MOD | A | HIGH EFFICIENCY, LOW COST, EXPENDABLE, SUBSONIC TURBINE ENGINE BROAD AGENCY ANNOUNCEMENT, W31P4Q-04-R-RB01, EXTENSION OF PROPOSAL DUE DATE AND UPDATES ON PROPOSALS SUBMITTED PREVIOUSLY ON 11 MAY 2004.

FBO DAILY ISSUE OF JULY 02, 2004 FBO #0949
MODIFICATION

A -- HIGH EFFICIENCY, LOW COST, EXPENDABLE, SUBSONIC TURBINE ENGINE BROAD AGENCY ANNOUNCEMENT, W31P4Q-04-R-RB01, EXTENSION OF PROPOSAL DUE DATE AND UPDATES ON PROPOSALS SUBMITTED PREVIOUSLY ON 11 MAY 2004.

Notice Date: 6/30/2004
Notice Type: Modification
NAICS: 541710 — Research and Development in the Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences
Contracting Office: US Army Aviation and Missile Command (Missile), ATTN: AMSAM-AC, Building 5303, Martin Road, Redstone Arsenal, AL 35898-5280
ZIP Code: 35898-5280
Solicitation Number: W31P4Q-04-R-RB01
Response Due: 8/3/2004
Archive Date: 10/2/2004
Point of Contact: Andy Eiermann, 256-313-0097
E-Mail Address: Email your questions to US Army Aviation and Missile Command (Missile)
(andy.eiermann@redstone.army.mil)
Small Business Set-Aside: N/A
Description: Section 1. HIGH EFFICIENCY, LOW COST, EXPENDABLE, SUBSONIC TURBINE ENGINE BROAD AGENCY ANNOUNCEMENT, W31P4Q-04-R-RB01. EXTENSION OF PROPOSAL DUE DATE AND UPDATES ON PROPOSALS SUBMITTED PREVIOUSLY ON 11 MAY 2004. EXTENSION IS DUE TO PROGRAM FUNDING DELAY UNTIL FY 2005 . The proposal due date is extended from 11 MAY 2004 to 03 AUGUST 2004. Request proposal validity until 16 NOV 2004. Updates to previous proposals received on 11 MAY 2004 are limited to 2 pages for Technical/Management (Part I) and unlimited for Cost (Part I I). The Propulsion Technology Function, Propulsion and Structures Directorate (P&SD), U. S. Army Aviation and Missile Research, Development, and Engineering Center is requesting proposals for high efficiency, low cost, expendable, subsonic turbine engine propu lsion systems suitable for use as the sustainer in the Non Line of Sight Launch System Loiter Attack Missile (NLOS LS LAM). The contractor shall deliver high efficiency, low cost, expendable, subsonic turbine engine designs, analysis, and hardware for use and evaluation in close combat tactical missile system applications such as the NLOS LS LAM. The contractor shall deliver to the government propulsion components and integrated propulsion units to demonstrate the state of the art for high efficiency, low cost, expendable, subsonic turbine engine propulsion systems. Section 2. Technical Requirements General a. The contractor shall develop concepts, designs, and hardware for subsonic tactical missiles using highly efficient, low cost, subsonic turbine engine air breathing propulsion systems in the 30 to 50 lb thrust class. b. Low Specific Fuel Consumption (SFC), high durability, packaging, and low per unit cost shall be considered as design variables. c. The final demonstrated flight weight propulsion module shall be a possible replacement for the propulsion module used in the NLOS LS LAM, or any Army authorized derivative of the NLOS LS LAM missile, and shall be compatible with all electrical and mechanical interfaces. d. The contractor shall work closely with the NLOS LS LAM prime contractor to insure the propulsion module integration functionality. e. No government furnished equipment (GFE) or government furnished property (GFP) is anticipated for executing this contract. f. The contractor shall deliver the detailed designs, analyses, and test hardware for expendable evaluation of selected concepts at P&SD. Section 3. Technical Requirements Specific a. Multiple contract awards are anticipated for this effort. Options may be exercised based on successful completion of the Basic effort and each succeeding option effort. Options will be exercised at the discretion of the government. b. BASIC EFFORT: (The estimated performance is 6 to 9 months) The contractor shall develop the concepts, designs, and analysis in sufficient detail to enable the government to assess the effectiveness and applicability of the propulsion module. This includes, but is not limited to, feasibility, performance, packaging, risk, weight, and cost. The contractor shall summarize the pros and cons for each concept, indicate the technical hurdles, and suggest the test and analysis required to overcome these hurdles. Prototype hardware and rig tests of critical funct ion hardware would be beneficial. A non-functional, but mechanically accurate prototype propulsion module shall be delivered as part of the final report. An accurate computer solid model will be delivered as part of the final report. A detailed cycle de ck model shall be delivered based on best estimates of engine performance. c. OPTION I: