FBODaily.com | FedBizOpps: MOD | R | Advise, Teach, and Mentor the Afghanistan National Security Forces (ANSF) and Afghanistan Security Institutions (ASI)

FBO DAILY - FEDBIZOPPS ISSUE OF DECEMBER 02, 2015 FBO #5122
MODIFICATION

R -- Advise, Teach, and Mentor the Afghanistan National Security Forces (ANSF) and Afghanistan Security Institutions (ASI)

Notice Date: 11/30/2015
Notice Type: Modification/Amendment
NAICS: 611430 — Professional and Management Development Training
Contracting Office: Department of the Army, Army Contracting Command, Army Contracting Command - Rock Island (ACC-RI), 3055 Rodman Avenue, Rock Island, Illinois, 61299-8000, United States
ZIP Code: 61299-8000
Solicitation Number: W560MY-16-R-0001
Point of Contact: BRENT M DEPAUW, Phone: 3097828031
E-Mail Address: brent.m.depauw.civ@mail.mil
(brent.m.depauw.civ@mail.mil)
Small Business Set-Aside: N/A
Description: Below is a list of all questions submitted in response to the W560MUY-16-R-0001 synopsis posting and draft pws: QUESTION 1: Has a contractor performed similar work to this for the government in the past? If available, please provide the incumbent contract number. ANSWER: DynCorp International LLC is currently performing similar services under contracts W560MY-15-C-0005 and W560MY-15-C-0006. QUESTION 2: It appears that the requirements contained in this PWS are very similar to those of the PWS for the Government of the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan (GIRoA) Advisors for the Ministry of Defense (MoD) and Ministry of Interior (MoI) Dated: 17 Jul 2014 and the PWS for the Functional Area Support Teams (FAST) Dated 24 Oct 2015. All three requirements call for provision of expert advisors and assistants to build organizational capacity and capability across various functional areas of the MoI, and or MoD. The first call out five functional areas needing focused attention and the later three. This instant requirement calls for eight functional areas in need of capacity building. Will there be measures in place to mitigate duplication of efforts? Is this last effort designed to bundle and combine the other two, thus eliminating those contracts in the coming years? ANSWER: This effort is not a duplication and the Government has methods in place to not duplicate efforts. QUESTION 3: This solicitation is listed as Set aside - N/A- Will this effort remain unrestricted or does the government intend to change the competition level to Small Business set aside via future amendments? ANSWER: There are currently no set asides for this requirement. QUESTION 4: EF-6 - states, "Plan, resource and execute effective security campaigns and operations: inter-ministerial and joint coordination; and command, control and employ ground, air and special operating forces." If the effort in unrestricted would any small business firms proposing for this effort be virtually eliminated by the magnitude of this task? ANSWER: There are currently no set asides for this requirement. QUESTION 5: Paragraph 1.16.12 states, "(ODCs exclude the following items (list not all inclusive) - subcontractor labor, security clearances, employee training, any program management cost, pre-employment drug screening, any class 1 (food/water), individual comfort items, fringe cost (H&W, Worker's Comp, Etc) and or passenger cars)".Are these costs to be included within proposed CLIN values as appropriate? Would any require itemization through the invoicing process? ANSWER: ODC's will be set up as a cost reimbursable CLIN with no fee. If any of the listed excluded items are valid, they should be included within the proposed CLIN values as appropriate. QUESTION 6: Part 5, Paragraph 5.3.2 Advisor, Payroll (US Advisors), Subparagraph 5.3.2.1. Duties, state, "The contractor shall advise and mentor ANDSF and ASI officials on the following topics: - Fully pay all their employees accurately, timely and in a secure fashion. - Implement electronic pay system (EPS) within MoD and MoI. - Increase Electronic Funds Transfer (EFT) to include entire workforce. - Manage payroll budget and execution through AHRIMS and according to Tashkil and Pay scales. Will the potential contractor be tasked to create and design databases and web-based capabilities to interface systems such as AHRIMS and EPS? ANSWER: The contractor will not be tasked to create and design databases or web-based capabilities to interface with any system. The contractor will only be involved with the actual business process flow design that will be given to the Netlinks contractor for actual system and database design. AHRIMS will be replaced by the Afghanistan Personnel and Payroll System (APPS). QUESTION 7: The PWS describes the AHRIMS to have many "software errors". Furthermore, the PWS states that " [t]he implementation of AHRIMS would cause the practice of ghost soldiers to be curtailed - at least partially..." This leads us to believe that the contractor will be responsible for the further implementation of AHRIMS. For this effort, is it expected that the contractor provide software development / database development services in terms of the AHRIMS? Does the contractor need to have in-depth knowledge of the current AHRIMS