SOLICITATION NOTICE
Z -- Install Advanced Eletrical Meters - RFQ FA5270-12-T-0055
- Notice Date
- 6/1/2012
- Notice Type
- Combined Synopsis/Solicitation
- NAICS
- 238210
— Electrical Contractors and Other Wiring Installation Contractors
- Contracting Office
- Department of the Air Force, Pacific Air Forces, 18 CONS - Kadena, Unit 5199, Kadena AB, APO Japan, 96368-5199
- ZIP Code
- 96368-5199
- Solicitation Number
- FA5270-12-T-0055
- Point of Contact
- A1C Brian A. Austin, Phone: 3156344741, Ken Kuresaki, Phone: 312-634-5958
- E-Mail Address
-
brian.austin.8@us.af.mil, ken.kuresaki.jp@kadena.af.mil
(brian.austin.8@us.af.mil, ken.kuresaki.jp@kadena.af.mil)
- Small Business Set-Aside
- N/A
- Description
- Solicitation FA5270-12-T-0055 CONST-L-7300 PROPOSAL PREPARATION INSTRUCTIONS (JUN 2006) A. To assure timely and equitable evaluation of proposals, offerors must follow the instructions contained herein. Offerors are required to meet all solicitation requirements, including terms and conditions, representations and certifications, and technical requirements. Failure to meet a requirement may result in an offer being ineligible for award. The response shall consist of two (2) separately bound parts, Part I - Price Proposal, and Part II - Past Performance Information. B. The contracting officer has determined there is a high probability of adequate price competition in this acquisition. Upon examination of the initial offers, the contracting officer will review this determination and if, in the contracting officer's opinion, adequate price competition exists, no additional cost information will be requested and certification under FAR 15.406-2 will not be required. However, if at any time during this competition the contracting officer determines that adequate price competition no longer exists, offerors may be required to submit information to the extent necessary for the contracting officer to determine the reasonableness and affordability of the price. C. Specific Instructions: 1. PART II - PAST PERFORMANCE INFORMATION - Limited to no more than TWO pages per contract listed. Submit original plus three (3) copies. (a) Quality and Satisfaction Rating for Contracts Completed in the Past Five Years. Provide a list of no more than five (5) of the most relevant contracts performed within the last five years. Provide any information currently available (letters, metrics, customer surveys, independent surveys, etc.) which demonstrates customer satisfaction with overall job performance and quality of completed product for relevant past efforts/contracts similar in scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires. Any contract information in excess of two (2) pages per contract listed shall be removed and shall not be considered for evaluation purposes. 2. PART I - PRICE PROPOSAL - Submit original and one (1) copy. (a) Complete blocks 8, 12, 13, 14, 15, and 16 of the RFP Section A, Standard Form 18. In doing so, the offeror accedes to the contract terms and conditions as written in the Request for Proposal (RFP) Sections A through K. These sections constitute the model contract. (b) Insert proposed unit prices in the attachment labled ESTIMATE BREAKDOWN and extended sum prices in Section B for each Contract Line Item Number (CLIN), ensure that the ESTIMATE BREAKDOWN is submitted both in electronic form via a CD disk and 2 paper copies. (c) Complete the necessary fill-ins and certifications in Sections I through K. Section K shall be returned in its entirety. For any other sections, the offeror shall only submit the pages, if any, that require a fill-in. Section H ESTIMATE BREAKDOWN shall be filled in and submitted both in paper form and electronic CD, and must be submitted in the same excel format provided in the attachment. (offerors must request a CD containing the ESTIMATE BREAKDOWN from the contracting officer). D. Documents submitted in response to this RFP must be fully responsive to and consistent with the following: 1. Requirements of the RFP Contract Line Items Numbers (CLINs), specifications and drawings, and government standards and regulations pertaining to the specifications and drawings. 2. Evaluation Factors for Award in Section M of this RFP. 3. Any limitation on the number of proposal pages. Pages exceeding the page limitations set forth in this Section L will not be read or evaluated, and will be removed from the proposal. 4. Format for proposal Part II shall be as follows: (a) A page is defined as one face of an 8 ½" x 11" sheet of paper containing information. (b) Typing shall not be less than 12 pitch. E. Proposal Submission: 1) Submit your proposal to arrive NOT LATER THAN 14 June 2012 12:00 P.M., LOCAL TIME. 2) All proposals delivered in response to this solicitation shall reflect the following information on the address label: a. Solicitation Number FA5270-12-T-0055. b. The legend, "To be delivered unopened to the Contracting Officer", and c. The volume and copy numbers contained in each box/envelope. 3) Submit your proposal to the following address: A1C Brian Austin 18 Contracting Squadron / LGCC Unit 5199, Bldg 95 APO, AP 96368 (Okinawa, Japan) (End of Provision) CONST-L-7302 CERTIFICATION FOR CONSTRUCTION PROJECT ENGINEERS a. The offerors will submit as a part of the proposal, a copy of the Japanese Certification Skill License of the proposed construction project engineer for this contract (as specified in the General Requirement of the Specifications). If the license is not a part of the original submission and the offeror refuses to submit same after request, the proposal may be rejected. b. When the contracting officer requires certification for construction project engineers, the offeror must submit a certificate of the skill license prior to execution of any contract to be awarded as a result of this solicitation. (End of provision) CONST-L-7303 MAGNITUDE OF CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS The magnitude of the estimate for this project is between $25,000 and $100,000. CONST-L-7304 CONTRACTOR PERFORMANCE IN JAPAN This project will be performed in its entirety in the country of Japan. The successful offeror must be licensed and registered to