COMPONENT/BRASS BOARD DEVELOPMENT: (The estimated performance is 12 to 24 months) (1) The contractor shall develop a demonstration prototype engine propulsion module that quantitatively exhibits the properties required. The delivered module is not required to be i n a final, flight weight configuration, but shall be reasonably demonstrated to have the potential for such packaging and functionality. The module shall include a prototype engine, fuel delivery system, lubrication system, (if required), and pyrotechnic start system. In addition, the propulsion module must be capable of being operated in an alternate, non-pyrotechnic static testing (e.g. air spin and torch/sparker ignition with associated hardware and documentation) configuration. The contractor shall d eliver a complete drawing package, solid model, and all ancillary hardware, software, and documentation required for operation of the propulsion module from a test stand. (2) Actual test data shall be provided from the manufacturer that quantifiably demonstrates low SFC, starting, operation, control, and longevity. A cycle deck shall be developed that reflects the actual, updated, performance of the engine. The co ntractor shall deliver a minimum of three sets of components and propulsion units with all necessary hardware for static verification testing at the P&SD. The contractor shall also deliver a minimum of five sets of pyrotechnic expendables used in the flig ht weight starting configuration. The engine modules shall be fully instrumented by the manufacturer. (3) Complete documentation shall be delivered, which should include, but not be limited to, engine setup and installation, operation and shutdown procedures, maximum component limits, complete instrumentation lists, parts lists, assembly and disas sembly instructions, as well as fuel control interfaces, devices, and software required to run the engine in a test stand environment. The instrumentation list shall include high limits, low limits, and expected mean values of each data station. Reasonab le spare and rebuild parts shall be delivered. The contractor shall deliver calibrated and instrumented inlets and exhausts, or calibrated copies of those used in their internal facility tests. Any specialized test stand mounting hardware, cradles, or fi ttings shall be provided. The contractor shall be required to perform post-test data analysis, in conjunction with P&SD personnel, and provide cycle deck updates that quantify the performance of the components or propulsion unit and reconciles performance to the pretest estimates. d. OPTION II: FLIGHT TYPE HARDWARE DESIGN AND VALIDATION: (The estimated performance is 12-24 months) (1) The contractor shall deliver a near tactical, high efficiency, low cost, subsonic airbreathing flight weight engine propulsion module suitable for flight-testing. This module shall demonstrate near tactical packaging and functionality, includi ng start, fuel delivery and tankage. The flight weight unit designed as part of this effort shall be based on updated system parameters provided by the PS&D. Actual manufacturer test data of the tactical propulsion module package shall be provided which quantifiably demonstrates low SFC, starting, operation, control, and long life at Sea Level Static (SLS) conditions and at altitude. A complete solid model and drawing package shall be included. The contractor shall deliver a minimum of three sets of com ponents and integrated flight weight propulsion units with all necessary hardware for static verification testing at the P&SD. The contractor shall also deliver a minimum of five sets of pyrotechnic expendables used in the flight weight starting configura tion. (2) To produce the detail designs of the flight type test hardware, the contractor shall define any propulsion/missile interfaces, generate a conceptual design of the flight type hardware, generate detailed flight weight drawings, and conduct desi gn reviews as required. P&SD shall participate in the design review process along with other Army designated agencies or contractors. The contractor shall manufacture and integrate all the hardware required to support the flight type system testing to include any specialized instrumentation and test/missile interfaces. The contractor shall update their design and performance models based on the outcome of the flight type hardware validation. e. OPTION III: FLIGHT TEST HARDWARE AND SUPPORT The contractor shall deliver a minimum of three fully assembled flight weight propulsion modules. The contractor shall also deliver a minimum of five sets of pyrotechnic expendables used in the flight weight starting configuration. The contractor shall pr ovide