|
COMMERCE BUSINESS DAILY ISSUE OF FEBRUARY 8,1995 PSA#1279US Army Engineer Division, Huntsville, ATTN: CEHND-PM-AE, PO Box 1600,
4820 University Square, Huntsville, Alabama 35816-1822 C -- INDEF DELIVERY/INDEF QUANTITY CONTRACT FOR TITLE I & II SERVICES
FOR A-E ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION SERVICES UNDER DERP AT SENECA ARMY
DEPOT ACTIVITY, NEW YORK POC Patricia Newman, Contract Specialist, or
Danny J. Biggs, Contracting Officer, 205-895-1383. Architect-Engineer
(A-E) services are required to meet the re- quirements of Federal and
State regulations for the remediation of Hazardous, Toxic and
Radiological Waste (HTRW)/Ordnance and Explosive Waste (OEW) for all
phases of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and
Liability Act (CERCLA) (including Superfund Amendments and
Reauthorization Act (SARA) of 1986), all phases of Resource
Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) (including Hazardous and Solid
Waste Amendments of 1984), National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA),
Clean Water Act, Clean Air Act and Clean Air Act Amendments, Toxic
Substances Control Act (TSCA), Safe Drinking Water Act, and other
appropriate Federal and State regulations that are applicable to
environmental restoration activities at Seneca Army Depot Activity
(SEDA), New York. This announcement is open to all businesses
regardless of size. TITLE I services are expected to include, but will
not be limited to: technical report preparation (e.g. workplans,
remedial investigation/feasibility studies, RCRA Facility
Assessments/Investigations), sampling/analysis for environmental
clean-up, engineering evaluations/cost analysis, removal action/interim
measure design, remedial action designs, groundwater modeling (two
dimensional and three dimensional), laboratory analysis, data
validation, preparation of baseline risk assessments, assistance with
community relations and fulfillment of public participation
requirements, bench treatability studies, implementation of pilot-scale
treatment studies and characterization and disposal of investigation
derived wastes. TITLE II services for remedial actions and removal
actions/corrective measures are expected to include, but will not be
limited to: supervision and inspection of construction, review of shop
drawings, construction schedules and sequencing, design changes to
incorporate existing site conditions, preparation of operation and
maintenance manuals, and engineering and design during construction. A
one year indefinite delivery/indefinite quantity contract with four
one year options will be negotiated for these services (total of five
years). This contract will have the capability to issue
Cost-Plus-Fixed-Fee (CPFF) delivery orders. The maximum individual
delivery order limit will be $3 million, and there will be a total
contract limit of $55 million ($15 million basic year, $15 million for
each of the first two option years and $5 million for each of the last
two option years). The Government's minimum obligation is two percent
of the stated maximum or $500,000, which ever is less, in base year,
and one percent of the stated maximum or $250,000, or whichever is
less, in each option year. Funds for this minimum obligation will be
available by the time of contract award. In order to be considered for
selection of this contract, interested firms must submit an SF 254/255
(11/92 editions only). The Government reserves the right to synopsize
and award contracts for similar work at this site. One of the main
reasons this might be done includes, but is not limited to, an instance
when the Government Estimate for a project exceeds the established
contract limits and a project must be started prior to the next
contract ordering period becoming effective if the current delivery
order limits have been achieved. The performance period for this
contract is estimated to be from April 1995 through April 2000. There
is no guarantee that any delivery orders will be issued under the basic
contract or any of the contract option years in excess of the minimum
guarantees. Since engineering design may be required under this
contract, responding firms must be capable of providing design drawings
on a computer-aided design and drafting (CADD) system. All final
drawings will be computer-generated, plotted and provided in a format
and medium that will permit their loading, storage and use without
modification or additional software on the Huntsville Division graphics
system. The Huntsville Division graphics system consists of INTERGRAPH
Corporation supplied workstations running Microstation Version 5.0,
Project Architect, Project Layout, Modular GIS Environment (MGE)
software products, Inroads and InXpress software with data input
required on either a 9-track, 1600 BPI tape drive, 2.3 GB or 5 GB 8mm
data cartridge, 3.5 inch 1.4 mbyte floppy disk and a 5 1/4 inch 1.2
mbyte floppy disk. State the CADD system to be used and demonstratehow
it is compatible with the Huntsville Division sys- tem. The final tape
submitted by the A-E shall be delivered on 9-track, 1600 BPI, Odd
Parity, ASCII computer magnetic tape and must be capable of being
directly loaded into CEHND's Intergraph system without modification or
loss of data. Since large amounts of environmental quality data may
