Loren Data's SAM Daily™

fbodaily.com
Home Today's SAM Search Archives Numbered Notes CBD Archives Subscribe
FBO DAILY ISSUE OF DECEMBER 23, 2012 FBO #4047
SOURCES SOUGHT

Y -- Request for comments on the potential use of Project Labor Agreements (PLA) for Hurricane Protection System, West Bank, Non-Federal Levee, NOV-NF-W-04a, Oakville to La Reussite, Plaquemines Parish, Louisiana.

Notice Date
12/21/2012
 
Notice Type
Sources Sought
 
NAICS
237990 — Other Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction
 
Contracting Office
USACE District, New Orleans, ATTN: CEMVN-CT, P.O. Box 60267, New Orleans, LA 70160-0267
 
ZIP Code
70160-0267
 
Solicitation Number
W912P8-13-B-0028
 
Response Due
12/28/2012
 
Archive Date
2/19/2013
 
Point of Contact
Jason M. Carlock, 601-631-5793
 
E-Mail Address
USACE District, New Orleans
(jason.m.carlock@usace.army.mil)
 
Small Business Set-Aside
N/A
 
Description
The Vicksburg District Corps of Engineers, on behalf of the New Orleans District Corps of Engineers, is soliciting comments from the construction community addressing the potential use of Project Labor Agreements (PLA) from large scale construction projects (exceeding $25 million) within the New Orleans District for the following project: Hurricane Protection System, West Bank, Non-Federal Levee, NOV-NF-W-04a, Oakville to La Reussite, Plaquemines Parish, Louisiana. Project Description: The work consists of installing temporary access roads and traffic control, installing steel sheet piling, steel H-piling, constructing concrete T-wall, placement of compacted fill embankment, concrete slope pavement, and extending eight (8) existing seventy two (72) inch diameter discharge pipes. Range of Magnitude: $25 to $100 Million. Period of Performance: 912 calendar days after Notice to Proceed. Some of the factors that may be considered regarding their use are: a. The involvement of multiple contractors and/or subcontractors working in multiple crafts or trades. b. The complexity of the project. c. Shortage of skilled labor in the region. d. Completion of the project will require an extended period of time. e. The use of PLA's on other comparable projects. f. The promotion of the Governments long term programs interests such as training of skilled workforce for future projects. g. The possibility of labor disputes that threaten timely completion. h. Additional costs from use of PLAs may be cost prohibitive. A PLA is defined as a pre-hire collective bargaining agreement with one or more labor organizations that establishes the terms and conditions of employment for a specific construction project and is an agreement described in 29 U.S.C. 158(f). Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Policy: a. Project Labor Agreement (PLA) is a tool that agencies may use to promote economy and efficiency in Federal procurement. Pursuant to Executive Order 13502, agencies are encouraged to consider requiring the use of project labor agreements in connection with large-scale construction projects. b. An agency may, if appropriate, require that every contractor and subcontractor engaged in construction on the project agree, for that project, to negotiate or become a party to a project labor agreement with one or more labor organizations if the agency decides that the use of project labor agreements will: 1. Advance the Federal Governments interest in achieving economy and efficiency in Federal procurement, producing labor-management stability, and ensuring compliance with laws and regulations governing safety and health, equal employment opportunity, labor and employment standards, and other matters; and 2. Be consistent with law. Reference: Provision: 52.222-33 Notice of Requirement for Project Labor Agreement Clause 52.222-34 Project Labor Agreement. In consideration of the above factors, and any others which may be deemed appropriate, the construction community is invited to comment on the use of PLAs. Of particular interest to the Government are responses to the following questions: a. Should PLAs be executed on selected large dollar contracts within the above referenced location by the New Orleans District? What other factors should the Corps consider before deciding to include PLA provisions in a New Orleans District contract? What type of project should or should not be considered for PLA? b. Is the use of PLAs effective in achieving economy and efficiency in Federal procurement? What is the estimated relative cost impact, or any other economies or efficiencies derived by the Federal Government, if using PLAs? Will a PLA impact the cost of submitting an offer? c. Is the use of PLAs effective in producing labor-management stability? Have labor disputes or other labor issues contributed to project delays in the local area? d. Is the use of PLAs conducive to ensuring compliance with laws and regulations governing safety and health, equal employment opportunity, labor and employment standards, and other relevant matters? Are there instances where these standards have not been met on Federal contracts in the local area? Were PLAs used for those specific contracts? e. Projects will require multiple construction contractors and/or subcontractors employing workers in multiple crafts or trades. Do you foresee any work on projects that may result in both the prime contractor and at least one subcontractor, or two or more subcontractors, employing the same trade? f. Are there concerns by prime contractors on the availability of skilled construction labor? Information may reference current apprenticeship statistics and workforce age demographics. g. Completion of anticipated projects will require an extensive performance periods. Will a PLA impact the completion time? What is the anticipated volatility in the labor market for the trades required for the execution of the project? Would a PLA benefit a project which contains a unique and compelling mission-critical schedule? h. Where have PLAs been used on comparable projects undertaken by Federal, State, municipal, or private entities in the geographic area of this project? i. Will the use of PLAs impact the ability of potential Offerors and subcontractors to meet small-business utilization goals? Please provide your comments via e-mail to Jason M. Carlock, Contract Specialist at Jason.M.Carlock@usace.army.mil no later than close of business on 28 December 2012. Agency/Contracting Office: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Vicksburg District ATTN: CEMVN-CT-C 4155 Clay Street Vicksburg, MS 39183-3435 Place of Performance: New Orleans, Louisiana Point of Contact: Jason M. Carlock U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Vicksburg District CEMVN-CT-C Jason.M.Carlock@usace.army.mil Contracting Office Address: USACE Vicksburg District CEMVK-CT-C 4155 Clay Street Vicksburg, MS 39183-3435
 
Web Link
FBO.gov Permalink
(https://www.fbo.gov/spg/USA/COE/DACA29/W912P8-13-B-0028/listing.html)
 
Place of Performance
Address: USACE District, New Orleans ATTN: CEMVN-CT, P.O. Box 60267 New Orleans LA
Zip Code: 70160-0267
 
Record
SN02954863-W 20121223/121221235108-2050aa83c3cf6cc26294429aa45e4847 (fbodaily.com)
 
Source
FedBizOpps Link to This Notice
(may not be valid after Archive Date)

FSG Index  |  This Issue's Index  |  Today's FBO Daily Index Page |
ECGrid: EDI VAN Interconnect ECGridOS: EDI Web Services Interconnect API Government Data Publications CBDDisk Subscribers
 Privacy Policy  Jenny in Wanderland!  © 1994-2024, Loren Data Corp.