architecture? If so, does the Government intend to release any technical documents for the AHRIMS? ANSWER: The contractor will not be responsible for further implementation of AHRIMS but will be responsible for providing reporting requirements to Afghan counterparts needed from AHRIMS/APPS systems and instructions on how to pull reports to find necessary data within the system to answer questions such as "Who is eligible for re-contracting?" etc. They will not be performing software development. QUESTION 8: Does the Government intend to include FFP quotes from contractors for the Safe House CLIN in the RFP? ANSWER: Yes, a FFP CLIN will be established, and prices will be proposed for Safe Houses to house individuals by range (ie 0-25 individuals, 26-50 individuals) on a monthly basis. QUESTION 9: Will the Safe House quotes be part of the total evaluated price for the LPTA determination? ANSWER: Yes. QUESTION 10: Will the contractor have a role in providing security for contractor personnel individuals that are working at sites throughout the country? Is the contractor required to provide its own security at the Safe House and for travel from the safe house to the work location? Is so, it is expected that a PSC1 certification will be required to support this contract. ANSWER: Normally the Government will provide security for advisors as they travel with Government personnel from government offices to sites. The Contractor is required to provide its own security at Safe House(s) and for travel between Safe House(s) and work location. QUESTION 11: Does Technical Exhibit 6 show the current staffing on the contract or a projected staffing level for the first year of the new contract? Please clarify. Will the Government provide the current staffing level of the contract by labor category and the projected staffing level by labor category for each of the next 5 years? ANSWER: Technical Exhibit 6 shows the estimated staffing levels at time of award. Actual staffing will be ordered on an IDIQ basis. QUESTION 12: Does the Government have an established lead time for notifying the contractor of a surge requirement or a downsizing requirement? Are contractor response times negotiated on an action-by-action basis or is there an expectation that the contractor will have a bench of personnel and will be able to staff up to a surge level that will be established by the RFP? ANSWER: The Government does not expect the contractor to have a bench of personnel. Expected lead time is 45 days and will be written into the PWS. QUESTION 13: Draft PWS paragraph 3.1.3 states: "It is anticipated that all Contractor employees will be housed aboard coalition or U.S. installations. If such billeting is not available, then the USG will provide appropriate reimbursement for safe houses for contractors working this contract." If contractors may be required to provide their own life support services, this will not only involve costs associated with safe houses, but other supporting functions as well, including movement security and transportation (which in turn will depend on requirements the Government imposes on the location of the safe houses, proximity to work locations, etc.). Given the uncertain availability of Government-provided billeting, can the Government confirm that offerors will be required to submit with their proposals comprehensive life support solutions including safe houses and other supporting functions? And if so, can the Government more clearly delineate which life support functions specifically offerors may be required to provide under this contract (and hence will be required to price in their proposals)? ANSWER: If Government billeting and life support services are unavailable, the contractor will be expected to provide, and this cost will be part of the buildup of the safehouses. QUESTION 14: Draft PWS paragraph 1.3 states: "The objective for this effort is for the contractor to advise, mentor, train, and provide expertise to ANDSF and ASI personnel in order to improve and sustain specific governmental processes and systems across the eight (8) Essential Functions (EF) using and indefinite delivery / indefinite quantity (IDIQ) contract." Can the Government confirm that its intent is to issue a single-award IDIQ contract in response to this procurement? ANSWER: Yes the intent is to issue a single award IDIQ contract. QUESTION 15: "The Contract Line Item Numbers (CLIN) for personnel will be cost reimbursable based upon a fully-burdened firm fixed unit price per person, per day." Can the Government please verify that its intention is to require the contractor to bill the required number of units on a fixed unit price basis? If so, what is the Government's planned methodology for verifying the quantity of units for billing purposes? ANSWER: The intent is for the contractor to propose a fully burdened daily rate for each labor category. The contractor will then invoice for each day the employee is "boots on ground" working the requirement. The contractor will not be allowed to invoice for an individual during hiring, mobilization, demobilization, and R&R as they won't be considered "boots on ground" working the requirement. The