SOLICITATION NOTICE
Y -- Presidential Helicopter Programs Support Facility
- Notice Date
- 7/15/2004
- Notice Type
- Solicitation Notice
- NAICS
- 236210
— Industrial Building Construction
- Contracting Office
- Department of the Navy, Naval Facilities Engineering Command, Engineering Field Activity, Chesapeake, 1314 Harwood Street Washington Navy Yard, Washington, DC, 20374-5018
- ZIP Code
- 20374-5018
- Solicitation Number
- N62477-04-R-0161
- Response Due
- 8/4/2004
- Archive Date
- 8/19/2004
- Point of Contact
- Wanda McQueen, Contracting Officer, Phone (202) 685-3188, Fax (202) 433-7077,
- E-Mail Address
-
wanda.mcqueen@navy.mil
- Description
- The Presidential Helicopter Programs Support Facility at Naval Air Station, Patuxent River, MD is split into three separate, but intertwined construction projects. The first project (P-159) consists of the design and the subsequent construction of a 7,251 square meters secure multi-story building with one maintenance hanger and support spaces. This facility includes a hanger deck, a parking apron, taxiway access, and an adjoining support building with a series of technical laboratories and an assembly area, tool room, a strip and painting aircraft facility, storage areas, an entrance lobby with security control center, SCIF facilities, and office/administrative spaces. In addition, the project will add site improvements to include substantial utility extensions, an aircraft apron, vehicle parking (to accommodate 442 full-time personnel) and roadways, sidewalks and landscaping. The second half of the project (P-966) consists of the design and the subsequent construction of a 650 square meters secure multi-story building with one Air Operations Control Tower and support spaces to function as a new control tower for the Air Operations activities at NAS Patuxent River, MD. The facility will include a training room, locker room, and observation space. Parking and electrical work will also be provided. One of the Air Ops current buildings, which sits on the new hanger site, will be demolished, and Air Ops will be relocated to a new addition to Building 1355. This addition consists of the design and the subsequent construction of a 400 square meters building with office spaces, restrooms, and a mess area. An HVAC system will be provided as well as updated electrical utilities and parking. This is a design-build project that will be procured utilizing a two-phase process per FAR Part 36. The estimated cost of construction is between $25M and $100M. Offerors must respond to the Phase I factors ONLY by 2:00 p.m. EST on 4 August 2004. Please mail an original and three copies to the above address or deliver to the mail room on the 1st floor of Bldg. 212. Electronic submissions will not be accepted. Please note that a solicitation is NOT being issued at this time. The solicitation will only be issued to the most highly qualified offerors after evaluation of Phase I submissions. The government anticipates issuing the solicitation on/about 31 August 2004. The technical factors identified below are equal in importance to each other. PHASE I. Factor 1 - Relevant Experience (Construction Team). Provide a maximum of five relevant projects, performed within the past ten years that are similar in size, scope, function and complexity to the subject project. Relevant project experience is defined as large airfield construction projects (such as military or commercial aircraft hanger and engine maintenance high bay structures, top secret or secret SCIF laboratories spaces) on active military airfields and/or FAA commercial airfield environments whether as prime contractor or as part of a joint venture. In addition to a description of your relevant experience for each listed project, the offeror shall provide the following information: Contract Number & Type (i.e., fixed price, cost), Contract Title, Customer and Contracting Officer points of contact and current phone numbers, Original Award Amount, Award Date, Original Completion Date, Final Amount, Final Completion Date. Factor 2 - Relevant Experience (Design Team). Provide a maximum of five relevant projects, performed within the past ten years that are similar in size, scope, function and complexity to the subject project. Relevant project .experience is defined as large airfield construction projects (such as military or commercial aircraft hanger and engine maintenance high bay structures, top secret or secret SCIF laboratories spaces) on active military airfields and/or FAA commercial airfield environments whether as prime contractor or as part of a joint venture. In addition to a description of your relevant experience for each listed project, the offeror shall provide the following information: Contract Number & Type (i.e., fixed price, cost), Contract Title, Customer and Contracting Officer points of contact and current phone numbers, Original Award Amount, Award Date, Original Completion Date, Final Amount, Final Completion Date. Factor 3 ? Design and Construction Team Relationship. Describe the relationship between the design team and the construction contractor. Identify if any of the projects previously listed were design/build and performed by the proposed design/build team for this project. Additionally, the offeror may highlight any other projects performed by the proposed design/build team to further demonstrate your relationship. For additional projects identified, provide a point of contact and current phone number of an individual knowledgeable of your performance. Describe the A/E?s involvement in the construction phase and the Contractor?s involvement during the design phase. Describe how quality control will be integrated into your proposed teaming approach and the A/E?s involvement in quality control throughout the project. Provide a narrative of no more than five pages. Factor 4a ? Subcontracting History. Factor 4a is intended to obtain the offerors history of