MODIFICATION
Y -- Aircraft Research Support Facility
- Notice Date
- 5/22/2006
- Notice Type
- Modification
- NAICS
- 236220
— Commercial and Institutional Building Construction
- Contracting Office
- Department of the Navy, Naval Facilities Engineering Command, NAVFAC Washington, 1314 Harwood Street Washington Navy Yard, Washington, DC, 20374-5018
- ZIP Code
- 20374-5018
- Solicitation Number
- N4008006R0162
- Response Due
- 5/31/2006
- Archive Date
- 10/1/2006
- Point of Contact
- Nicole Rounay, Contract Specialist, Phone 202-685-3155, Fax 202-433-6193,
- E-Mail Address
-
nicole.rounay@navy.mil
- Description
- AIRCRAFT RESEARCH SUPPORT FACILITY NAVAL AIR STATION PATUXENT RIVER, PATUXENT RIVER MARYLAND (DESIGN-BUILD ACQUISITION) AIRCRAFT RESEARCH SUPPORT FACILITY NAVAL AIR STATION PATUXENT RIVER, PATUXENT RIVER MARYLAND (DESIGN-BUILD ACQUISITION) Offerors are reminded that they must respond to the Phase I factors ONLY by 2:00 p.m. EST on 31 May 2006. Phase II factors are provided for informational purposes only and may change with the issuance of the solicitation. All other terms and conditions of the combined synopsis/solicitation not changed by this amendment or previous amendments remain effective. The Design to Budget for this project is changed to read as follows: The Design to Budget for this project is $19,914,000.00. Factor 6 under Phase II is changed to read as follows: A. General This factor will be rated according to the following: 1. Design concept that demonstrates compliance with the RFP, and adherence to the Solicitation paragraphs that comprise ?Project Scope and Objectives?, as delineated at the beginning of this Solicitation, 2. Design concept that provides the greatest quantity of usable building area within the project cost budget, without exceeding the programmed space requirements. 3. Note that if the proposal includes specific nameplate ratings of systems or equipment, the Government is not in a position to evaluate the validity of such proposed ratings during the Solicitation process. As required by the RFP, it is the Contractor?s responsibility to determine the proper ratings of all equipment. If after award, during the design and construction process, it is determined by the Contractor that any of the ratings must be increased, the Offeror shall provide equipment at increased ratings, at no additional cost to the Government. B. Design Concept Submittal Requirements 1. Drawings: Provide schematic site plan, schematic floor plans, elevation and perspective indicating your proposed design solution (provide 11? x 17? drawings only). Plans and elevations shall illustrate how Offeror intends to meet the requirements of the RFP, including Anti-Terrorism / Force Protection impacts. 2. Basis of Design Narrative: Describes how the Offeror intends to meet the requirements of the RFP for successful execution of the subject project. Basis of Design Narrative should be broken out by section for each discipline and should demonstrate understanding and compliance with the requirements of the RFP. The Intent of the Basis of Design is to briefly explain general approach for addressing the RFP requirements for each of the following disciplines. Size of each section shall not exceed 2 pages. a. Architectural: Material for all major items of the exterior envelope, interior/exterior finishes and AT/FP considerations. Provide a square meter breakdown in the same format as shown in the RFP. b. Structural: Foundation System, Framing, Floor Systems, and Roof Systems. c. Mechanical: HVAC, chiller plant, and plumbing systems. d. Electrical: Electrical power systems and lighting. e. Life Safety & Handicap Accessibility: Building compliance with safety codes, fire protection and detection, and handicap accessibility. Also, DOD anti-terrorism / force protection requirements (note that any interpretations of DOD AT/FP must be approved by NAVFAC). f. Sustainable Design: The Navy desires that their facilities and construction methods incorporate sustainable design features to the greatest extent possible. Proposers are required to meet the requirements of the current minimum certified level of the LEED Green Building Rating System, and are encouraged to meet a higher rating within the identified project budget. Present the sustainable design features in tabular format (on LEED / Green Building Council ?Project Checklist?) to aid in the evaluation of proposals. ( Project Checklist is not included in page limitation.) Factor 7 under Phase II is changed to read as follows: The design and construction schedule for this project is negotiable, and realistic schedules that indicate completion in the shortest time will be viewed as favorable. By incorporation of the proposed schedule to the contract, the offeror agrees to comply with FAR 52.211-10, Commencement, Prosecution and Completion of Work (Apr 1984) and FAR 52.211-12, Liquidated Damages. Provide a narrative to demonstrate your team?s approach to accomplish the work. Describe the logic and sequence of events necessary for the successful execution of this project. Also provide a graphic timeline using Microsoft Project or a similar software. Provide a CPM schedule from contract award through construction completion. Identify critical path activities, milestones, durations and other important activities during post-contract award, design, fabrication, construction, and commissioning. The presentation shall clearly show the logic and sequence of events necessary for the successful execution of the project. Maximum design and construction duration shall be 550 days. Shorter schedule durations are viewed positively. All days are "calendar days". Price under Phase II is changed to read as follows: This Design-Build Project has a Design to Budget of $19,914,000.00. Offerors must provide a proposal that meets the scope of this project at the specified budget. Price shall be provided on the Price Schedule included in the solicitation. The proposal should contain a breakdown of pricing in the Construction Standard Industry (CSI) format. Prices will be evaluated in terms of reasonableness based on a comparison of the Government Estimate and other prices received. If necessary, Offerors should identify any items in the scope the have been deleted or modified in order to meet the stated budget. Items that are deleted or modified should be clearly described and include the associated price. In all cases, the most viable design solutions should be presented for the stated budget. If technical issues are included in the price proposal, they must also be included in the technical proposal. If the offeror determines that the project cannot be designed and constructed for a price that falls within the budget, scope variances shall be proposed for the Government?s consideration. Each variance shall specifically identify the impact to the overall project and include an associated price. Added value is more important than reduced pricing. If the proposed price falls within the budget, enhancements to the scope are encouraged for consideration by the Government. Each shall specifically identify why the offeror believes it is an enhancement to the project and include an associated price. An offer that provides a higher overall value within the budget will be rated higher than an offer of lesser overall value. The determination of best value will take into consideration the acceptability of proposed variances and enhancements.
- Place of Performance
- Address: Naval Air Station Patuxent River, Putxent River, MD
- Country: United States
- Country: United States
- Record
- SN01055010-W 20060524/060522220854 (fbodaily.com)
- Source
-
FedBizOpps Link to This Notice
(may not be valid after Archive Date)
| FSG Index | This Issue's Index | Today's FBO Daily Index Page |