technical and hardware support for three flight tests. PROPOSAL PREPARATION GUIDELINES Original and three copies of the Technical/Management (Part I) part shall be submitted. Original and one copy of the Cost (Part II) part shall be submitted. The proposal shall consist of two parts, Technical/Management (Part I) and Cost (Part II). Part I shall not exceed 30 pages excluding resumes and exhibits. (12-point text). Resumes shall specify names of individuals and qualifications for this effort. Adequacy of personnel to perform this effort will be based on education and experience. Fold outs a re not permitted. The proposal shall contain a one-page abstract summarizing the proposed effort that is unclassified and releasable to the public. All pages of the proposal shall be marked with appropriate classification proprietary markings. No classi fied material will be accepted. The evaluation criteria for this BAA are included in this notice at Attachment 1. Part I of the proposal shall include: a. Proposer??????s cover page to include: Title, technical points of contact (POC), administrative POC, pertinent phone numbers, fax numbers, and email addresses. b. Summary page(s) of organizations participating in the proposal with title, technical POC, administrative POC, pertinent phone numbers, fax numbers, and email addresses. c. A one page abstract that is unclassified and not competition sensitive describing the proposal. d. Overall technical plans and analysis to show how the contractor??????s concepts will meet the technical requirements of the announcement. e. An overall program schedule to include deliverable items. NOTE: Proposals that were received 11 MAY 2004 are limited to a 2 page update for Part I Technical/Management Part II of the proposal shall include: a. A Cost Summary not to exceed two pages, include the names & addresses of cognizant DCAA and DCMA offices. b. Supporting pages that include a detailed breakdown of labor, materials, and other costs to include direct and indirect costs. NOTE: Proposals that were received 11 MAY 2004 can up-date Part II Cost as per a. and b. above. All offerors are required to provide proposal validity to 16 NOV 2004. General Information 1. The government will accept proposals until 03 AUG 2004. The government will not accept proposals after this date. The government reserves the right to select for award any, all, part, or none of the responses received and may incrementally fund any r esultant contract. Note that only the contracting officer has authorization to award government contractual agreements pursuant to this BAA. All responsible sources may submit a proposal which shall receive consideration by the government. The government reserves the right to award to other than the lowest offeror. The evaluation will be based on best value to the government and include an assessment of life cycle costs, including disposal. 2. The government may award multiple contracts for this effort not to exceed $15,000,000 each, including options. The government plans to fund this effort incrementally. Initially, a payment of $50,000 to $250,000 for the Basic Effort shall be funded up on contract award. 3. The government may award a contract on the basis of initial offers received, without discussions (other than exchanges conducted for the purpose of minor clarification). Therefor e, each initial offer should contain the offeror??????s best terms in all areas. 4. This requirement is issued as a Broad Agency Announcement. A cost plus fixed fee contract is contemplated as a result of this solicitation announcement. Receipt of proposals will be restricted to the United States and its territorial contractors who possess a SECRET security facility clearance. No foreign participation will be considered. 5. Submit all correspondence and proposals to: U.S. Army Aviation and Missile Command AMSAM-AC-OS-RB/Andy Eiermann, Building 5400, Room B-120, Redstone Arsenal, AL 35898-5270. Offerors without access to Redstone Arsenal, AL cannot submit proposals by han d-carry. Proposals submitted via facsimile machine shall not be considered. There shall be no formal request for proposal or any further solicitation document issued in regard to this BAA. Written proposals shall be evaluated approximately 45 calendar da ys after they are due in to the government. Final negotiation shall take place and the contract should be awarded 45 days after the evaluation is completed. Proposals/updates/proposal validity are due by AUGUST 03, 2004 at 4:00 p.m. CST. ATTACHMENT 1 - EVALUATION CRITERIA The evaluation criteria are delineated by areas and elements within an area. The two areas of this evaluation are Technical/Management