MODIFICATION
62 -- Expeditionary Airfields (EAF) Sustainment Lighting System (SLS)
- Notice Date
- 9/5/2013
- Notice Type
- Modification/Amendment
- NAICS
- 335129
— Other Lighting Equipment Manufacturing
- Contracting Office
- Department of the Navy, Naval Air Systems Command, Naval Air Warfare Center Aircraft Division Lakehurst, Contracts Department, Hwy. 547 Attn:B562-3C, Lakehurst, New Jersey, 08733-5083
- ZIP Code
- 08733-5083
- Solicitation Number
- N68335-13-R-0028
- Archive Date
- 6/4/2013
- Point of Contact
- Shanna Cermak, Phone: 7323231576, Michelle Prinston, Phone: 732-323-1192
- E-Mail Address
-
shanna.cermak@navy.mil, michelle.prinston@navy.mil
(shanna.cermak@navy.mil, michelle.prinston@navy.mil)
- Small Business Set-Aside
- N/A
- Description
- 9/5/2013- UPDATE: This posting provides clarification to the following questions. An amendment will not be issued. Responses are due 09 September 2013, 12:00 pm (Eastern). RFP Section J, Attach 1 (System Specification), Paragraph 3.2.1.4.2.1(f), 3.2.1.4.2.2(f), and 3.2.1.4.2.3.3(c), Pages 30, 31, 35. Question: Paragraph's 3.2.1.4.2.1(f), 3.2.1.4.2.2(f), and 3.2.1.4.2.3.3(c) of the SLS specification give the intensity requirements for the flashing REIL, ODAL and MALSR in terms of the "minimum average intensity". The draft version SLS specification gave these intensity requirements as "maximum effective intensity". The FAA typically gives both a minimum and maximum effective intensity. Was the change from "effective intensity" to "intensity" inadvertent or is the specified requirement meant to be for the "intensity" of the light while it the LEDs are on (i.e. the instantaneous intensity)? Response: The stated requirements are correct as listed in the performance specification. The REIL, ODALS and MALSR Sequenced Flasher fixtures shall consist of a light source having the minimum average intensities (steady state) as stated in paragraphs 3.2.1.4.2.1(f), 3.2.1.4.2.2(f) and 3.2.1.4.3.3(c) of the specification. These light sources shall be capable of being flashed with the periodicities and duty cycles as stated in the subsequent paragraphs of each components' description. RFP Section J, Attach 1 (System Specification), Paragraph 3.2.1.4.2.1(f), 3.2.1.4.2.2(f), and 3.2.1.4.2.3.3(c), Pages 30, 31, 35. Question: Referencing the question above, the SLS also deviates from the FAA in not providing the minimum and maximum range (the tolerance of the REIL and ODAL is + or - 50% in AC 150/5345-51B). Please confirm whether this is what was intended or if the intent was for the visible photometric output to mirror the FAA. Response: The stated requirement is correct, and is not intended to be an exact mirror of FAA AC 150/5345-51B values. RFP Section J, Attach 1 (System Specification), Paragraph 3.2.1.4.2.3.2(c), Page 34 Question: Paragraph 3.2.1.4.2.3.2(c) of the SLS specification deviates from the FAA photometric requirements (minimum average intensity of 8,000 cd from -14 to +14 degrees in the SLS vs minimum average intensity of 8,000 cd from -10 to +10 degrees in FAA-E-2980). Please confirm whether this is what was intended or if the intent was for the visible photometric output to mirror the FAA. Response: The stated requirement is correct, and is not intended to be an exact mirror of FAA-E-2980 values.
- Web Link
-
FBO.gov Permalink
(https://www.fbo.gov/spg/DON/NAVAIR/N68335/N68335-13-R-0028/listing.html)
- Record
- SN03175638-W 20130907/130905235546-05a841c722a1e1c9d32d8cc9a82cdaf9 (fbodaily.com)
- Source
-
FedBizOpps Link to This Notice
(may not be valid after Archive Date)
| FSG Index | This Issue's Index | Today's FBO Daily Index Page |