PRESOL | L | Formation and Maintenance of a Technical Advisory Group for United - Package #1

FBO DAILY ISSUE OF JUNE 25, 2011 FBO #3500
SOLICITATION NOTICE

L -- Formation and Maintenance of a Technical Advisory Group for United - Package #1

Notice Date: 6/23/2011
Notice Type: Combined Synopsis/Solicitation
NAICS: 541611 — Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services
Contracting Office: Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration, Office of Acquisitions and Grants Services, 5630 Fishers Lane, Room 2129, Rockville, Maryland, 20857-0001
ZIP Code: 20857-0001
Solicitation Number: FDA1089456
Archive Date: 8/3/2011
Point of Contact: Emily Hunt, Phone: 3018277171, Patricia M Pemberton, Phone: 301-827-1022
E-Mail Address: emily.hunt@fda.hhs.gov, patricia.pemberton@fda.hhs.gov
(emily.hunt@fda.hhs.gov, patricia.pemberton@fda.hhs.gov)
Small Business Set-Aside: N/A
Description: Pricing Schedule This is a combined synopsis/solicitation for commercial items prepared in accordance with the format in FAR 12.6. This announcement constitutes the only solicitation and a written solicitation will not be issued. This synopsis, NAICS code 541611, identified as FDA1089456, is to notify contractors that the government intends to issue a Purchase Order in accordance with FAR Part 13.106 for the following specifications, under the simplified acquisition procedures. Prospective offerors are responsible for downloading the solicitation and any amendments. It is the offeror's responsibility to monitor the FedBizOpps website for the release of any amendments to this solicitation. Hard copies will only be provided to individuals eligible under the Americans with Disabilities Act and Rehabilitation Act upon request. The Government reserves the right to award a contract without discussions if the Contracting Officer determines that the initial offer(s) is/are providing the Best Value and discussions are not necessary. Title: Formation and Maintenance of a Technical Advisory Group for United States Representation on ISO Technical Committee 34 Subcommittee 9 BACKGROUND The purpose of this contract is to form and maintain a technical advisory group (TAG) that will represent the United States on the International Organization for Standardization's (ISO) Technical Committee 34 (TC 34) Subcommittee 9 (SC 9). ISO is an international non governmental organization, based in Geneva, Switzerland, that is a network of 163 national standards institutes including the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) whose headquarters are located in Washington, DC. ISO's mission is to provide "International Standards for Business, Government and Society." A central role of ISO is to make trade between countries easier and fairer by harmonizing standards among nations. For example, ISO 17025:2005 (General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories) specifies the general competencies that microbiological and chemical testing laboratories must possess in order to be considered reliable for food testing. FDA laboratories are ISO L1025:2005 certified, as are the vast majority of regulatory laboratories around the world. This certification allows for a certain level of trust and confidence that would otherwise not be available if there were no common standards. ISO methods are internationally recognized and have a significant impact on trade. For example, ISO methods are recognized by organizations such as the European Committee for Standardization (CEN) which is comprised of the 31 member states of the European Union (EU). As enunciated by the CEN on its website http:i/rvu'w.cen,eulcer/AboutUs/Pages/defauh.aspx): "These standards have a unique status since they also are national standards in each of its 31 Member countries. With one common standard in all these countries and every conflicting national standard withdrawn, a product can reach a far wider market with much lower development and testing costs. European Standards help build a European Intemal Market for goods and services and position Europe in the global economy. More than 60.000 technical experts as well as business federations, consumer and other societal interest organizations are involved in the CEN network that reaches over 480 million people." The Vienna Agreement signed by CEN in 1991 with ISO, its international counterpart- ensures technical cooperation by correspondence, mutual representation at meetings, coordination meetings, and adoption of the same text, as both an ISO Standard and as a European Standard. Thus, ISO methods, including those for food microbiology, are the official reference methods of the EU and all of its member states. ISO has an important and significant role in the standardization of food microbiological testing methods. It exercises this role through TC 34lSC 9. TC 34 is responsible for the international standards of "Food Products" and SC 9 is specifically responsible for food microbiology. SC 9 is comprised of 30 participating/voting nations and24 observing/non-voting nations, as well as 14 liaison non-governmental organizations. These liaison organizations include, but are not limited to, AOAC International, International Commission of Microbiological Specifications for Foods, and the World Health Organization. TC 