need to be interpreted and managed under this project, responding firms
must be capable of utilizing a Geographical Information System (GIS) to
record these data for interpretation and management. Responding firms
must, as part of their response, demonstrate how their system will be
made compatible with CEHND's graphic system. Firms failing to submit
information on how they will achieve complete CADD and GIS
compatibility with CEHND's system will not be considered. The A-E must
clearly identify the responsible engineer-in-charge,
geologist-in-charge, staff personnel and subcontractors intended to
perform the work. Work may be in controlled access areas and all
personnel working on the project must be U.S. citizens capable of being
badged and cleared on the facility. SELECTION CRITERIA: The following
evaluation criteria for this proposed contract are mandatory and
relatable to the factors in Note 24. (1) SPECIALIZED EXPERIENCE and
TECHNICAL COMPETENCE IN TYPE OF WORK REQUIRED: SUBFACTORS: (a)
Demonstrated experience and capability in performing necessary steps
for remediation under DERP, CERCLA and RCRA which include, but are not
limited to: work plan preparation, competence in environmental
sampling methodology (installation of monitoring wells, soil borings,
etc.), field sampling and analysis (field screening and laboratory
analysis), data validation and management, report preparation (remedial
investigation, baseline risk assessment, feasibility study, proposed
plan, record of decision, engineering evaluation/cost analysis, etc.).
(b) Demonstrated experience in sampling and analysis of water, soil,
air, and hazardous, toxic and radiological waste using USEPA Region
II/New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC)-
approved methods and protocols. (c) Demonstrated experience in the
overall management (collection, storage and disposal,etc.) of
investigation-derived wastes (IDW) according to EPA II/NYSDEC
requirements. (d) Demonstrated experience in working directly (or
indirectly, through the client) with NYSDEC and EPA Region II with
regard to responding to and rectifying regulatory concerns. (e)
Demonstrated experience and ability to design and prepare construction
plans and specifications for groundwater and soil treatment
facilities. Design of remedial actions and interim measures/removal
actions to meet current criteria and standards. (f) Ability to perform
numerical, multi-media (air, water, soil, groundwater) environmental
modeling. Of particular importance are groundwater models including
both groundwater flow modeling and contamination transport modeling
(two dimensional and three dimensional modeling). (g) Demonstrated
experience in preparing construction plans and specifications
conforming to Federal Government requirements. (h) Knowledge of
Department of Defense, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA),
and State of New York regulations pertaining to RCRA corrective
measures, CERCLA remedial actions and removal actions,
environmentaldocumentation, quality assurance, environmental sampling,
and engineering design. (i) Demonstrated experience in performing
pilot-scale groundwater, surface water, and soil treatment studies. (j)
Past experience in performing CERCLA risk assessments according to
USEPA requirements. (k) Construction cost estimating and preparation of
estimates on IBM-compatible personal computers using Corps of Engineers
Computer Aided Cost Estimating System (MCACES) (software provided) or
similar software. (l) Ability to produce design drawings compatible
with CEHND system and utilize GIS to manage and interpret environmental
data. (m) Interested firms must demonstrate that they have the
capability to implement the supervision and inspection of construction,
review of shop drawings, construction schedules and sequencing, design
changes to incorporate existing site conditions, preparation of
operation and maintenance manuals, and engineering and design during
construction. (2) PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS NECESSARY for
SATISFACTORY PERFORMANCE OF REQUIRED SERVICES: SUBFACTORS: (a)
Multidisciplinary engineering team, including professionals registered
in the engineering disciplines of architecture, civil, geotechnical,
geological, structural, chemical, mechanical, electrical, and
environmental engineering. The supervising engineer of the project must
be a registered professional engineer or be capable of being registered
at the time of the individual delivery order award in the State of New
York. (b) Effective organizational structure and project team
management plan addressing how the various prime, subcontractor, and/or
joint venture participants will function as a cohesive unit and how the
team will be centrally managed to assure successful completion of this
contract. (c) Experience or expertise in the disciplines of geology
and hydrogeology, including a hydrogeologist with a minimum of five
years of direct experience with 3D numerical computer modeling methods,
who will directly supervise the modeling. (d) Multi-disciplinary
environmental health and science team, with experience and expertise in
the disciplines of chemistry, biology, public health, industrial
hygiene, health physics, toxicoloy, environmental science, safety, cost
estimating, surveying, project management, and construction management.