contractor shall invoice monthly, and the quantity will be verified by each requirement owner (example the employee reported for duty December 11 and worked the remaining days, thus invoicing for 21 days (Dec 11 - Dec 31). QUESTION 16: Draft PWS paragraph 1.6.1.1 states "In the event the Contractor's personnel performance is unsatisfactory, the Government reserves the right to request and receive satisfactory replacement. The Contractor shall be responsible for identifying a suitable replacement within 15 days of notification. A replacement shall be in theater, performing services at the specified place of performance no later than 35 days after a position becomes vacant." However, meeting the final Secret clearance requirements, completing CRC, and traveling into theatre will be incredibly difficult to achieve within 35 days. Will the Government accordingly consider extending this requirement from 35 to 60 days? In addition, can the Government confirm that this replacement requirement is only applicable in cases in which the removal of personnel would lower the offeror's staffing levels to below the 85% staffing requirement stated in Draft PWS paragraph 1.6.3.1? ANSWER: The Government will consider increasing the number of days from 35 to 60, however the intent is to always be staffed at 100%, as the contractor can only invoice the number of labor positions they provide and are "boots on ground". The 85% minimum staffing level is to protect the Government, and if staffing levels drop below 85%, the Government would consider asking the contractor for consideration. QUESTION 17: Draft PWS paragraph 3.1.1.15 states: "Pre-deployment training and processing at the designated CONUS Replacement Center (CRC). Currently the designated CRC is located at Fort Bliss, TX." If an offeror has a DoD-approved CRC, can it use its CRC in lieu of using the Ft. Bliss CRC? ANSWER: Yes QUESTION 18: Draft PWS Paragraph 1.6.12 contains a list of possible ODCs and associated categories, but it appears to be incomplete. Can the Government provide a more comprehensive list of ODCs offerors will be required to purchase under this contract? Will the Contractor be expected to propose against the list of ODCs? ANSWER: Since ODC's are unknown, and can vary depending on future requirements, for evaluation purposes ODC's will be calculated using the same flat amount filled in for each offeror. QUESTION 19: Will there be property management requirements, such as an approved property management system? ANSWER: Yes QUESTION 20: Will there be any subcontract consent requirements? ANSWER: No. QUESTION 21: How many billets for offeror PMO personnel is the Government planning on allocating for this contract? ANSWER: Currently the only PMO requirement which will be invoiced separately are the three Key positions (Program Manager, Security Manager, and OCONUS Site Lead) all other PMO positions shall be fully burdened with each labor rate to meet the requirement of the PWS. QUESTION 22: Will the USG please clarify if award on this contract will create an OCI with performance on other ANDSF contracts, namely W56HZV-15-R-0139 [i.e., NMS-A]? ANSWER: An OCI mitigation plan will be one of the requirements for submission by each offeror. QUESTION 23: During pre-deployment mobilization contractors are not considered to be "on the contract." TE 1, PRS#1 mandates an 85% fill rate on all positions. Is this fill rate "boots on the ground?" Please confirm that personnel processing CRC for mobilization and those on R&R leave would not count towards the fill rate. ANSWER: Correct contract employees are not considered to be on contract till "boots on ground". QUESTION 24: Does the government anticipate a left-seat/right-seat handover from incumbent contract to awardee should the incumbent be unseated by the award or does this paragraph reflect that the government envisions a train-up period conducted by the government? ANSWER: The Government anticipates a left-seat/right-seat handover from the incumbent contractor along with training from the Government. QUESTION 25: Para 1.6.9.3, Personnel - This paragraph requires contractors to comply with "the standards of conduct." Does this refer to paragraph 1.7 "Personnel Conduct". ANSWER: Yes QUESTION 26: How does the government intend for offerors to capture the costs for administration and testing relating to establishment and enforcement of "an aggressive substance abuse screening program at all sites" (random periodic and 100% bi-yearly testing)? ANSWER: All labor rates should be fully burdened with applicable cost. QUESTION 27: For which positions on the program will the government require resumes and/or letters of commitment in offerors proposals? ANSWER: Key Personnel QUESTION 28: Regarding the potential lack of availability of housing on coalition or U.S. installations that would trigger the contractor to secure a safe house for their employees working on this contract, what is meant by "appropriate reimbursement?" ANSWER: The current plan is for each offeror to submit pricing on a monthly basis for safehouse's for a category of individuals (example 1-25 individuals, 26-50 individuals, 51-75 individuals, etc). If coalition