Loren Data's SAM Daily™

fbodaily.com
Home Today's SAM Search Archives Numbered Notes CBD Archives Subscribe
FBO DAILY ISSUE OF MARCH 03, 2012 FBO #3752
SPECIAL NOTICE

70 -- The Air Force is designing new client architectures for the years 2014 and beyond and is exploring a zero/thin-client solution for the Non-Secure Internet Protocol Router Network (NIPRNet) as well as the Secure Internet Protocol Router Network (SIPRNet).

Notice Date
3/1/2012
 
Notice Type
Special Notice
 
NAICS
541512 — Computer Systems Design Services
 
Contracting Office
Department of the Air Force, Air Force Space Command, 38 CONS, 4064 Hilltop Road, Tinker AFB, Oklahoma, 73145-2713, United States
 
ZIP Code
73145-2713
 
Solicitation Number
38CONS_LGCA_RFI1
 
Archive Date
5/1/2012
 
Point of Contact
Tisha McLelland, Phone: 4057345426, Tommie D Rushing, Phone: 405-734-7364
 
E-Mail Address
tisha.mclelland@tinker.af.mil, tommie.rushing@tinker.af.mil
(tisha.mclelland@tinker.af.mil, tommie.rushing@tinker.af.mil)
 
Small Business Set-Aside
N/A
 
Description
OFADD: 38 CONS/LGCA, 4064 Hilltop Road, Tinker AFB, OK 73145 SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR INFORMATION POC: Tisha McLelland, 405-734-5426, Contracting Officer DESC: This announcement constitutes a Request for Information (RFI) synopsis and market research. Information obtained as a result of this RFI is for planning purposes only. It does not constitute an Invitation for Sealed Bid or Requests for Proposal (RFP), nor is it to be construed as any commitment by the Government. Background: The Air Force is designing new client architectures for the years 2014 and beyond and is exploring a zero/thin-client solution for the Non-Secure Internet Protocol Router Network (NIPRNet) as well as the Secure Internet Protocol Router Network (SIPRNet). This zero/thin-client solution would reduce the amount of operations & maintenance (O&M) required as it would be managed at the enterprise level rather than the base level. This solution would include all server hardware, client hardware, server/network-based storage, profile management capability, and zero/thin-client hardware. This solution does not require multi-layer security, but does not preclude it. The goal/vision is to enable users to access AF desktop-like capabilities through any device, to include commercial mobile devices, through AF NIPRNet networks while reducing O&M/increasing security for AF NIPRNet/SIPRNet, and further to eliminate the need for storage of classified hard drives at the client location. The end state shall be in accordance with Information Life-cycle policies and procedures (AF Information Management/Data Management Policy, DoD Net-centric Data Strategy). Our current initiative calls for: • NIPRNet access via Common Access Card ([CAC], 5 volt) and SIPRNet access via Smart Card (SIPRNet Token, 3.5 volt) access on from any AF base (NIPRNet/SIPRNet) or through any data network (NIPRNet) via compatibility with all applicable and approved DoD/NSA Smart Card Readers as well as username/password • Must support up to 1,000,000 users on NIPRNet across the globe at 100+ bases Guard, Reserve, and recruiter locations (~400 total including previous bullet) • Must support up to 220,000 users on SIPRNet across the globe at 100+ bases • Must also support various Guard, Reserve, and recruiter locations (~400 total including previous bullet) • Must support up to 700,000 concurrent users on NIPRNet • Must support up to 75,000 concurrent users on SIPRNet • Persistent storage of user profile information (e.g., e-mail settings, printer settings, user documents, internet favorites) • Clean desktop presented to user each time they log in • Management of master image at the enterprise level • Highly available pool of virtual desktops (24/7/365 usage for some portion of systems at each base) • Following master image updates, individual pool of virtual desktops refreshed with updates within 30 minutes of selecting it to be updated • Anti-virus integrated, but without causing input/output operations per second (IOPS) storms • Disconnected operations capability for portion of users from each base • Ability to utilize existing desktop systems (fat clients) until hardware can be tech refreshed with zero client • Ability to stream individual applications (e.g., standard desktop configuration-based applications as well as custom apps such as command and control systems) based on users' security groups • Ability to use existing building network infrastructure at user location • Capacity planning tool utilization at each base prior to roll out of solution for those users • Support unified communications through video/messaging/voice/presence/collaboration, including the ability to run Defense Connect Online (DCO) • User experience at least as good as current desktop fat-client system for any/all applications being used for at least 80% of the user base • Support a pilot roll-out with 9000 users on NIPRNet and 6200 users on SIPRNet at Scott AFB IL • Training for AF/Government personnel to manage all aspects of the enterprise • Device should allow for separate USB port management • Device management suite to allow control/upgrades/etc. to be performed at the enterprise level • Significant transport layer delay not acceptable, possibly introducing the need for virtual desktop servers at each base, yet managed at the enterprise level • Capability should be device agnostic supporting commercial mobile devices (NIPRNet only requirement) • Support telework • Compliant with Unified Capability 2008 Rev 3 (http://www.disa.mil/_large_files/DOD_UCR_2008_Change_3.pdf) and future revisions The vendor's RFI submissions should answer the following questions: Overall: 1. How does the vendor's capability/concept support the AF goal/vision for the effort? 2. How well does your solution scale? 3. Does the proposed capability/concept rely on any proprietary standards to meet any of the Air Force's or Department of Defense's requirements? 4. Can your concept be remotely administered? 5. How does the proposed concept manage/support disaster recovery? • Can the solution/concept support Full, Differential, and Incremental back-ups directly to an off-site location? An on-site location? • Can the solution/concept support automated client/server back-ups? 6. What fault tolerance measures are utilized/supported by the proposed solution? • RAID levels, redundant power supplies, etc. 7. How much bandwidth does your capability typically use? 8. What other vendors are you partnered with and support the proposed solution? 