34lSC 9 is responsible for 62 standards. Microbiological standards or methods, under the purview of TC 34lSC 9, include those for pathogens such as Salmonella (ISO 6579:2002), Listeria monocytogeres (ISO 11290, parts 1 and 2), and E. coli OI57:H7 (ISO 16654:2001) to name a few. All food microbiological methods relevant to the FDA arise from TC 34lSC 9. The United States is currently neither a participant nor observer nation on ISO TC 34lSC 9. Consequently, it has no official input regarding the adoption of microbiological testing methods for foods even though its public health and trade interests arc at stake. The intent of this statement of work is to remedy this situation by forming a TAG that would represent the interests of the United States on ISO TC 34lSC 9. TAGs represent the interests of nations and are composed of representatives from government, industry and academia who arrive at consensus positions regarding their areas of expertise. Members of US TAG for TC 34lSC 9 will, with the support of their organizations, participate in working groups that will develop and validate microbiological methods for the detection of bacterial pathogens in foods. Creation of a TAG will provide the US with a vote on TC 34lSC 9 and enable the US to share its knowledge and resources in the development and validation of ISO reference methods. Formation of this TAG will advance FDA's public health mission by allowing it, as an active participant, to ensure the accuracy and reliability of ISO reference methods. Having accurate and reliable ISO reference methods is a key step in making imported foods safer for US consumers. SCOPE OF WORK The contractor tasks include: Direct Administration of the US TAG for ISO TC 34l SC 9 Organization of the US TAG.Approval by ANSI of the TAG administrator and initial TAG membership list and accreditation of the TAG. Submission of the US TAG membership list and annual report to ANSI for review by the Executive Standards Council (ExSC) or its designee. Ensure an active membership of the US TAG by monitoring their participation. Provide administrative services, including arrangements for meetings, timely preparation and distribution of documents related to the work of the US TAG, and maintenance of appropriate records, including meetings minutes and results of letter ballots. Transmission US proposals and US positions, as developed and approved by the US TAG to ANSI. Transmission of US delegate lists for all international meetings to ANSI. Establish a procedure to hear appeals of actions or inactions of the US TAG. Complying with the requirements associated with ANSI oversight and supervision of the activities of the U.S. TAG and its administrator in accordance with ANSI International Procedures clause 2.5. Ensure compliance with applicable ANSI and ISO procedures. CONTRACTOR'S TECHNICAL WORKPLAN Deliverables 1. Organize the US TAG. 2. Maintain the TAG membership list. This includes both soliciting participation on the TAG and ensuring that the membership is active by monitoring their participation. 3. Provide administrative services, including arrangements for meetings, timely preparation and distribution of documents related to the work of the US TAG, and maintenance of appropriate records, including meetings minutes and results of letter ballots. 4. Transmit US proposals and US positions, as developed and approved by the US TAG to ANSI. 5. Transmit of US delegate list for all international meetings to ANSI. 6. Establish a procedure, with input from the project officer, to hear appeals of actions or inactions of the US TAG. 7. Ensure compliance with applicable ANSI and ISO procedures. 8. Ensure compliance with the requirements associated with ANSI oversight and supervision of the activities of the U.S. TAG and its administrator in accordance with ANSI International Procedures clause 2.5. The requirements of Section 2.5 are as follows: 2.5 Accreditation of U.S. TAGs 2.5.1 General. U.S. TAGs shall be accredited by ANSI and must operate in compliance with the ANSI Criteria for the Development and Coordination of U.S. Positions in the International Standardization Activities of the ISO and IEC. 2.5.2 Criteria for Accreditation. U.S. TAG accreditation shall be based on compliance with the following criteria: 1. The U.S. TAG is in compliance with the criteria for balance and openness as outlined in sections B4.1 and 84.2 of the ANSI Criteria for the Development and Coordination of U.S. Positions in the International Standardization Activities of the ISO and IEC (see Annex B) 2. The U.S. TAG operating procedures for developing and coordinating U.S. positions shall conform to the requirements of the ANSI Criteria for the Development and Coordination of U.S, Positions in the International Standardization Activities of the ISO and IEC (see Annex B) 3. The U.S. TAG administrator shall agree to assume the functions given in section 2.3.3 2.5.3 Application. The prospective U.S. TAG administrator shall submit an application to ANSI for U.S. TAG accreditation as well as an application for approval of the U.S. TAG administrator and the U.S. TAG membership list and shall provide the pertinent operating procedures. Following the public review period the ExSC shall consider the information supplied by its