|
COMMERCE BUSINESS DAILY ISSUE OF MARCH 3,1995 PSA#1295Atlantic Division, Naval Facilities Engineering Command, 1510 Gilbert
Street, Norfolk, Virginia 23511-2699 (Attention: Code 02231) C -- INDEFINITE QUANTITY CONTRACT FOR DESIGN SERVICES FOR WATER
QUALITY PROJECTS WITHIN STATESIDE AREAS UNDER THE COGNIZANCE OF THE
ATLANTIC DIVISION, NAVAL FACILITIES ENGINEERING COMMAND SOL
N62470-95-R-6002 POC Contact Miss Bayla Mack, 804-444-9676/Mr. Dean
Koepp, Head, Contract Support Branch, 804-444-9582 Architect-Engineer
or Engineering Services are required for preparation of project
documentation, plans, specifications, cost estimates, related studies,
and all associated engineering services for design solutions to
address Wastewater type WaterQuality Issues. Tasks will include, but
are not limited to: Wastewater treatment plant, pump station and plant
control evaluations and subsequent design upgrades and improvements;
design solutions to correct illicit discharges to sanitary and
stormsewers; evaluation and design of pump station upgrades; wash rack
modifications, evaluation and design of pretreatment and pollution
prevention control systems related to industrial wastewaters;
pretreatment, certificate to construct/non-discharge type,and National
Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit application
preparation; associated laboratory support for wastewater, stormwater
and residual characterizations; treatability study determination; and
Oily Waste/Waste Oil (OWWO)handling and treatment facility design at
activities located within the Atlantic Division, Naval Facilities
Engineering Command's Stateside Geographic Area (including Engineering
Field Activity, Chesapeake and Engineering Field Division, North
areas).The Government will reserve an option to negotiate post
construction award services (PCAS) to include Operation and Maintenance
Support Information (OMSI) Manuals, the preparation of manuals required
by environmental regulators, shop drawing review,preparation of
as-built drawings, and construction surveillance services (Title II).
The A&E must demonstrate his and each key consultant's qualifications
with respect to the published evaluation factors for all services.
Evaluation factors (1)through (5) are of equal importance; factors (6),
(7) and (8) are of lesser importance. Specific evaluation factors
include: (1) Specialized Experience - Firms will be evaluated in terms
of previous experience of the firm in preparation of Departmentof
Defense Project Documentation, Pretreatment and NPDES environmental
permit applications and application for the construction of wastewater
facilities; design of pretreatment/pollution prevention facilities to
control industrial wastewaters and minorupgrades and improvements to
domestic treatment works, instrumentation design improvements for
wastewater treatment processes; process treatability studies, and the
firm's capability to perform wastewater sampling, testing, and
interpret laboratoryresults; (2) Professional qualifications, technical
competence and experience of the staff to accomplish the designs and
studies outlined in evaluation factor 1 above - Firms will be evaluated
in terms of (a) active professional registration of thetechnical staff;
and (b) the proposed team's management approach to successfully
completing tasks under this contract including their demonstrated work
experience with key consultants on similar projects; (3) Capability to
provide qualified backup stafffor key personnel to ensure continuity of
services and ability to complete at least 4 tasks simultaneously,
including designs and studies, in 6 month timeframes; (3) Ability to
perform the work to schedules and capacity and approach to perform at
least4 tasks simultaneously including designs and studies - Firms will
be evaluated in terms of impact of this workload on the staff's
projected workload during the contract period; (4) Past Performance -
Firms will be evaluated in terms of their pastperformance with this
Command and other DOD agencies and private companies in terms of
demonstrated long term business relationships and repeat business (with
emphasis on projects addressed in factor 1). Firms will also be
evaluated in terms ofdemonstrated history of meeting performance
schedules; (5) Quality Control Program - Firms will be evaluated on the
acceptability of their internal quality control program used to assess
technical accuracy in reports, calculations, drawings,
andspecifications to assure overall coordination between engineering
and technical disciplines, and their means of ensuring quality services
from their consultants; (6) Firm location and knowledge of the locality
of the contract (provided that applicationof this criterion leaves an
appropriate number of qualified firms, given the nature and size of the
contract) - Firms will be evaluated on their location with respect to
the general geographical area of the contract and their knowledge of
local codes,laws, permits and construction materials and practices of
the area; (7) Volume of Work - Firms will be evaluated in terms of work
previously awarded to the firm by DOD with the objective of affecting
an equitable distribution of DOD A&E contracts amongqualified A&E
firms, including small and small disadvantaged business firms and firms
that have not had prior DOD contracts; and (8) Small Business and Small
Disadvantaged Business Subcontracting Plan - Firms will be evaluated on
the extent to whichofferors identify and commit to small business and
to small disadvantaged business, historically black college and
university, or minority institution in performance of the contract,
whether as joint venture, teaming arrangement, or subcontractor.Firms
are required to prepare the cost estimate utilizing the computerized
CES, when applicable, and the specifications in the SPECSINTACT system
format. Digital Graphics database of any site survey may be required.