and Cost. The Technical/Management area is significantly more important than Cost. 1. SPECIFIC a. Technical/Management: The technical/management evaluation criteria consists of three elements: (1) the offeror??????s general understanding of the development of high efficiency, low cost, expendable, subsonic turbine engine technology, (2) the o fferor??????s application of high efficiency, low cost, expendable, subsonic turbine engine technology ideas and approaches, and (3) the offeror??????s high efficiency, low cost, expendable, subsonic turbine engine experience and facility capability. Elem ents (1),(2) and (3) are weighted equally. (1) General Understanding Of High Efficiency, Low Cost, Expendable, Subsonic Turbine Engine Technology. Offeror's comprehension of the technical requirements in the BAA will be evaluated. The Offeror??????s understanding of the technical advantages and disadvantages of various approaches will be evaluated. The Offeror??????s adequacy of experiments and designs assumptions shall be evaluated. The offeror shall have a firm conceptual, analytical, and mechanical understanding of the performance for each proposed concept. Offerors shall be evaluated on its demonstration of all pertinent propulsion unit interface requirements to include electrical I/O power, propulsion module/airframe packaging, fuel control interface, and missile guidance and control issu es that are directly related to each high efficiency, low cost, expendable, turbine engine option. Offerors shall be evaluated on the adequacy of their management plan detailing how the effort will be performed and managed. The plan shall include propos ed personnel to perform the effort. Adequacy of personnel to perform this effort will be based on education and experience. (2) Application of High Efficiency, Low Cost, Expendable, Subsonic Turbine Engine Technology Ideas and Approaches. Offeror??????s proposal shall include and be evaluated on the adequacy of specific designs that address the application of high efficiency , low cost, expendable, subsonic turbine engine technology to a close combat missile such as NLOS-LS LAM. For each design concept, a trade-off matrix (cost, performance, efficiency, volume, weight, packaging, accessories, and specific interface issues) sha ll be developed and supported with data. The critical technical issues with each concept should be identified, and a plan that answers these technical questions shall be provided. The plan may include rig testing for critical hardware. Offerors shall pre pare and be evaluated on the adequacy of their manage ment plan that demonstrates how the effort will be performed and managed. The plan shall include proposed personnel to perform the effort. Adequacy of personnel to perform this effort will be based on education and experience. (3) High Efficiency, Low Cost, Expendable, Subsonic Turbine Engine Experience And Facility Capability. Offerors shall be evaluated on relevant technical experience and facility capability to high efficiency, low cost, expendable, subsonic turbine engine s, including a description of propulsion research and development capabilities. The technical experience shall address that directly possessed by the offeror and by potential subcontractors. Hands-on experience in the design, fabrication, integration, te sting and analysis of high efficiency, low cost, expendable, subsonic turbine engine hardware shall be considered very beneficial. The current production and manufacturing capabilities should be sufficient to directly apply the results of the research to a Systems Development and Demonstration (SDD) effort. Offerors shall be evaluated on the adequacy of their management plan that demonstrates how the effort will be performed and managed. The plan shall include proposed personnel to perform the effort. Adequacy of personnel to perform this effort will be based on education and experience. 2. Price/Cost The price/cost will be evaluated on the basis of reasonableness of the proposed cost and the realism of the cost numbers that are proposed.
Place of Performance: Address: US Army Aviation and Missile Command (Missile) ATTN: AMSAM-AC, Building 5303, Martin Road Redstone Arsenal AL; Zip Code: 35898-5280; Country: US
Record: SN00613018-W 20040702/040630212236 (fbodaily.com)
Source: FedBizOpps.gov Link to This Notice
(may not be valid after Archive Date)

| FSG Index | This Issue's Index | Today's FBO Daily Index Page |

Loren Data's SAM Daily™

A -- HIGH EFFICIENCY, LOW COST, EXPENDABLE, SUBSONIC TURBINE ENGINE BROAD AGENCY ANNOUNCEMENT, W31P4Q-04-R-RB01, EXTENSION OF PROPOSAL DUE DATE AND UPDATES ON PROPOSALS SUBMITTED PREVIOUSLY ON 11 MAY 2004.