designee if any, the applicant, and any comments received. The ExSC shall determine whether the application for accreditation of the U.S. TAG, the application for approval as U.S. TAG administrator, and the initial U.S. TAG membership list should be approved. The applicant shall meet all of the criteria in section 2.5.2before accreditation can be granted. If there is no designee, the application for approval of the U.S. TAG administrator and the U.S. TAG membership list and the application for accreditation shall be forwarded directly to the ExSC. Upon accreditation, the applicant shall be notified and a notice shall appear in Standards Action. In the event that accreditation is not granted, the ExSC shall advise the applicant ofthe reasons and the applicant shall have the opportunity to reapply and, if desired, appeal the decision (see 2.6.) 2.5.4 Accreditation of U.S. TAGs for Subcommittees of ISO Technical Committees. If a U.S. TAG to an ISO subcommittee has the authority to perform all of the functions of a U.S. TAG as outlined in section 2.2.3 without oversight by the U.S. TAG to the ISO technical committee, then the U.S. TAG for the ISO subcommittee shall be accredited in accordance with sections 2.4 and 2.5 of these procedures. 2.5.5 Maintenance of Accreditation. The ExSC shall provide for oversight and supervision of accredited U.S. TAGs and TAG administrators to confirm adherence to the criteria for accreditation and to confirm that the procedures and practices of the accredited U.S. TAG continue to be consistent with those that formed the basis for accreditation. This oversight and supervision activity shall apply to all U.S. TAGs regardless of whether an external organization or ANSI serves as U.S. TAG administrator. The activity shall consist of the following elements, designed to achieve the objectives while minimizing the burden on U.S. TAGs and U.S. TAG administrators.2.5.5.1 Review of Revisions to U.S. TAG Procedures. The procedures of the U.S. TAG shall be in compliance with the ANSI International Procedures at all times. Whenever the procedures of the accredited U.S. TAG are revised, the ExSC shall be notified. If the changes are considered bythe ExSC to be substantive, notice of the revisions shall appear in Standards Action with a call for comment. Copies of the revised procedures shall be available from the U.S. TAG administrator upon request. Following the comment period, the ExSC shall consider the comments received, the latest audit of the accredited U.S. TAG, and any additional information available to determine whether to reaffirm the accreditation. Notice of reaffirmation shall be sent to the accredited U.S. TAG and shall appear in Standards Action. 2.5.5.2 Annual Reporting. An annual report shall be prepared by each U.S. TAG administrator, describing in summary narrative form the U.S. TAG activity during the past year. The report shall be submitted to the ExSC or its designee no later than January 3l of the following year. In satisfying this requirement, meeting minutes and other appropriate reports and documents may be incorporated or appended, or referred to if previously distributed by ANSI. The annual report shall include: 1. Information on meetings (including attendees), actions taken, and the work program 2. Current TAG membership list which shall include: a) Title and designation of the U.S. TAG b) Scope of the U.S. TAG c) U.S. TAG administrator (name of organization, name of secretary, address(es), telephone number) d) U.S. TAG officers (chairman and other offlrcers) e) Members: i) Names of the individuals and alternates (as applicable) and their addresses and business affiliations including names of the organizations they are representing on the U.S. TAG ii) The interest categories of the U.S. TAG shall be defined and the category of each member identified. 3. A list of any problems encountered during the past year in the functioning of the U.S. TAG or U.S. TAG administration, and any areas in which the U.S. TAG administrator requires assistance by ANSI 4. An express certification by the U.S. TAG administrator that the U.S. TAG iras been and continues to be operated in a manner that complies with all applicable ANSI and ISO procedures 5. The results of any self-audit held during the past year If the U.S. TAG or TAG Administrator has a concern with either the conduct or results of a self-audit completed to assure adherence to its own procedures and applicable ANSI and ISO criteria and procedures, it may be brought to the attention of the ExSC. 2.5.5.3 Complaint Notification. Each U.S. TAG administrator shall forward to the ExSC or its designee, upon receipt, a copy of any complaint concerning the manner in which the U.S. TAG is operating o-r ttt" U.S' TAG administration is being conducted. Copies of the U,S. TAG administrator."rponr" to the parry lodging the complaint, and all subsequent related correspondence, shall also be sent to the ExSC or iti designee. 