Loren Data's SAM Daily™

fbodaily.com
Home Today's SAM Search Archives Numbered Notes CBD Archives Subscribe
FBO DAILY ISSUE OF MARCH 03, 2011 FBO #3386
MODIFICATION

R -- Contractor Logistics Support (CLS)

Notice Date
3/1/2011
 
Notice Type
Modification/Amendment
 
NAICS
517919 — All Other Telecommunications
 
Contracting Office
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE; OO ALC GHSK SPACE 3CI;6049WARDLEIGH RD BLDG 1207; HILL AIR FORCE BASE; UT; 84056
 
ZIP Code
84056
 
Solicitation Number
FA8217-11-R-72515
 
Response Due
3/25/2011
 
Point of Contact
Jody L Lindley, Phone: 801- 586-1126, Patricia L Hunka, Phone: 801-586-3360
 
E-Mail Address
jody.lindley@hill.af.mil, patricia.hunka@hill.af.mil
(jody.lindley@hill.af.mil, patricia.hunka@hill.af.mil)
 
Small Business Set-Aside
Total Small Business
 
Description
Q: The Performance Work Statement and the Request For Proposal specifically require offerors to address "make or buy decisions" and "capital investment considerations" in the Transition Plan. We are also to use CDRL A010, DID DI-MGMT-80790, and DoD 4245.7-M to guide our response regarding these two topics. It is our understanding and experience that DoD 4245.7-M is guidance to be used to minimize risks when transitioning between acquisition lifecycle phases that apply primarily to development and acquisition of weapon systems. It is our assertion that the scope of work for the TDC contract does not involve development, production, or manufacturing. We also assert that modernization and improvements of factory operations is not within the scope of work. Is it the government's intention that offerors address "make or buy decisions" and "capital investment considerations" in the Transition Plan using the context and guidance provided in DoD 4245.7-M? If it is not the government's intention, then can you provide us an example for how you would like offerors to address these issues? If the government cannot provide examples, would a general discussion of these issues in a generic context, i.e., financial considerations that increase/decrease risk, be acceptable to the government? A: The PWS Section 7.1 and CDRL A010 have been updated on amendment 5 of the RFP. Q: Reference Attachment 1 - TDC Equipment. About half way through the long list of equipment items, there is a line that reads: Part Number: BENCHSTOCK Desc: BENCHSTOCK SEE NOTES SN: blank QTY: 8,220 Please provide additional description of these 8,220 items. If the items are small piece parts (bolts, screws, small hand held tools, etc.) please advise how the government would like the awardee to properly account for these items during the inventory transition from the incumbent contractor? A: The TEP has been updated to remove this from the list on amendment 5 of the RFP.
 
Web Link
FBO.gov Permalink
(https://www.fbo.gov/spg/USAF/AFMC/OOALC/FA8217-11-R-72515/listing.html)
 
Record
SN02390639-W 20110303/110301235013-ab521303613c926c78ee6859571f9ef4 (fbodaily.com)
 
Source
FedBizOpps Link to This Notice
(may not be valid after Archive Date)

FSG Index  |  This Issue's Index  |  Today's FBO Daily Index Page |
ECGrid: EDI VAN Interconnect ECGridOS: EDI Web Services Interconnect API Government Data Publications CBDDisk Subscribers
 Privacy Policy  Jenny in Wanderland!  © 1994-2024, Loren Data Corp.