SOLICITATION NOTICE
R -- Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP)
- Notice Date
- 6/26/2009
- Notice Type
- Combined Synopsis/Solicitation
- Contracting Office
- Department of the Army, U. S. Army Materiel Command, US Army, Army Contracting Command, Joint Munitions and Lethality (JM&L) Contracting Center, US Army, Army Contracting Command, Joint Munitions and Lethality (JM&L) Contracting Center, Picatinny Arsenal, New Jersey 07806-5000
- ZIP Code
- 07806-5000
- Solicitation Number
- W15QKN-09-R-0110
- Response Due
- 7/10/2009
- Archive Date
- 8/9/2009
- Point of Contact
- Mark Zator, Contract Specialist, (973)724-8121<br />
- E-Mail Address
-
Mark Zator
(mark.zator@us.army.mil)
- Small Business Set-Aside
- N/A
- Description
- This is a combined synopsis/solicitation for commercial items prepared inaccordance with the format in FAR Subpart 12.6, as supplemented with additional information included in this notice and all attachments. This announcement constitutes the only solicitation and a written solicitation will not be issued. The solicitation number W15QKN-09-R-0110 is issued for the Weapons & Software Engineering Center (WSEC) for specialized areas involving an ERP (Enterprise Resource Planning) Implementation. The U. S. Army Contracting Command, Picatinny Arsenal NJ, intends to solicit and award a Sole-Source Purchase Order to FORBES SOFTWARE INC for Enterprise Resource Planning Implementation in accordance with 10 U.S.C. 2304(c)(1), FAR 6.302-1(a)(2)(ii) and the attached Statement of Work (SOW). However, in accordance with FAR 13.104 this combined synopsis/solicitation is issued. Closing date for receipt of proposals is 5:00 p.m. EDT, July 10, 2009. Any response received after the due date and time will be considered untimely and may not be further considered for evaluation (ref. FAR 15.208(b)). Evaluation and award shall be made in accordance with FAR 13, Simplified Acquisition Procedures. Offerors shall submit proposals via e-mail to: mark.zator@us.army.mil or greg.rodriguez@us.army.mil. Offeror is required to include in their proposal their business size (i.e., small business or large business). The appropriate NAICS code and small business size standard is 541511 and 500 employees, respectively. PRICED CLIN STRUCTURE The following is a list of contract line item number(s) and items, quantities and units of measure, (including option(s), if applicable): CLINUNIT QTY 0001Class R Appraisal Enterprise Resource Planning Implementation (IAW) the Statement of Work 1 0002Contractor Manpower Reporting IAW Statement of Work 1 0003CDRL IAW the Statement of Work 1 PROPOSAL SUBMISSION INFORMATION (supplemental information to Reference FAR Provision 52.212-1 Instructions to Offerors-Commercial Items) The Offeror's proposal must include all data and information requested and must be submitted in accordance with these instructions and with the requirements as stated in this solicitation. The Offeror shall not submit their proposal on Standard Form 1449 (as referenced in 52.212-1), but instead may use Letterhead Stationery for electronic proposal submission. Electronic submission requirement: The Offerors proposal may be submitted on a Compact Disk to the attention of the named Contract Specialist at the depository location referenced in the synopsis, by the due date and time. All material must be submitted in Microsoft Office format the proposal must be in Word format (Windows Platform). Please identify the format in your transmittal. In addition, it is required that electronic submissions are scanned with the most up-to-date virus definition, with antivirus software of your choice. VolumeTitle: WSEC Enterprise Resource Planning Implementation Maximum Pages* IEnterprise Resource Planning Implementation 5 IIPrice FactorLimited to CLIN Structure IIIPast Performance 3 NOTE: *The page count starts by counting the pages from left to right, consecutively. Each volume of the proposal shall be as brief as possible, consistent with a complete submission, and shall not exceed the maximum of pages listed above. The Government will return any pages to the Offeror that exceed the page limitation, unevaluated. Annexes, documentation, and attachments submitted by the Offeror that are not in response to a specific part of the RFP will count against the page limitations. If pages have printing on both sides, each side will count as a separate page. The following will not count against page limitations: volume title pages, table of contents pages, cross-referencing pages, acronym lists, and page dividers (used to separate proposal sections). Pages should not exceed 8-1/2 inches in width by 11 inches in length; foldout pages depicting such items as sketches, factory floor layouts, etc. are acceptable but each fold will count as one page. The font used shall not be less than 10 Pitch. BASIS FOR AWARD OF A TECHNICALLY ACCEPTABLE PROPOSAL- Rating Definitions are as follows: I. Acceptable In order to be deemed acceptable, the Offerors proposal must address all items in the SOW above: The proposal identifies requisite technical expertise and knowledge IAW SOW. The proposal provides adequate cost information to determine price reasonableness (i.e. DCAA Forward Price Rate Agreement (FPRA)). If an FPRA is not available, the offeror shall provide cost information (i.e. pay stubs, etc.). The offeror has an acceptable record of past endeavors (past performance) on purchase orders or contracts of the same or similar effort and complexity as the effort required by this solicitation for Firm Fixed Price efforts (maximum of three (3) years). Factors that will be considered when determining whether an offeror has acceptable past performance history include the following: a.The offeror has a record of conforming to specifications and to standards of good workmanship. b.The offeror has a record of actively identifying potential problems which impact cost, schedule and performance. c.The offeror has the ability to resolve actual problems with minimal impact to cost, schedule and contract performance. d.The offeror has a history of reasonable and cooperative behavior and commitment to customer satisfaction. II.Unacceptable - The proposal fails to adequately demonstrate acceptability in one or more of the items in the SOW, as detailed in FAR 52.212-2 Evaluation Commercial Items (Jan 1999), included as an attachment to this solicitation. PRICE FACTOR Award will be made to the offeror with the Lowest Priced, Technically Acceptable Offer (LPTA). Prices proposed in the Priced CLIN Structure will be evaluated to determine if the price is fair and reasonable. Unrealistically low proposed prices may be grounds for eliminating a proposal from competition either on the basis that the offeror does not understand the requirement or the offeror has made an unrealistic proposal. The offeror's price proposal will be evaluated for award purposes by the total price for each priced CLIN/SLIN for the award. The prices for each CLIN/SLIN will then be added together to arrive at a total evaluated price. The offerors proposed price will be evaluated to ensure that the price proposed is fair and reasonable in accordance with FAR 13, Simplified Acquisition Procedures and FAR 15.404-1(b) Proposal Analysis Techniques. The Independent Government Cost Estimate will be used as corroborative price analysis. (End of Provision) Contracting Officer Greg Rodriguez AddressUS Army Contracting Command, CCJM-MA Building 10 Phipps Road Picatinny Arsenal, NJ 07806-5000 Emailgreg.rodriguez@us.army.mil Phone973-724-4876 GENERAL ADMINISTRATION: Contract SpecialistMark Zator AddressUS Army Contracting Command, CCJM-CC Building 9 Phipps Road Picatinny Arsenal, NJ 07806-5000 Emailmark.zator@us.army.mil Phone973-724-8121
- Web Link
-
FBO.gov Permalink
(https://www.fbo.gov/spg/USA/USAMC/DAAE30/W15QKN-09-R-0110/listing.html)
- Record
- SN01858542-W 20090628/090627001005-afef542a5c88f704f63a8c8e8cd905f1 (fbodaily.com)
- Source
-
FedBizOpps Link to This Notice
(may not be valid after Archive Date)
| FSG Index | This Issue's Index | Today's FBO Daily Index Page |