2.5.5.4 ANSI Audits. The ExSC on its own initiative, or upon recommendation from a designee, shall alrange for audits of accredited U.S. TAGs and TAG administrators at selected intervals commensurate with the level of activity of each U.S. TAG and evidence of compliance with procedural rules and other requirements. The purpose of such audits is to validate the U.S. TAG's annual certification that it is operating according to applicable ANSI and ISo procedures, and to identifier areas where ANSI can help the U.S. TAG improve its operation. The audit will examine: 1. Procedures in use by the U.S. TAG governing the development of U.S. positions 2. Knowledge of and compliance with ISO and ANSI requirements 3. Records of compliance and their maintenance 4. Adherence to ANSI due process and consensus criteria 5. Balloting procedures and results 6. Documentation of attempts to resolve objections 7. Appeal mechanism and its implementation An audit report shall be prepared and provided to the U.S. TAG administrator for review. Thereafter the report and comment by the U.S. TAG and TAG administrator, if any, shall be submitted to the ExSC. The ExSC shall take appropriate actions with respect to the audit findings, which may range from commendation to a request for remedial action by the U.S. TAG or TAG administrator- ANSI representatives shall assist the U.S. TAG and TAG administrator regarding any corrective steps found desirable. 2.5.5.5 Transfer of U.S. TAG Administrator. In those instances where a U.S. TAG administrator is unable to continue serving, ANSI shall be notified immediately. If a change in the entity that serves as the TAG Administrator is sought by both the TAG and the TAG Administrator and the new TAG Administrator agrees to use the TAG's existing procedures or the Modet Operating Procedures for U.S. TAGs to ANSIfor ISO Activities contained in Annex A, then the following shall apply: (a) The current or the proposed TAG Administrator shall prepare and circulate a ballot for TAG approval of the new TAG Administrator. (b) Upon closure of the ballot, a copy of the voting results shall be transmitted to the TAG pursuant to the TAG's currently accredited procedures: If a two-thirds affirmative vote of the total voting membership of the TAG is not achieved, and the TAG Administrator does not wish to continue to serve, then the ExSC shall be so notified in writing. The accreditation of the TAG shall be withdrawn by the ExSC as a result in accordance with 2.5.6 herein. If a two-thirds affirmative vote of the total voting membership of the consensus body is achieved, then the following procedures shall apply, (c) A notice shall be sent to the Secretary of the ExSC notifying it of the change in TAG Administrator, the reasons therefore, a copy of the voting results that indicate the TAG's acceptance of the proposed change and a certification that the new TAG Administrator shall operate in accordance with the TAG's currently accredited procedures or the Model Operating Procedures for U.S. TAGs to ANSI for ISO Activities. (d) The Secretary of the ExSC shall place an announcement of the transfer of responsibility to the new TAG Administrator in Standards Action to solicit public comment. The comment period shall be 30 days. (e) The ExSC shall consider any comments received during the public comment period. If no comments are received, then an informative announcement confirming the change of TAG Administrator shall be made in Standards Action. If comments are received, the ExSC shall require that the TAG and the proposed new TAG Administrator respond adequately to such comments prior to final approval by the ExSC. 2.5.5.6 Termination of U.S. TAG. A proposal to terminate a U.S. TAG may be made by directly and materially affected interests. The proposal shall be submitted in writing to ANSI and to the U.S. TAG administrator and shall include the reasons why the U.S. TAG should be terminated. The U.S. TAG in accordance with A7.6 shall take action. In the event that the U.S. holds the secretariat for a ISO TC or SC for which the U.S. TAG is considering termination, the organization serving as secretariat shall be informed promptly and shall submit their position regarding termination of the TAG to ANSI and to the TAG administrator. As a result of action taken in accordance with A7.6, if termination of the TAG is approved, notification of such action shall be announced in Standards Action. The announcement shall note that dissolution of the TAG will result in the U.S. relinquishing its P- (participant) status in the international activity. Also, if the U.S. serves as international secretariat, the announcement shall state that the U.S. will resign as international secretariat. The appropriate notification(s) shall be sent to ISO regarding the change in status, and the relinquishment of the secretariat, if applicable. 