If so, the survey, and all drawingsforming a part thereof, shall be
submitted in an AutoCAD compatible format, either DXF or .DWG, on DOS
high density floppy disks. The design contract scope may require
evaluation and definition of asbestos materials and toxic waste
disposition. Feenegotiations would provide for laboratory testing and
subsequent preparation of plans and specifications may require
definition of removal and/or definition of disposal process. Firms
responding to this announcement must be prepared to accept
theaforementioned as a part of their contract responsibility. The
duration of the contract will be for one (1) year from the date of an
initial contract award. The proposed contract includes a one (1) year
Government option for the same basicprofessional skills. Subject to
necessary changes, the total A&E fee that may be paid under this
contract will not exceed $1,000,000. No other general notification to
firms for other similar projects performed under this contract will be
made. Typeof contract: Firm Fixed Price Indefinite Quantity Contract.
Estimated start date is June 1995.--Architect-Engineer firms which
meet the requirements described in this announcement are invited to
submit completed Standard Forms (SF) 254 (unless alreadyon file) and
255, U. S. Government Architect-Engineer Qualifications, to the office
shown above. In Block 10 of the SF 255, discuss why the firm is
especially qualified based upon synopsized evaluation factors; and
provide evidence that your firm ispermitted by law to practice the
professions of architecture or engineering, i.e., State registration
number. For selection evaluation factor (1), provide the following
information for only the staff proposed for this work using these
column headings:''NAME'', ''RELATED PROJECTS WORKED ON'', ''YEAR'',
''FIRM'', and ''TECHNICAL ROLE''. Use Block 10 of the SF 255 to provide
any additional information desired and continue Block 10 narrative
discussion on plain bond paper. All information must be includedwithin
the SF 255 (limited to 30 pages (front and back considered 1
page)--not less than 10 point font; every page that is not an SF 254
will be included in the 30 page count); cover letter and other
attachments will not be considered in the evaluationprocess. Provide a
synopsis of the scope of work, point of contact and telephone number
for each project listed in SF 255 Block 8. Firms having a current SF
254 on file with this office and those responding by 4:00 p.m. EST, 6
April 1995 will beconsidered. Late responses will be handled in
accordance with FAR 52.215-10. Neither hand carried proposals nor
facsimile responses will be accepted. Firms responding to this
advertisement are requested to submit only one copy of
qualificationstatements. The qualification statements should clearly
indicate the office location where the work will be performed and the
qualifications of the individuals anticipated to work on the contract
and their geographical location.--This proposed contractis being
solicited on an unrestricted basis, therefore, replies to this notice
are requested from all business concerns. Before award of contract, the
Architect-Engineer (if not a Small Business concern) shall agree in the
contract, by incorporation ofan acceptable small business and small
disadvantaged business subcontracting plan in accordance with FAR Part
19.7, that small business concerns and small disadvantaged business
concerns shall have the maximum practicable opportunity to participate
incontract performance consistent with its efficient performance.--The
small business size standard classification is SIC 8711
($2,500,000).--This is not a request for proposals. Inquiries
concerning this project should mention location and contractnumber. See
Note 24. (0060) Loren Data Corp. http://www.ld.com (SYN# 0024 19950302\C-0002.SOL)
C - Architect and Engineering Services - Construction Index Page
|
|