9. What type of Active Directory architecture changes would need to be made to implement your solution? 10. How does your solution support port security through DoD and AF PKI certificate-based 802.1x? 11. What features whether listed above or not, are in development and will be available in future releases. • Describe in detail. • What standards are the features based on? • Is the proposed technology proprietary? 12. How many monitors does your environment support off of one desktop system (fat/thin/zero)? 13. Does your solution support commercial mobile devices, like iPads, smart phones, Android tablets, etc.? 14. Does your solution support wireless (e.g., 801.11G, N)? 15. What is the typical/peak bandwidth utilization per client/server? 16. Discuss your system's resilience in degraded network conditions on both the near and far ends and how it presents degradation in its logs. 17. Discuss what networking infrastructure is required and/or recommended to support the environment and why. 18. Discuss how your solution would work with security identifiers (SID) and global unique identifiers (GUID) in Active Directory. An enterprise solution of this size requires the ability to re-use these to avoid running out. Cost of Ownership: 19. What is the general projected Total Cost of Ownership (TCO)? Please provide a generic commercial cost of hardware/software investment needed to stand up a solution for users across multiple bases and the recurring annual cost(s). Also address associated training costs. 20. What equipment will be required to fulfill the solution? How does the solution use existing equipment? Is any of the equipment proprietary? Security: 21. Does the solution for NIPRNet support Common Access Card (CAC) and DoD Public Key Infrastructure? 22. What ports and protocols does the proposed solution/concept use? 23. What measures/mechanisms are used to ensure data is accessible to authorized individuals/systems? 24. Does the solution for SIPRNet support the SIPRNet Token and DoD Public Key Infrastructure (PKI)? 25. Describe how the solution addresses Network Access Protection (NAP) and Network Access Control (NAC) considerations in an environment that includes mixed clients. 26. What capabilities does the solution provide for containing viruses and malicious code? 27. What capabilities does the solution provide to deal with a Classified Message Incident (CMI) or other event where information of a higher classification is found where it should not be? For example, SECRET info on the NIPRNet servers; Top Secret or Secure Compartmented Information info on the SECRET systems. System Administration: 28. What is the expected administrator to user ratio? 29. Explain how the solution load balances resources and ensures high availability/continuity of operations during high periods of high volume usage and outages? Are there any critical points of failure and what are mitigating actions? 30. How is the solution managed over a WAN? - Consider an enterprise that serves hundreds of thousands of users in many countries and in many autonomous systems. 31. How will the solution automatically and securely accept and apply centrally (AFNETOPS) pushed patches and upgrades? Will manual processes be required to apply patches? Environment: 32. How does the solution scale over an enterprise? Does it operate over a Wide Area Network (WAN)? What is the largest deployment you have accomplished with your proposed solution? 33. What are the infrastructure requirements for local area networks (LANs), metropolitan area networks (MANs) and WANs? What limitations, if any, exist for each case? 34. What are the physical server space requirements per user? What about power and cooling requirements? 35. What actions are required by the AF to prepare our environment (storage, user profile changes, email applications) to ensure successful implementation of your product? 36. If there will be multiple server sites, how will sites back-up each other in case of disaster? For example, if servers at base A go down, users would be diverted to servers at base B. Data Backup and Recovery: 37. What kind of data backup method is used? Business Case: 38. From a business case perspective, how does your product improve operations for your customers? What kinds of returns do they see? 39. Can you provide positive examples of the benefits resulting from adoption on your solution? 40. What has been the impact on performance and security for customers switching to your technology? 41. Can you provide examples of savings reported by your customers resulting from decreased system management/support costs? 42. Can you provide examples of total cost of ownership savings reported by your customers as a resulting of implementing your solution? 43. Has or can your product provide benefit to users working in a multi-domain security environment? Has its use been evaluated/accredited in such an environment? Responders are encouraged to submit additional information regarding all solutions they believe will meet some or all the requirements. In your response to this RFI, please identify other developer/vendor products that are interoperable with your solutions. Businesses responding to the RFI must provide information regarding the above capabilities by 16 Apr 12, 1600 (CDT). The Air Force may choose to host vendors for on-site meetings or demonstrations after the initial response period if additional information is needed, but make your initial response as complete as reasonably possible. In the event vendor visits are solicited, only those who have expressed an interest by responding within the response period per the terms of this RFI will be invited to visit. Potential vendors shall provide all questions via electronic mail by 16 Mar 12, 1600 (CDT) to tisha.mclelland@tinker.af.mil. All comments and questions must be in writing and identify the company source, address, contact person, E-Mail and telephone number.
 
Web Link
FBO.gov Permalink
(https://www.fbo.gov/notices/7ab31885b591c6a281441213785eca66)
 
Record
SN02686605-W 20120303/120301234708-7ab31885b591c6a281441213785eca66 (fbodaily.com)
 
Source
FedBizOpps Link to This Notice
(may not be valid after Archive Date)

FSG Index  |  This Issue's Index  |  Today's FBO Daily Index Page |
ECGrid: EDI VAN Interconnect ECGridOS: EDI Web Services Interconnect API Government Data Publications CBDDisk Subscribers
 Privacy Policy  Jenny in Wanderland!  © 1994-2024, Loren Data Corp.