SOURCES SOUGHT
99 -- NASA/GSFC Sources Sought for Space Radiation Modeling And Simulation For Radiation Hardened Silicon Carbide (Sic) Power Devices
- Notice Date
- 6/1/2020 12:37:20 PM
- Notice Type
- Sources Sought
- Contracting Office
- NASA GODDARD SPACE FLIGHT CENTER GREENBELT MD 20771 USA
- ZIP Code
- 20771
- Solicitation Number
- NASA-GSFC-Space-Radiation-Modeling-Simulation-Radiation-Hardened-Silicon-Carbide-Power-Devices
- Response Due
- 6/15/2020 2:00:00 PM
- Archive Date
- 06/30/2020
- Point of Contact
- Irene Bibyk, Phone: 3012866803
- E-Mail Address
-
irene.bibyk@nasa.gov
(irene.bibyk@nasa.gov)
- Description
- 1.0 Introduction and Scope ���� ����NASA/GSFC is seeking partners to propose in response to NASA Space Technology Mission Directorate (STMD) Early Career Initiative (ECI) opportunity.��NASA/GSFC is interested in partners that can collaborate on the development of highly innovative space hardware technologies that includes hands-on development and testing. ���� ����The project team will be led by NASA/GSFC early career civil servant employees and include any combination of highly qualified external partner(s).��Proposing core teams will include one to four NASA civil servants and no more than two external partners (e.g., from academic, commercial, other government agencies, etc.).��Teams must propose innovative space hardware-focused projects lasting no more than 2 years and costing no more than $300K in procurements per year.��The general approach will be milestone-based with a continuation review after the first year and a final presentation to NASA Headquarters in the last year. ���� ����For this partnership opportunity dealing with the preparation of ECI proposals, there will be no exchange of funds between the partnering team(s). ���� ����Responses to this notice will serve as the basis for selection of proposal partners for ECI. ���� ���� ����2. Technical Objectives ���� NASA Goddard (GSFC) seeks to develop radiation hardened silicon carbide (SiC) power devices (Schottky diodes and MOSFETs) for use in lunar environments.� The devices shall be designed to experience no catastrophic Single Event Effects (SEE) at or below 1200 Volts with irradiation at Linear Energy Transfer (LET) of at least 40 MeV-cm2/mg.� The devices shall also exhibit a Total Ionizing Dose (TID) hardness of at least 100 krad (Si).� This task includes iterative modeling and simulation of heavy ion strikes in potential device topologies with adjustments to known factors impacting radiation tolerance.� The models should account for the electric fields and temperatures inside of the device under various bias conditions.� Once new devices are fabricated and tested by a separate organization, rate prediction models as a function of space radiation environments need to be developed.� The applicant should demonstrate strong, industry leading capabilities and expertise in the following areas: Technology Computer Aided Design (TCAD) device modeling and simulation of SiC diodes and MOSFETs and their response to ionizing radiation. Rate prediction models using Monte Carlo Radiative Energy Deposition (MRED) System level radiation hardness assurance for a range of risk tolerances depending on the risk posture of the system Knowledge of Schottky diode and power MOSFET design elements in high-power systems and how changes in device parameters from radiation-induced degradation affect the specific device applications ���� ����3. Responsibilities of partners ���� ����NASA/GSFC reserves the right to communicate with potential proposal partners for additional information about their interest and capability.�� NASA/GSFC reserves the option to not select any teaming partners under this offering on the basis of material received.��All information received in response to this notice that is marked 'Proprietary' will be handled and protected accordingly. ���� ���� ����4. Responding to the Sources Sought Synopsis ���� ����Potential partners may submit questions to Irene Bibyk via email at�Irene.Bibyk@nasa.gov.� �Pertinent information from questions and answers will be shared with all interested parties that respond with an interest to submit a proposal, without disclosing the identity of the sources of the questions. ���� ����Send proposal responses via email to Irene Bibyk (irene.bibyk@nasa.gov) by June 15, 2020.� ���� ����Written responses shall: ���� ����1. Not exceed 5 pages per proposal, plus up to 4 1-page resumes for individuals ����2. Use an Arial font text with a size not smaller than 12 point except for tables and chart graphics which can use 10 point ����3. Include all information requested in this notice ����4. Provide a Point of Contact and email to address questions from NASA ���� ����Response to this notice must: ���� ����1. Address capabilities the responder has to offer ����2. Identify particularly critical or challenging areas that have been overcome ����3. Indicate the resources (skill and time) that would be allocated to the technology development phase. ����4. Describe the work that is similar to the proposed area: to include grants and/or contracts, etc. ���� ���� ���� ����5. Selection Criteria for Awarding Partnership Opportunity ���� ����GSFC will evaluate the responses based on the following criteria: ���� ����Technical ���� ����1. Feasibility of the proposed technology development approach ����2. Effectiveness of the capabilities and qualifications to meet the proposed technology developments ����3. Effectiveness of the processes (including methods) and/or facilities to support the proposed technical areas ����4. Relevance and effectiveness of experience and past similar performance to meet the proposed technology development areas ���� ���� ����Innovative Approaches and Partnering ���� ����1. Innovativeness of the technology development concepts as applied to the designated GSFC technology areas identified in Section 2 ����2. Likelihood to meaningfully advance the technology leading to its eventual utilization ����3. Ability to work as a part of a government-industry team that may include other industrial partners, academia and/or other government agencies ����4. Innovativeness of the�management and/or technical partnering approaches that could be used to optimize resources and technical development, including a description on how the approach will help successfully execute the technology development work plan ���� ���� ����Cost ���� ����1. Reasonableness of cost and schedule cost estimates
- Web Link
-
SAM.gov Permalink
(https://beta.sam.gov/opp/ba66d1420df94827bc4280aba943d00f/view)
- Record
- SN05676493-F 20200603/200601230149 (samdaily.us)
- Source
-
SAM.gov Link to This Notice
(may not be valid after Archive Date)
| FSG Index | This Issue's Index | Today's SAM Daily Index Page |