2.5.6 Withdrawal of Accreditation. If the conditions upon which accreditation was granted are not maintained, the U.S. TAG shall be advised of the conditions which need to be corrected and requested to take corrective action. If such action is not taken within the time period designated by the ExSC, notification of the intent to withdraw accreditation shall be given, stating the conditions that require correction. Thereafter, the ExSC is authorized to withdraw accreditation upon 30 days written notice unless corrective action has been taken. The U.S. TAG shall be notified of the withdrawal of accreditation and a notice shall appear in Standards Action. The period of performance for this task order is July 1, 2011 to May 3I,2012. Security and Privacy It is not anticipated that the Contractor will be exposed to sensitive Agency information or data. But, the Contractor agrees that contract personnel will not divulge or release information or data developed or obtained in connection with performance of this contract, unless made public by FDA or upon written approval by the Project Officer. Contractor Conformance with Applicable Laws, Regulations, Policies, and Standards The Contractor shall be responsible for knowledge of and compliance with all applicable federal information technology and information management laws, regulations, policies and standards at the government-wide, HHS, and FDA levels. At the government-wide level, these include Office of Management and Budget (OMB), National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) and General Accounting Office (GAO). These can be primarily found at or through the Federal CIO Council website at: http://www.cio.gov. HHS documents are found at http://www.cdc.gov/irmo Payment Terms: The Contractor shall submit the cost per audit (include on-site audit, documenting audit findings, and review and revise final audit report). For each 90-day period of the contract (based upon the performance period), a Quarterly Summary Report (Form FDA 2684) of the audits and travel expenses shall be prepared. Included with the report shall be the contract number, a list of audits completed specifying the name and city of the state agency, and audit dates. In those periods where no audits were performed, a report showing no audits is required. A proper invoice is required. Invoices will be approved at the negotiated rate along with submittal of the Quarterly Summary Report. Invoices will not be approved without the Quarterly Summary Report. Therefore, timely submission is critical to expedite voucher/invoice processing and payment. Payment will be made after the deliverables are reviewed by DFSR. PRICING TABLE: Attachment one FAR provisions can be found on the following website: http://www.arnet.gov. The following provisions apply to this acquisition: FAR 52.212-1, Instructions to Offerors-Commercial Items; 52.225-2 Buy American Certificate; 52.212-4 Contract Terms and Conditions-Commercial Items; 52.212-5 Contract Terms and Conditions Required to Implement Statutes or Executive Orders-Commercial Items including subparagraphs: 52.222-3, Convict Labor 52.222-19, Child Labor-Cooperation with Authorities and Remedies 52.222-21, Prohibition of Segregated Facilities 52.222-26, Equal Opportunity 52.222-36, Affirmative Action for Workers with Disabilities 52.222-50, Combating Trafficking in Persons 52.225-1, Buy American Act--Supplies 52.225-13, Restrictions on Certain Foreign Purchases 52.232-33, Payment by Electronic Fund Transfer-Central Contractor Registration. 52.217-8, Option to Extend Services 52.212-2 EVALUATION -- COMMERCIAL ITEMS (JAN 1999) (a) The Government will award a contract resulting from this solicitation to the responsible offeror whose offer conforming to the solicitation will be most advantageous to the Government, price and other factors considered. The following factors shall be used to evaluate offers: Technical and past performance, when combined, are more important than cost or price. As offerors' rating for non-price factors approach equivalency, price becomes more important in the award decision. As pricing approaches equivalency, the non-price factors becomes more important in the award decision. (b) Options. The Government will evaluate offers for award purposes by adding the total price for all options to the total price for the basic requirement. The Government may determine that an offer is unacceptable if the option prices are significantly unbalanced. Evaluation of options shall not obligate the Government to exercise the option(s). (c) A written notice of award or acceptance of an offer, mailed or otherwise furnished to the successful offeror within the time for acceptance specified in the offer, shall result in a binding contract without further action by either party. Before the offer's specified expiration time, the Government may accept an offer (or part of an offer), whether or not there are negotiations after its receipt, unless a written notice of withdrawal is received before award. ADDENDUM TO 52.212-2, EVALUATION -- COMMERCIAL ITEMS (JAN 1999) Evaluation of Quotations Quotations received in response to the synopsis/solicitation will be evaluated based on best value to Government. Specifically, the best value approach permits the Government to select the most advantageous offer based on price factors and non-price factors. The proposals will be evaluated on the following factors: Evaluation Criteria: 1) Proposed Type of Personnel (Contains two subfactors) The following evaluation subfactors are of equal weight. Subfactor 1 The offeror will be evaluated on its approach to the staffing and the execution of the requirements found in the Statement of Work. The offeror shall demonstrate the ability to provide the personnel requisite to perform organizational and administrative functions necessary to organize and administer a technical advisory group (TAG) to represent the United States at the International Organization for Standardization's (ISO) Technical Committee (TC 34) Subcommittee (SC) 9. In particular, the offeror must demonstrate in-depth and detailed knowledge of American National Standards Institute (ANSI) International Procedures clause 2.5 as well as all ISO and ANSI policies and procedures relevant to organizing and administering a US TAG. The offeror shall select an individual who will be considered the key person in conjunction with this contract. Subfactor 2 The offeror will be evaluated on its ability to demonstrate that it has personnel available who possess the capabilities listed in the Statement of Work, which sets forth the various administrative and organizational requirements necessary to fulfill this contract. 