subcontracting to Small Business, Small Disadvantaged, Historically underutilized small zone small businesses, women owned small businesses, service disabled veteran owned small businesses, veteran owned small businesses and historically black college and university/minority institutes. Factors 4a and 4b are subfactors equal in importance to each other. Factor 4b will be evaluated under Phase II and an overall rating for this factor will be assigned. Offerors must address the following in sufficient detail to allow proper evaluation and rating: 1. Provide SF-294 forms, "Subcontracting Report for Individual Contracts?, for projects identified under technical factor 1, Relevant Past Performance. If the referenced projects were not DOD procurements and an SF-294 was not required, provide any other documentation showing compliance with the utilization of Small Business firms in each noted category. (e.g., Small, Small Disadvantaged, HUBZone Small, Veteran Owned small, Service Disabled Veteran Owned Small and Historically Black Colleges and Universities/Minority Institutions, if applicable). Include the dollar value and percentage of work (of total contract value) subcontracted to these entities. If goals were not met on the referenced contracts, provide an explanation as to why. 2. Provide information on any awards you?ve received within the past three (3) years for outstanding support to the small business community. 3. Provide performance evaluation ratings obtained on implementation of subcontracting plans, if available, on the DOD contracts submitted under (1) above. 4. Provide information on existing or pending mentor-prot?g? agreements. 5. Provide information, if available, on use of Community Rehabilitation Programs organizations certified under the Javits-Wagner O?Day Program (JWOD) by NISH or NIB. PAST PERFORMANCE. Past Performance information is one indicator of an offeror?s ability to perform this contract successfully. This evaluation will include the performance history of both the construction entity and the design entity. The relevancy and source of the information, context of data, and general trends in a contractor?s performance shall be taken into consideration. The assessment of the offeror?s past performance will be used as a means of evaluating the relative capability of the offeror and establishes a level of confidence or risk for successful performance under this contract. Past Performance findings will influence the relative standing of the offeror. Findings will be used to validate proposals against established criteria. By contacting references provided under Factors 1, 2 and 3, the Government will evaluate the offerors past performance. Offerors are authorized to provide information on problems encountered on the identified contracts and corrective actions taken. In investigating the contractor?s past performance, the Government is not limited to the references submitted but may rely on other sources as well. Evaluation of Past Performance will be a subjective assessment. The Government is seeking to determine whether the offeror has consistently demonstrated a commitment to customer satisfaction and timely delivery of services as well as fair and reasonable pricing. The Government will evaluate the offeror?s record of conforming to specifications and standards of good workmanship, and will evaluate the offeror?s record on cost control/change orders and adherence to contract schedules. Subcontractor management, safety management and other quality control programs will also be reviewed. The Government will examine the offeror?s record for reasonable and cooperative behavior and commitment to customer satisfaction, and in general, the offeror?s business-like concern for the interest of the customer. Offerors may be given an opportunity to address unfavorable reports of past performance, and the offeror?s response will be taken into consideration. A review of CCAS and ACAS may be performed. Phase II factors are hereby provided for informational purposes only. The full text of these factors will be provided in the solicitation. Please do NOT respond to Phase II factors at this time. PHASE II. Factor 4b ? Subcontracting Plan (project specific). The Naval Facilities Engineering Command has established subcontracting targets of at least 73.7% of the subcontracting efforts to small business firms. Of the total subcontracted effort, the targets are a minimum of 3.1% to HUBZone Small Business firms, 15.3% to SDB firms, 13.8% to WOSB firms, 3% to SDVOSB firms. Large business firms will be evaluated against these targets with more credit given to firms who exceed these targets. Factor 5 - Construction Schedule. Provide a narrative to demonstrate your team?s logic and sequence of events necessary for the successful completion of the VXX Hangar and Air Traffic Control Tower by April 2006. Include in narrative an estimated staffing, overtime scheduling, and equipment requirements to complete the aggressive schedule of this project. Factor 6 - Design Solution. Provide schematic site plan, schematic floor plan(s), elevation and perspective indicating your proposed design solution (provide 11? x 17? drawings only). Plans and elevations shall illustrate how the offeror intends to meet requirements within the RFP. All drawings shall illustrate the incorporation of the UFC 4-010-01, Anti Terrorism Force Protection requirements and all other DOD airfield clearance requirements (including all setbacks). PRICE. Price will be evaluated during Phase II in terms of reasonableness based on a comparison of the government estimate and other prices received.
- Place of Performance
- Address: Naval Air Station, Patuxent River, Maryland
- Country: USA
- Country: USA
- Record
- SN00624301-W 20040717/040716104326 (fbodaily.com)
- Source
-
FedBizOpps.gov Link to This Notice
(may not be valid after Archive Date)
| FSG Index | This Issue's Index | Today's FBO Daily Index Page |