A Certified Industrial Hygienist with experience in hazardous waste
site operations is required. This project will require a matrixed team
of experienced environmental professionals. (e) Team expertise in
explosive ordnance detection and disposal. Team members must be
graduates of the Naval Explosive Ordnance Disposal (EOD) school,
Indianhead, Maryland (minimum qualifications: senior UXO supervisor -
15 years, UXO supervisor, safety officer and QC specialist - 10 years
and UXO specialists - 3 years). (f) The analytical laboratory must be
validated at the time of submission or by the time of award by the
Missouri River Division, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, meet USEPA
Region II and New York State Department of Environmental Conservation
(NYSDEC) CLP criteria, and meet any other special criteria required by
the State of New York. (3) CAPACITY TO AC- COMPLISH THE WORK IN THE
REQUIRED TIME. SUBFACTOR: Interested firms must demonstrate that they
have in-house capacity, or adequate resources in-house supplemented by
subcontract or joint venture forces, to perform work on several
operable units simultaneously and meet enforceable deadlines set by the
U.S. EPA and the State of New York. (4) PAST PERFORMANCE ON CONTRACTS
WITH GOVERNMENT AGENCIES and PRIVATE INDUSTRY IN TERMS OF COST CONTROL,
QUALITY of WORK, AND COMPLIANCE WITH PERFORMANCE SCHEDULES. Since the
proposed contract type is cost plus fixed fee (CPFF), cost control is
of prime importance in the evaluation of this contract. Unsatisfactory
or marginally unsatisfactory past performance evaluations (poor or
below average) in the above areas will play a role in a firms ability
to be selected for this project. (5) LOCATION OF THE CONTRACTOR in THE
GENERAL GEOGRAPHIC REGION WHERE THE WORK WILL be PERFORMED, PROVIDED
THAT APPLICATION of THE CRITERION LEAVES AN APPROPRIATE NUMBER OF
QUALIFIED FIRMS, GIVEN the NATURE AND SIZE OF THIS PROJECT. SUBFACTOR:
Location of contractor in the general geographic region of the United
States where the work will be performed will be considered to minimize
travel costs on this project and maximize availability of on-site
assistance in support of the installation restoration program at SEDA.
Interested firms should clearly state which office(s) that would be
utilized (to include locations of subcontractors) to perform the work
for this contract. (6) VOLUME of WORK AWARDED BY DOD DURING THE
PREVIOUS 12 MONTHS: SUBFACTOR: Equitable distribution of work among A-E
firms, including small and disadvantaged business firms and firms that
have not had prior DOD contracts, will be a consideration of the
Selection Board. This contract is not set-aside under either of these
criteria, however, responding large business firms are urged to
consider seriously the award of subcontracts to small disadvantaged and
other small business firms. In determining the value of DOD awards over
the past 12 months, awards to overseas offices for projects outside the
United States, its territories and possessions, a subsidiary, if not
normally subject to management decisions and bookkeeping, that operates
under a firm name different from the parent company will not be
considered. The relative importance of factors and subfactors follow.
Factor 1 is the most important factor for award and is one-and-one half
times as important as Factor 2. Factor 2 is twice as important as
Factor 3. Factor 3 is twice as important as Factors 4 and 5 which are
of equal importance. Factors 4 and 5 are twice as important as Factor
6. Subfactors a and b under Factor 1 are of equal importance and are
somewhat more important than subfactors c and d, which are equal in
importance. Subfactors c and d are roughly three times as important as
subfactors e through m, which are of equal importance. Subfactors a
and b under Factor 2 are of equal importance and twice as important as
subfactors c, d, e and f, which are of equal importance. Interested
firms having the capabilities to perform this work must submit one copy
of SF 255 for prime and one copy of SF 254 for prime and each
consultant. SF 255 must include an organization chart for the proposed
team, and the names and telephone numbers of clients as references on
the five most recent environmental investigation or remediation
projects. Interested firms are requested to state in Block 10 of the SF
255 the value of all A-E contract awards to the firm, including
modifications, by the Department of Defense during the previous 12
month period as of the date of this announcement. Submittals must be
received at the address indicated above not later than close of
business 30 calendar days from the publication date of this
announcement with ''Day 1'' being the next day after publication. If
sending submittal by overnight express, the street address and zip code
is 4820 University Square, Huntsville, Alabama 35816-1822. This is not
a request for proposal. See Note 24 which is printed on the back of
every Monday issue of this publication. (0037) Loren Data Corp. http://www.ld.com (SYN# 0035 19950207\C-0016.SOL)
C - Architect and Engineering Services - Construction Index Page
|
|