Loren Data's SAM Daily™

fbodaily.com
Home Today's SAM Search Archives Numbered Notes CBD Archives Subscribe
FBO DAILY ISSUE OF SEPTEMBER 11, 2009 FBO #2848
MODIFICATION

70 -- RAID STORAGE SYSTEMS (Brand Name or Equal)

Notice Date
9/9/2009
 
Notice Type
Modification/Amendment
 
NAICS
423430 — Computer and Computer Peripheral Equipment and Software Merchant Wholesalers
 
Contracting Office
Department of Commerce, National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), Acquisition Management Division, 100 Bureau Drive, Building 301, Room B129, Mail Stop 1640, Gaithersburg, Maryland, 20899-1640
 
ZIP Code
20899-1640
 
Solicitation Number
NB184000-9-06285
 
Archive Date
9/26/2009
 
Point of Contact
Richard Cordero, Phone: 3019753976, Joseph L. Widdup, Phone: (301) 975-6324
 
E-Mail Address
rcordero@nist.gov, joseph.widdup@nist.gov
(rcordero@nist.gov, joseph.widdup@nist.gov)
 
Small Business Set-Aside
N/A
 
Description
The Purpose of this amendment is to provide questions and answers Question: Explain: zero rebuilt time requirement NIST response: If the logical drives in the raid are small enough (12 drives per RAID 6 set), the dynamic pool function allows the System set to rebuild nearly instantaneously following a drive failure and this occurs transparently to the user. Question: J-bods/disk enclosures are chassis you would hang below the primary dual controller unit. If you want 41.4TB as listed in your requirement you would need 1 x Single Dual controller unit followed by 3 x 2U 12 bay J-bods/disk enclosures for a total of 48 drive support. You are asking for 2 x Solutions so we would double that. Please confirm this type of configuration is correct. A requiring 4 x 2U Dual controller unit does not make sense. Using JBODS behind the primary controller makes sense. Response:Yes, that is one correct configuration. Each raid system would have 1 dual controller’s primary enclosure and 3 sata/sas secondary enclosure that are populated with disks. (not all vendor propose this type of configuration but this is one way to satisfy the requirement). To NIST perspective, we do not want to dictate how the system is configured, as long as it has 48 drives that include 12 SAS and 36 SATA drives. All of these drives are managed by a dual controller head. Question: Please clarify where it calls for “if required” means product must be capable but you do not wish to have us include price in total? After all low bid who meets minimum specifications wins. NIST response: “if required” means the system must support the feature sets but include it as an optional upgrade (not included in the total cost).
 
Web Link
FBO.gov Permalink
(https://www.fbo.gov/spg/DOC/NIST/AcAsD/NB184000-9-06285/listing.html)
 
Record
SN01946631-W 20090911/090910000222-7e2e3106a5f20b26a8221cf87ab128d1 (fbodaily.com)
 
Source
FedBizOpps Link to This Notice
(may not be valid after Archive Date)

FSG Index  |  This Issue's Index  |  Today's FBO Daily Index Page |
ECGrid: EDI VAN Interconnect ECGridOS: EDI Web Services Interconnect API Government Data Publications CBDDisk Subscribers
 Privacy Policy  Jenny in Wanderland!  © 1994-2024, Loren Data Corp.