housing is unavailable, the US Government will request the contractor to provide safehousing IAW set standard for the required # of personnel, and the contractor will invoice accordingly monthly. QUESTION 29: If commercial air between the "theater gateway" (Kuwait?) is used due to immigration issues (entry stamps in passports) created by entering/departing Afghanistan at military airfields, will the government allow mail shipment of government furnished equipment issued to individuals at CRC? If so, how will contractor bill for this? Would the government consider allowing for shipment of individual gear issued at CRC to be a reimbursable expense? ANSWER: See Question 29. Most equipment is already available in theater. If this is an issue, the Government would consider this to be and ODC reimbursable cost that would have to be pre-approved. QUESTION 30: Are there currently enough weapons, body armor and ammunition currently assigned to incumbent contractor personnel to equip the contractor staff for the follow on award? If so, will the COR facilitate a handover of this equipment and will it become GFP? If not, how will contractors get this equipment into theater? Will a storage facility that the contract is to secure and manage be provided by the government in theater? Since body armor can be issued at CRC and shipped along with other CRC issued equipment via USPS, would the government consider making this a reimbursable expense? ANSWER: Yes there are currently enough weapons, body armor and ammunition assigned to incumbent to equip the new contractor staff for the follow on award. Yes the COR will facilitate the handover of this equipment and it will become GFP. QUESTION 31: Para 5.6.3.3, Essential Qualifications - The final bullet of this paragraph states that the CSTC-A CDD Force Management Advisors "must deploy with a weapon (US or NATO pistol, rifle, or both)." This contradicts para 3.2.2 which states that it is currently "not legally possible for contractors to deploy into theater and immigrate into Afghanistan carrying their body armor, weapons, and ammunition." Is Para 5.6.3.3 incorrect? Will these advisers need to link up with their weapons in theater as is the case with other armed contractors on this contract? ANSWER: Para 5.6.3.3 is incorrect and will be revised. Also See answer to question 29. QUESTION 32: Para 5.6.2.3, Essential Qualifications - This paragraph ends with the statement, "the contractor shall provide advisors working in this section with the following additional essential qualifications...". However, no additional qualifications are listed. Were additional qualifications unintentionally omitted? ANSWER: 5.6.2.3 reads as follows: 5.6.2.3. Essential Qualifications. In addition to the basic qualifications listed in paragraph 5.2, the contractor shall provide advisors working in this section with the following additional essential qualifications: - Former military officer (O-5+) or NCO (E-8+) with division or higher staff experience. - Six or more years HR experience with exposure to HR database management. - Prior supervisory experience required. - Demonstrated organizational and analytical skills. - Ability to effectively communicate, advise, and train others in principles of the associated staff functions. - Driver's qualification, including the ability to operate manual transmission vehicles. - Must be armed to perform this work and meet all requirements for arming. QUESTION 33: The requirements as outlined in each of the labor categories for advisors/mentors only specify that four positions must be armed. These are in EF 4 (HR Advisor, AHRIMS Advisor, CSTC-A CDD Force Management Advisor) and EF 8 (ANDSF Travel Planner). Can all positions be armed? Is this left up to the contractor's discretion? Will an example of a complete arming package (the paperwork necessary to be submitted for arming authorization) and process for arming authorizations be provided to the contractor? ANSWER: The contractor may arm all personnel. However, Arming will be in accordance with "USFOR-A FRAGO 15-032 ARMING PROCEDURES FOR DOD CONTRACTORS" The government will provide examples. QUESTION 34: The skill levels for the "Lead" and "Head" translators are identical as are those of the "Translators." Was it the government's intent for the skill levels of the Lead and Head translators to be identical? ANSWER: The skill levels for "Lead" and "Head" translators are the same (Level 1). However, the skill levels of the Lead/Head translators are higher than translators (Level 2). The Government will update paragraph 5.6.7 and 5.6.21 titles so they match. QUESTION 35: Would the government verify that duty descriptions, skill levels and the number of FTEs will match data in Technical Exhibit 6? ANSWER: Technical Exhibit 6 shows the estimated staffing levels at time of award. Actual staffing will be ordered on an IDIQ basis. QUESTION 36: The clearance requirements specified in the basic requirements for the Senior Advisor and Advisor are final Secret clearances finalized prior to departure from the U.S. However in the three of the EF 4 positions (Training Advisor, Logistics Training Advisor, and ICT Training Advisor) the requirements