perform work in the country of Japan. (End of provision) GEN - L - 0001 Additional Information Concerning the Acquisition or Inquiry of Duns Numbers in Japan Contractors need to be aware that the Japanese Dun and Bradstreet will assess a fee for Duns Number inquiry or obtaining a new assignment affective 1 April 03. For more information see the following Web site: http://www.dnb.co.jp or send an e-mail to: jp-dunsrequest@dnb.com Section M - Evaluation Factors for Award CLAUSES INCORPORATED BY FULL TEXT CONST-M-7400 BASIS FOR CONTRACT AWARD (JUN 2006): This is a competitive best value source selection in which technical factor or subfactor will be evaluated on a pass/fail basis. All technically acceptable quotations shall be treated equally except for their prices. Failure to meet a requirement may result in a quotation being determined technically unacceptable. A quotation must clearly identify any exception to the solicitation terms and conditions and provide complete accompanying rationale. The evaluation process shall proceed as follows: A. Past Performance Acceptability. Next, the Government shall seek recent and relevant performance information on all technically acceptable offerors based on the past efforts provided by the offerors and data independently obtained from other government or commercial sources. The Government shall evaluate the past performance information on a pass/fail basis and assign an overall performance rating of Acceptable or Unacceptable. The purpose of the past performance evaluation is to allow the Government to assess the offeror's probability of meeting the solicitation requirements based on the offeror's demonstrated present and past performance. Relevant performance includes performance of efforts involving work that is similar or greater in scope, magnitude, and complexity than the effort described in the statement of work of this solicitation. Recent performance information includes relevant contracts performed for Department of Defense, Government of Japan, local US Government agencies, and commercial customers within the last five (5) years. Relevancy. The Government will use the following relevancy definitions when assessing recent, relevant contracts (Table 2): Table 2. Past Performance Relevancy Ratings Rating Definition Rating Definition Very Relevant Present/past performance effort involved essentially the same scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation Relevant Present/past performance effort involved similar scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires. Somewhat Relevant Present/past performance effort involved some of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires. Not Relevant Present/past performance effort involved little or none of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires. The assessment process will result in an overall performance rating of Acceptable or Unacceptable as defined in Table 3. Table 3, Past Performance Evaluation Ratings Rating Description Acceptable Based on the offeror's performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort, or the offeror's performance record is unknown. (See note below.) Unacceptable Based on the offeror's performance record, the Government has no reasonable expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort. B. Price Evaluation. Lastly, the Government shall rank all technically acceptable offerors by price. The price evaluation will document the reasonableness, realistic, and affordability of the proposed total evaluated price. C. After evaluation of both technical subfactors, past performance, and price proposals specified in the solicitation, the Contracting Officer will select that responsible source whose offer is technically acceptable, considering only the criteria included in the solicitation, and which offers the lowest evaluation price. D. Offerors are cautioned to submit sufficient information and in the format specified in Section L. Offerors may be asked to clarify certain aspects of their quotation such as techinical acceptability. Communication conducted to resolve minor or clerical errors will not constitute discussions and the contracting officer reserves the right to award a contract without the opportunity for quotation revision. (End of Provision) CONST-M-7401 REJECTION OF OFFERS (a) Offer on All: Offerors must propose on all item(s). Failure to do so shall be cause for rejection of offer. (Applies only to solicitations containing more than one (1) line item). (b) Separate Changes: Separate changes in any form, are not solicited. Offers containing separate changes will be rejected. (End of provision) CONST-M-7402 EVALUATION AND AWARD OF CONTRACT Evaluation and award will be made in accordance with FAR Provision 52.215-1, Instruction to Offerors-Competitive Acquisition. Since the Government intends to award a contract without discussions, offerors are cautioned to review carefully all terms and conditions, and specifications of the solicitation prior to proposal submission. NOTE: Options. The Government will evaluate offers for award purposes by adding the aggregate amount for all options to the cumulative total price for the basic requirement. The Government may determine that an offer is unacceptable if the option prices are significantly unbalanced. Evaluation of options shall not obligate the Government to exercise the option(s). A proposal is unbalanced when it is based on prices significantly less than cost for some work and prices that are significantly overstated for other work. Unrealistically low proposed costs/prices may be grounds for eliminating a proposal from competition either on the basis that the Offeror does not understand the requirement or the Offeror has made an unrealistic proposal. (End of provision)
- Web Link
-
FBO.gov Permalink
(https://www.fbo.gov/spg/USAF/PAF/18CONS/FA5270-12-T-0055/listing.html)
- Place of Performance
- Address: Okinawa, Japan, United States
- Record
- SN02764563-W 20120603/120602000336-c16c22734d76551f1cce30efa33d2958 (fbodaily.com)
- Source
-
FedBizOpps Link to This Notice
(may not be valid after Archive Date)
| FSG Index | This Issue's Index | Today's FBO Daily Index Page |