2) Technical Approach The offeror will be evaluated on the soundness and workability of the proposed technical approach that will ensure a high probability of high quality technical performance. This discussion should demonstrate the contractor's ability to organize a US TAG, maintain membership lists, transmit US proposals and positions to ANSI, transmit the US delegate list for all international meetings to ANSI, establish a procedure to hear appeals of actions or inactions of the US TAG (with input from the project officer), ensure compliance with applicable ANSI and ISO procedures, and ensure compliance with ANSI requirements associated with the oversight and supervision of activities of the U.S. TAG and its administrator in accordance with ANSI International Procedures clause 2.5. 3) Organizational Experience (Contains two subfactors) The following evaluation subfactors are of equal weight. Subfactor 1 The offeror will be evaluated on their ability to demonstrate experience in organizing and administering an ISO TAG as described in the Statement of Work. Information demonstrating this ability will be provided to FDA in a tabular format where the title(s) of currently administered TAGs, contracting agency and/or organization(s), agency and/or organization(s) point of contact, and dollar amounts are presented. Subfactor 2 The offeror will be evaluated on the ability to demonstrate that their available personnel have experience in organizing and administering an ISO TAG as described in the Statement of Work. 4) Data Access and Resources The offeror will be evaluated on the ability to demonstrate a good awareness of the regulated industries, trade associations, relevant consumer organizations, and academia involved with food microbiology. Also, the offeror should demonstrate the ability to properly identify stakeholders in the food microbiological community. 5) Availability of Facilities and Computer Services Support The offeror will be evaluated on the ability to demonstrate that it can provide a liaison with FDA at least once a month on this project. Computer services must be provided that are compatible with FDA's operating system and standard desktop programs. FDA's current standard operating system is Windows XP and standard desktop program is Microsoft Office 2007. 6) Project Management The offeror will be evaluated on the ability to provide information on the overall administration of the project tasks. This shall include management plans, methods for implementing, reviewing and effecting interim adjustments and corrections, and quality control over deliverables and cost control procedures. 7) Past Performance The government is seeking to determine whether the quoters have consistently demonstrated a commitment to customer satisfaction and timely delivery of high quality products services. Quoters shall submit a list and description of the last similar 3 large contracts completed during the past three years and all contracts currently in process. Quoters shall be evaluated on (1) record of conforming to SOW of good workmanship; (2) adherence to contract schedules, Price Evaluation: The quoters shall provide a price in accordance with the requirements of the SOW. The proposed price shall include a 60 months period on a yearly basis. If the technical proposals are essentially equal or are approximately equal in the technical ability, then the award may be made on the basis of lowest price. Additionally, price would be evaluated on the basis of its realism and acceptability FDA intends to make an award soon after the response date of this notice and all quotations must be submitted via email and be received by 1:00PM Eastern Time on 19, July 2011 to the attention of Emily Hunt, Emily.Hunt@fda.hhs.gov. Offerors shall ensure the Synopsis/Solicitation number is visible in the header of the email. ALL QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS SYNOPSIS/SOLICIATION MUST BE SUBMITTED IN WRITING NO LATER THAN 5:00 PM EASTERN TIME ON July 8th, 2011. FAX QUOTES SHALL NOT BE ACCEPTED.
Web Link: FBO.gov Permalink
(https://www.fbo.gov/spg/HHS/FDA/DCASC/FDA1089456/listing.html)
Place of Performance: Address: 5100 Paint Branch PKWY, College Park, Maryland, 20740, United States; Zip Code: 20740
Record: SN02480610-W 20110625/110623235101-e1d37163c7a9e3e6e524dc14a1f8dd6c (fbodaily.com)
Source: FedBizOpps Link to This Notice
(may not be valid after Archive Date)

| FSG Index | This Issue's Index | Today's FBO Daily Index Page |

Loren Data's SAM Daily™

L -- Formation and Maintenance of a Technical Advisory Group for United - Package #1