only require an interim Secret clearance which can be finalized once the contractor is in theater. Additionally, the EF 8 position, Security Assistance Sr. Advisor requires that the individual be eligible for TS/SCI clearance. However, the DD 254 for this contract only authorizes Secret clearances to be held. Would the government consider upgrading the DD 254 to allow offerors to hold TS/SCI clearances/access? Can you also clarify whether an interim Secret clearance is acceptable for the other three positions? ANSWER: EF 4 positions require final secret clearances and PWS will be updated to reflect that. The Government will leave the DD 254 as is at the Secret Level. QUESTION 37: Will the government consider providing passport control on the coalition base in order to mitigate the lack of entry stamps on current contractors who arrive via MilAir? ANSWER: If immigration processing is available at time of contract award, the government will consider providing passport control. QUESTION 38: Current contractors are working on RS and HKIA, which requires RS badges. Will the government confirm that all these positions are CE Billets at RS? ANSWER: RS badges are available to contractors with security clearances. Contractor personnel are coded as Contractor Billets. QUESTION 39: Section 3.1.13 states that contractors will receive, when necessary, resuscitative care. Will USG provide routine or emergency Medical Care? Will the USG provide Medical Evacuation when needed? ANSWER: The Government will only provide emergency medical care. The Government will provide medical evacuation when needed. QUESTION 40: In technical exhibit 6, please define the requirements for "Nonspecific" positions. ANSWER: These positions are ones that technically do no fall under any specific EF or may span multiple EFs. These positions include: 5.10.1, 5.10.2.1, 5.10.2.2, 5.10.2.3 and 5.10.2.4 QUESTION 41: Para 5.3.6.3, Essential Qualifications - Will the Government specify what language is required in this section? Will the government clarify what is meant by Level 6 proficiency? ANSWER: Dari. It should read Level 1 (requirements specified in paragraph 5.6.7), not level 6. PWS will be updated. QUESTION 42: Regarding Safe Houses: Section 1.1 holds contractor responsible for all personnel, equipment, supplies, facilities, transportation, tool and materials. Section 1.6.5 discusses Safe House Costs. Request government estimate provide the number of safe houses that may be required. Would the government also clarify who is responsible for safety, acquisition of the facility, life support services, and transportation for those who are required to stay in safe houses? ANSWER: The contractor is responsible for acquiring safe houses and maintaining all safety, transportation, life support and security requirements. The Government cannot estimate the number of safe houses as it depends on the capacity of the contractor selected safe houses. QUESTION 43: Will employees who are "rebadging" from the outgoing contractor to the incoming contractor be required to attend CRC again? ANSWER: No. QUESTION 44: Must all personnel hired be approved by the USG? ANSWER: No, only "Key Positions" - all others must meet minimum qualifications for their position. QUESTION 45: If no facilities exist for Government provided food and essentials, is there a mechanism for reimbursement/per diem? ANSWER: Government provided meals are provided at most locations. See question 12. Also see PWS paragraph 1.6.12. QUESTION 46: As the scope of work of increased, can the Government confirm it has merged requirements from more than one contract and if so can the contract number and incumbent(s) information be provided? Also is the end customer the same for these requirements or is this now a multi-agency opportunity? ANSWER: You may be confusing this requirement with other requirements for similar services. The scope of this requirement has not changes and the current contractor and contracts is listed in question #1. QUESTION 47: DPWS 1.3 references an IDIQ type contract. Will there be a single winner or multiple winners and what type of contract will the task orders be? 1.6.5 mentions a hybrid type contract but is unclear as to whether or not this will apply to all task orders. ANSWER: The intent is to issue a single award IDIQ type contract with a hybrid of CLINs consisting of Firm Fixed Unit Price (FFUP), and Cost Reimbursable with no fee. QUESTION 48: Technical Exhibit 3 denotes hours by position type but does not address what the work week will entail- Sunday to Thursday? Also, the reference under 1.6.3.2 talks about "recognized" holidays. Can a list of these holidays for both US and Afghan personnel be provided? ANSWER: The work week may differ between PWS sections and positions to ensure coverage. However, generally the work week consists of one day per week off. The Afghan holidays vary from year to year. QUESTION 49: What are the nationality requirements (if any) for the 96 IT type positions? ANSWER: See PWS paragraphs 5.6.7 and 5.6.8. QUESTION 50: The number of ex-patriate personnel has increased considerably under the DPWS. Can the Government explain the reasoning behind the