MODIFICATION
46 -- Feed-Water Processing Unit Rental
- Notice Date
- 8/11/2006
- Notice Type
- Modification
- NAICS
- 334513
— Instruments and Related Products Manufacturing for Measuring, Displaying, and Controlling Industrial Process Variables
- Contracting Office
- Department of the Navy, Naval Supply Systems Command, Fleet and Industrial Supply Center Jacksonville, 110 Yorktown Ave 3rd Floor, Code 200, Jacksonville, FL, 32212-0097
- ZIP Code
- 32212-0097
- Solicitation Number
- Reference-Number-V0336762747904
- Response Due
- 8/17/2006
- Archive Date
- 9/1/2006
- Description
- This amendment is posted to include Statement of Work and Contractor Evaluation: STATEMENT OF WORK The contractor shall provide equipment on a rental basis necessary to process approximately 70,000 to 90,000 gallons of feed water for the USS JOHN F. KENNEDY located at C-Pier, Naval Station Mayport, FL. Final water quality shall meet or exceed less than 25 micromhos/cm, dissolved silica .2ppm max. Hardness<. 10ppm. Total suspended solids .10-ppm max. Electrical requirements supplied by Mayport Naval Station are 1-phase, 115v, 60HZ. Contractor furnished equipment shall include one jumbo trailer (portable de-ionization plant) for continuous use, 75-200? hose and fittings to connect to ships riser as necessary. The maximum delivery time is 6-8 hours after placement of an order, while the target delivery time is within 2 hours after placement of an order. Fitting size 2 1/2?. To ensure that feed water, which, is processed from shore water, meets the above standards, the facility/contractor shall continuously monitor the conductivity of the feed water provide to the receiving ship. Activities providing feed water and steam to ships shall use the American Society for testing and Materials Method (ASTM) D-859 or the equivalent commercial test kit. Whenever the supplier of feed water tests its process water for silica, the water samples shall be stored in plastic (polyethylene) quart bottles or any other suitable container that will preclude contamination of the samples. Glass bottles shall not be used when sampling for silica. An analysis shall be obtained from the supplier of the feed water certifying that a sample of the shore steam condensate or feed water meets the requirements in the document found at the URL www.sematech.org/docubase/document/0934bstd.pdf as applicable. This requirement applies anytime pier side demineralizers are secured and restarted, regardless of how short the time. A manifold system shall be used such that continuous flowing pier side dematerialize effluent can be directed to waste or ship?s feed system without interrupting flow through the dematerialize. A 100-mesh Y-type strainer shall be installed in the feed line to the ship to preclude resin contamination of the ship?s system. The inlet and outlet water connections are 2-? inch hose thread. The ship can provide the hoses and 115 volts AC. The ship anticipates processing a minimum of 150,000 gallons each time it requests a rental. The contractor shall provide initial trailer drop off and set up all equipment, caustic regeneration charges and transportation and final pick up of the trailer and equipment when the service is no longer required. Contractor Evaluation: CONTRACTOR PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SURVEY COVER SHEET Name and address of offeror questionnaire is being completed for: Name of company completing questionnaire: Contract Number: _____________________________________________________________ Contract Type: ______________________________________________________________ Contract Amount: ______________________________________________________________ Contract Period of Performance ___________________________________________________ (including all options) Product/Service Description: _____________________________________________________ Name, title and phone number of person completing questionnaire: _______________________ _______________________ _______________________ Length of time your firm has been involved with this company:___________________________ Submit completed Cover Sheet and Survey via facsimile or e-mail to: CONTRACTING DEPARTMENT Fleet & Industrial Supply Center Attn: Arleen L. Starks, Code 240.AS Phone: (904) 542-0471 Fax: (904) 542-1095 e-mail: Arleen.Starks@navy.mil CONTRACTOR PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SURVEY RATING SHEET RATING SCALE Please use the following ratings to answer the questions. If you are unable to rate an item because it was not a requirement, never an issue, or you have no knowledge of the item in question, then you should mark ?NA?. EVALUATION CRITERIA Excellent - The company?s performance was consistently superior. Performance was entirely favorable and you wouldn?t hesitate to do business with them again. Good - The company?s performance was better than average, and you would willingly do business with them again. The contractual performance was mostly favorable and corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective. Neutral - No record exists. Average - The company?s performance was satisfactory and you would consider doing business with them again. There were minor performance problems which were satisfactorily corrected. Poor - The company?s performance was entirely unsatisfactory and you would not do business with them again under any circumstances. There were serious performance issues with the contractor for which the contractor?s corrective actions were ineffective. NOTE: For statements indicating ?Poor? or ?Excellent?, please provide an explanation in the comments section of the survey. CONTRACTOR PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SURVEY POOR AVERAGE NEUTRAL GOOD EXCELLENT A. QUALITY OF PRODUCT OR SERVICE: (1) The Contractor provided a product or service that conformed to contract requirements, specifications, and standards of good workmanship. (2) The Contractor submitted accurate reports. (3) The Contractor utilized personnel that were appropriate to the effort performed. B. COST CONTROL: (1) The Contractor performed the effort within the estimated cost/price. (2) The Contractor submitted accurate invoices on a timely basis. (3) The Contractor demonstrated cost efficiencies in performing the required effort. (4) The actual costs/rates realized closely reflected the negotiated costs/rates. C. SCHEDULE: (1) The tasks required under this effort were performed in a timely manner and in accordance with the period of performance of the contract. (2) The Contractor was responsive to technical and/or contractual direction. D. BUSINESS RELATIONSHIPS: (1) The Contractor demonstrated effective management over the effort performed. (2) The Contractor maintained an open line of communication so that the Contracting Officer?s Representative (COR) and/or Technical Point of Contact (TPOC) were apprised of technical, cost, and schedule issues. (3) The Contractor presented information and correspondence in a clear, concise, and businesslike manner. POOR AVERAGE NEUTRAL GOOD EXCELLENT (4) The Contractor promptly notified the COR, TPOC, and/or Contracting Officer in a timely manner regarding urgent issues. (5) The Contractor cooperated with the Government in providing flexible, proactive, and effective recommended solutions to critical program issues. (6) The Contractor made timely award to, and demonstrated effective management of, its subcontractors. (7) The Contractor demonstrated an effective small/small disadvantaged business subcontracting program. E. CUSTOMER SATISFACTION: (1) The products/services provided adequately met the needs of the program. (2) The Contractor was able to perform with minimal or no direction from the COR or the TPOC. (3) I am satisfied with the performance of the Contractor under this effort. F. KEY PERSONNEL: (1) The labor turnover in key personnel labor categories was minimal and did not adversely affect Contractor performance. (2) The Contractor proposed qualified personnel to fulfill the requirements of the contract. G. OTHER: (1) Would you award this firm another contract? ( ) Yes ( ) No If you answered ?No? provide an explanation.______________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________ (2) Was the contract terminated for default? ( ) Yes ( ) No If you answered ?Yes?, provide an explanation. ___________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________ COMMENTS: (Required for ALL Poor and Excellent Ratings) ___________________________________________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________________________________
- Place of Performance
- Address: USS JOHN F. KENNEDY, S-1 CUSTOMER SERVICE, C-PIER NAVAL AIR STATION MAYPORT
- Zip Code: 32228
- Country: UNITED STATES
- Zip Code: 32228
- Record
- SN01113269-W 20060813/060811221914 (fbodaily.com)
- Source
-
FedBizOpps Link to This Notice
(may not be valid after Archive Date)
| FSG Index | This Issue's Index | Today's FBO Daily Index Page |