Breakdown
Schedule (CWBS) DI-MGMT-81334, (l) All simulations and software that
may be developed by the contractor in support of this effort will be
deliverables under this program (in contractor's format), (l) Flight as
well as ground collected data, and ground processed data, to support
this effort, will be deliverables (in contractors' format) under this
program also. (3) Security Requirements: TEMPEST requirements will
apply. Generation of classified material for this effort will be
authorized only on equipment approved for classified processing by Air
Force TEMPEST authorities. (4) Other Special Requirements:
International in Arms Regulations apply. End of Part 1. (0089) Loren Data Corp. http://www.ld.com (SYN# 0006 19950331\A-0006.SOL)
A - Research and Development Index Page
|
|