increase of ex-pat personnel and provide the rationale for why these positions are not able to be filled by local national staff? ANSWER: This is the first release of the PWS, thus the requirement hasn't increased or decreased. The Government is under the assumption you have been comparing this to another requirement. QUESTION 51: Previous Q&A indicated that this requirement would not be an OCI with performance on other ANDSF contracts but given the increase and change of scope can the Government confirm this is still the case? ANSWER: This is the first Q&A concerning this requirement, however an OCI plan will be required by all bidders. QUESTION 52: Can Technical Exhibit 5/Attachment 8 be provided as 1.6.6.4 requires physical security to the detail provided is insufficient in determining what physical security will be necessary? ANSWER: Technical Exhibit 5 (Government Furnished Property) will be released with the solicitation. QUESTION 53: Does the response to the previous addressed question 24 still apply? ANSWER: Again this is the first Q&A regarding this requirement. QUESTION 54: Can the Government confirm whether AHRIMS is currently being used or not? The PWS talks about previous implementation but also discusses a requirement for implementation. Also, does the system require overhaul or evaluation? ANSWER: AHRIMS is currently in use. There is a separate initiative/contract to merge AHRIMS, EPS and enhance some capabilities. Any system changes will be accomplished by other contracts already in place and not by these contractor personnel. QUESTION 55: Is there a system currently being used for the PPBE process and if so can more information be provided? ANSWER: In fiscal year 2015 the Ministry of Defense (MoD) produced a budget based on a prioritized 1 to N list of all program requirements for the entire Afghan National Defense Security Force (ANDSF) constrained to a top line provided by the coalition for the first time ever. This historic achievement was made possible through the development and enforcement of financial processes by the Combined Security Transition Command-Afghanistan (CSTC-A), CJ8, Program and Analysis (PandA) team. These processes along with the MOD budget produced will ensure the Planning, Programming, Budget, and Execution (PPBE) process will endure. PandA successfully Trained, Advised and Assisted (TAA) the MoD Program and Analysis team execute 8 integrated Joint Coordination Councils and one General Officer Steering Committee (GOSC), that brought international donors, coalition, MoD and Afghan representatives together for the first time to review the combined draft $4.1B MoD budget and provide the ministries with their first look at "off" budget funded requirements. Further, over the course of summer 2015, PandA mentored the MoD Program, Analysis and Evaluation Division in their creation of a 99 percent correct Final Programming Position for the Ministry's Budget Circular-2 submission and 12 MoD budgetary units/budget builders to collaborate and develop an internally generated 1-N prioritized list of the Ministry budget's requirements. PandA also lobbied and secured successful buy-in from MoD and Coalition General Officers to accomplish the first ever integrated Senior Leader Steering Committee in support of the Afghan SY1395 budget build resulting in consensus from all parties on the MoD Final Programming Positions. This body of work ultimately resulted in the Afghan Budget Circular-2 submission to the Ministry of Finance and will serve as the basis for the coalition commitment to ANDSF (Commitment Letter) and will serve as the basis of the POM17-21 build. PandA also served as the as a primary contributor and driving force for the Center for Naval Analyses' portion of the ANDSF Plan of Record (APoR) by providing cost data support for their independent analysis of the ANDSF; PandA further drafted key sections of the USFOR-A response to the Joint Staff in support of this effort. Finally, PandA initiated a major overhaul of the CJ8 Requirements Database containing over $35B of ANDSF requirements by rewriting code and updating standard operating procedures to add anti-tamper safeguards thereby significantly reducing the potential for internal and external user errors. Systems: RDD Database - Microsoft Access 2013 1 to N List - Microsoft Excel 2013 QUESTION 56: Section 1.7.2 outlines employees/personal weapons information. Is it a requirement for personnel to carry weapons and if so does this apply to all positions? ANSWER: Personnel are required to carry weapons who occupy PWS positions that have this requirement. Also see question 31.
Web Link: FBO.gov Permalink
(https://www.fbo.gov/notices/9a64c563757d73f6833f1acac0169186)
Place of Performance: Address: rock island, Illinois, 61299, United States; Zip Code: 61299
Record: SN03956654-W 20151202/151130234308-9a64c563757d73f6833f1acac0169186 (fbodaily.com)
Source: FedBizOpps Link to This Notice
(may not be valid after Archive Date)

| FSG Index | This Issue's Index | Today's FBO Daily Index Page |

Loren Data's SAM Daily™

R -- Advise, Teach, and Mentor the Afghanistan National Security Forces (ANSF) and Afghanistan Security Institutions (ASI)